[French law related to patient's rights and end of life: pediatric intensive care unit's health professionals' opinions]

[French law related to patient's rights and end of life: pediatric intensive care unit's health professionals' opinions]

de Saint Blanquat L; Cremer R; Elie C; Lesage F; Dupic L; Hubert P; pour le Groupe francophone de réanimation et urgences pédiatriques (GFRUP)

Archives De Pediatrie

2014

Child; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Palliative Care; patient care team; Terminal Care; Attitude of Health Personnel; Withholding Treatment; Resuscitation Orders; Double Effect Principle; Suicide; Patient Rights; Pediatric; Health Surveys; France; Assisted; Health Care; Quality Assurance

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To identify the knowledge of caregivers of pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) on the French law related to patients' rights and end of life, their views on withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (WWLST) decisions, and their feelings about how these decisions were made and implemented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter survey in 24 French PICUs during the fourth trimester 2010. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred and thirty-nine professional healthcare workers (1005 paramedics and 334 physicians) responded. Over 85% of caregivers had good knowledge of the WWLST decision-making processes required by law. More than 80% of caregivers accepted mechanical ventilation, hemodiafiltration, or hemodynamic support withdrawal or withholding. Nevertheless, the withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration generated reluctance or opposition for the majority of respondents. While paramedics' participation in the decision-making process was deemed necessary by all caregivers, paramedics found more often than physicians that they were insufficiently involved. The quality of end-of-life care was judged very positively by caregivers. The answers on how WWLST was applied suggest very different interpretations of the law. Some caregivers respect the principles of palliative care as stated in the public health code and 40% of doctors and 64% of caregivers consider it "acceptable" to hasten death if resulting from a collaborative decision-making process. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to show that caregivers of French PICUs have good knowledge of the French law concerning the end of life. Yet, there is still confusion about the limits of practice during the end-of-life period.

2014-01

Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).

Journal Article

Backlog