Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project

Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project

Davidoff F; Batalden PB; Stevens D; Ogrinc G; Mooney SE; SQUIRE development group

Bmj (clinical Research Ed.)

2009

Consensus; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Interprofessional Relations; Quality of Health Care; Forecasting; RDF Project; Editorial Policies; Publishing/standards

In 2005 we published draft guidelines for reporting studies of quality improvement, as the initial step in a consensus process for development of a more definitive version. The current article contains the revised version, which we refer to as standards for quality improvement reporting excellence (SQUIRE). This narrative progress report summarises the special features of improvement that are reflected in SQUIRE, and describes major differences between SQUIRE and the initial draft guidelines. It also briefly describes the guideline development process; considers the limitations of and unresolved questions about SQUIRE; describes ancillary supporting documents and alternative versions under development; and discusses plans for dissemination, testing, and further development of SQUIRE.

2009

Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).

Journal Article

Backlog