'Do Not Resuscitate' Orders: Incidence and Implications in a Medical Intensive Care Unit
Title
'Do Not Resuscitate' Orders: Incidence and Implications in a Medical Intensive Care Unit
Creator
Youngner SJ; Lewandowski W; McClish DK; Juknialis BW; Coulton C; Bartlett ET
Identifier
Publisher
Jama
Date
1985
Description
"Do not resuscitate" (DNR) decisions were examined in a medical intensive care unit (MICU) of a 1,000-bed hospital. Seventy-one (14%) of 506 study patients were designated DNR; nine survived hospitalization. Severity of illness, age, and prior health were predictive of DNR orders; race and socioeconomic factors were not. The DNR patients consumed more resources, both before and after DNR orders. Interventions started before DNR designation were continued in at least 76% of patients. Documented justifications of DNR decisions included poor prognosis (59%), poor quality of life (24%), and patients' wishes (15%). There were no written justifications for the DNR decisions in 30 cases (42%). Although willingness to write DNR orders in an MICU and continued active treatment of DNR patients are both reassuring in a general sense, they raise questions about the consistency of treatment plans and goals for individual patients.(JAMA 1985;253:54-57)
Rights
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Type
Journal Article
Citation List Month
Backlog
Citation
Youngner SJ; Lewandowski W; McClish DK; Juknialis BW; Coulton C; Bartlett ET, “'Do Not Resuscitate' Orders: Incidence and Implications in a Medical Intensive Care Unit,” Pediatric Palliative Care Library, accessed April 26, 2024, https://pedpalascnetlibrary.omeka.net/items/show/12402.