Work-related quality of life in professionals involved in pediatric palliative care: a repeated cross-sectional comparative effectiveness study

Work-related quality of life in professionals involved in pediatric palliative care: a repeated cross-sectional comparative effectiveness study

Gerber AK; Feuz U; Zimmermann K; Mitterer S; Simon M; von der Weid N; Bergstrasser E

Palliative Care and Social Practice

2024

Hospitals Pediatric; Female; Male; Palliative Care; Quality of Life; Questionnaires; Adult; Attitude of Health Personnel; Health Personnel; Middle Age; Switzerland; Data Analysis Software; Human; Support Psychosocial; T-Tests; Descriptive Statistics; Regression; Pediatric Care; Chi Square Test; Multidisciplinary Care Team; Funding Source; Work Experiences; Cross Sectional Studies; Workload; Psychosocial Factors; Comparative Studies; Summated Rating Scaling; Pearson's Correlation Coefficient; Repeated Measures; Sociodemographic Factors; Work Environment; Quality of Working Life; Shiftwork; Structural Equation Modeling

Background: Working in pediatric palliative care (PPC) impacts healthcare and allied professionals' work-related quality of life (QoL). Professionals who lack specific PPC training but who regularly provide services to the affected children have articulated their need for support from specialized PPC (SPPC) teams. Objectives: This study had two objectives: (1) to evaluate whether the availability of a SPPC team impacted the work-related QoL of professionals not specialized in PPC; and (2) to explore the work-related QoL of professionals working in PPC without specialized training. Design: Repeated cross-sectional comparative effectiveness design. Methods: One hospital with an established SPPC program and affiliated institutions provided the intervention group (IG). Three hospitals and affiliated institutions where generalist PPC was offered provided the comparison group (CG). Data were collected by paper-pencil questionnaire in 2021 and 2022. The Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL 5) questionnaire was used to assess work-related QoL, yielding separate scores for burnout (BO), secondary traumatic stress (STS) and compassion satisfaction (CS). A descriptive statistical analysis was performed and general estimation equations were modelled. To increase the comparability of the IG and CG, participants were matched by propensity scores. Results: The 301 participating non-PPC-specialized professionals had overall low to moderate levels of BO and STS and moderate to high levels of CS. However, none of these scores (BO: p = 0.36; STS: p = 0.20; CS: p = 0.65) correlated significantly with support from an SPPC team. Compared to nurses, physicians showed higher levels of BO (1.70; p = 0.02) and STS (2.69; p ⩽ 0.001). Conclusion: Although the study sample's overall work-related QoL was satisfactory, it showed a considerable proportion of moderate BO and STS, as well as moderate CS. To provide tailored support to professionals working in PPC, evidence regarding key SPPC support elements and their effectiveness is needed.

Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).

July List 2024