Deep brain stimulation in children: experience and technical pearls

Deep brain stimulation in children: experience and technical pearls

Air E L; Ostrem J L; Sanger T D; Starr P A

Journal of Neurosurgery - Pediatrics

2011

Adolescent; Adult; Age; Factors Brain/pa [Pathology]; Brain/ra [Radiography]; Child; Preschool; Deep Brain Stimulation/ae [Adverse Effects]; Deep Brain Stimulation/mt [Methods]; Dystonia/pp [Physiopathology]; Dystonia/th [Therapy]; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Movement; Retrospective Studies; Tomography; X-Ray Computed Treatment Outcome; tone and motor problems; Glutaric acidemia type I; Lesch-Nyhan syndrome; deep brain stimulation; secondary dystonia

OBJECT: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established technique for the treatment of several movement disorders in adults. However, the technical approach, complications, and results of DBS in children have not been well documented. METHODS: A database of DBS implantations performed at a single institution, prospectively established in 1998, was reviewed for patients who received DBS prior to the age of 18. Diagnoses, surgical technique, and complications were noted. Outcomes were assessed using standard rating scales of neurological function. RESULTS: Of 815 patients undergoing DBS implantation over a 12-year period, 31 were children (mean age at surgery 13.2 years old, range 4-17 years old). Diagnoses included the following: DYT1 primary dystonia (autosomal dominant, Tor1ADELTAGAG mutation, 10 cases), non-DYT1 primary dystonia (3 cases), secondary dystonia (11 cases), neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation (NBIA, 3 cases), levodopa-responsive parkinsonism (2 cases), Lesch-Nyhan disease (1 case), and glutaric aciduria Type 1 (1 case). Six children ages 15-17 years old underwent awake microelectrode-guided surgery. For 25 children operated under general anesthesia, the surgical technique evolved from microelectrode-guided surgery to image-guided surgeries using real-time intraoperative MR imaging or CT for lead location confirmation. Complications included 5 hardware infections, all in children younger than 10 years old. At 1 year after implantation, patients with DYT1 dystonia had a mean improvement in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale movement subscore of 75%, while those with secondary dystonia had only small improvements. Outcomes in the 3 children with NBIA were disappointing. CONCLUSIONS: Results of DBS in children with primary and secondary dystonias were similar to those in adults, with excellent results for DYT1 dystonia in children without fixed orthopedic deformity and much more modest results in secondary dystonia. In contrast to reported experience in adults with NBIA, these results in children with NBIA were poor. Infection risk was highest in the youngest patients.

Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).