G485 Emergency Care Planning – Are We Discussing It, Are We Recording It, And Are We Acting On It? An Audit Of Ecp Implementation In Children With Life Limiting Conditions
Title
G485 Emergency Care Planning – Are We Discussing It, Are We Recording It, And Are We Acting On It? An Audit Of Ecp Implementation In Children With Life Limiting Conditions
Creator
G Artis; C Cunningham; R Halpin-Evans; Hain R
Identifier
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-310863.472
Publisher
Archives Of Disease In Childhood
Date
2016
Description
Aim The use of Emergency care plans (ECPs) is recommended by ‘Together for Short Lives’, (TFSL) to prevent inappropriate escalation to futile interventions in children with incurable life-limiting conditions (LLC).
The aim was to assess compliance with TSFL guidelines for ECP in children on a High-Dependency Unit (HDU), at a large children’s hospital:
proportion of children with completed ECPs
whether care during an acute episode was consistent with ECP
Methods Children with LLCs admitted to HDU over a 6 month period were identified. Underlying condition; reason for admission; record of discussion of end-of-life (EoL) preferences; HDU treatment; escalation to PICU.
Results 45 patients were evaluable. Fourteen (31.1%) patient notes recorded EoL preference. (24.4% completed ECP, 6.7% discussion alone). In two cases preferences were not followed because situation changed (1 parental wishes, 1 alternative intervention). 3/11 ECPs were physical hard copies in the notes that would be sought in an emergency, five could not be located.
Conclusions Documentation of preference in EoL care should be accessible in 100% of patients with LLC admitted to HDU. That target was not reached. For most, there was no record of any EoL discussion. Documentation was mis-filed in many cases, potentially rendering it difficult to access at crucial points in patient care. Where ECPs were in place, they were followed unless there was a reason for deviation.
The aim was to assess compliance with TSFL guidelines for ECP in children on a High-Dependency Unit (HDU), at a large children’s hospital:
proportion of children with completed ECPs
whether care during an acute episode was consistent with ECP
Methods Children with LLCs admitted to HDU over a 6 month period were identified. Underlying condition; reason for admission; record of discussion of end-of-life (EoL) preferences; HDU treatment; escalation to PICU.
Results 45 patients were evaluable. Fourteen (31.1%) patient notes recorded EoL preference. (24.4% completed ECP, 6.7% discussion alone). In two cases preferences were not followed because situation changed (1 parental wishes, 1 alternative intervention). 3/11 ECPs were physical hard copies in the notes that would be sought in an emergency, five could not be located.
Conclusions Documentation of preference in EoL care should be accessible in 100% of patients with LLC admitted to HDU. That target was not reached. For most, there was no record of any EoL discussion. Documentation was mis-filed in many cases, potentially rendering it difficult to access at crucial points in patient care. Where ECPs were in place, they were followed unless there was a reason for deviation.
Rights
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Citation List Month
September 2016 List
Citation
G Artis; C Cunningham; R Halpin-Evans; Hain R, “G485 Emergency Care Planning – Are We Discussing It, Are We Recording It, And Are We Acting On It? An Audit Of Ecp Implementation In Children With Life Limiting Conditions,” Pediatric Palliative Care Library, accessed April 19, 2024, https://pedpalascnetlibrary.omeka.net/items/show/10674.