1
40
1
-
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
April 2021 List
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Citation List Month
April 2021 List
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15828" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15828</a>
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Swiss neonatal caregivers express diverging views on parental involvement in shared decision-making for extremely premature infants
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Acta Paediatrica
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2021
Subject
The topic of the resource
shared decision-making; attitudes; extremely premature infants; neonatal healthcare professionals; parental authority
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Fauchère JC; Klein SD; Hendriks MJ; Baumann-Hölzle R; Berger TMB; Bucher HU
Description
An account of the resource
AIM: Due to scarce available national data, this study assessed current attitudes of neonatal caregivers regarding decisions on life-sustaining interventions, and their views on parents' aptitude to express their infant's best interest in shared decision-making. METHODS: Self-administered web-based quantitative empirical survey. All 552 experienced neonatal physicians and nurses from all Swiss NICUs were eligible. RESULTS: There was a high degree of agreement between physicians and nurses (response rates 79% and 70%, respectively) that the ability for social interactions was a minimal criterion for an acceptable quality of life. A majority stated that the parents' interests are as important as the child's best interest in shared decision-making. Only a minority considered the parents as the best judges of what is their child's best interest. Significant differences in attitudes and values emerged between neonatal physicians and nurses. The language area was very strongly associated with the attitudes of neonatal caregivers. CONCLUSION: Despite clear legal requirements and societal expectations for shared decision-making, survey respondents demonstrated a gap between their expressed commitment to shared decision-making and their view on parental aptitude to formulate their infant's best interest. National guidelines need to address these barriers to shared decision-making to promote a more uniform nationwide practice.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15828" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1111/apa.15828</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2021
Acta Paediatrica
April 2021 List
Attitudes
Baumann-Hölzle R
Berger TMB
Bucher HU
extremely premature infants
Fauchère JC
Hendriks MJ
Klein SD
neonatal healthcare professionals
parental authority
Shared Decision-making