Best Practice In Provider/Parent Interaction
Pediatrics; Quality; Parents Experiences; Communication; Hospital Staff; Pediatric Palliative Care; Grounded Theory; Social Sciences; Biomedical; Family Perspectives; Qualitative Analysis; Empathy; Medicine; Practice Guidelines; Childs Death; Canada; Social Sciences; Interdisciplinary; Patient-provider; Reflection; Information Science & Library Science; Palliative Care; Relationships; Best Practice
In this 3-year prospective grounded theory study in three pediatric settings, we aimed to develop a conceptualization of best practice health care providers (BPHCPs) in interaction with parents of children with complex, chronic, life-threatening conditions. Analysis of semistructured interviews with 34 parents and 80 health care professionals (HCPs) and 88 observation periods of HCP/parent interactions indicated that BPHCPs shared a broad worldview; values of equity, family-centered care, and integrity; and a commitment to authentic engagement. BPHCPs engaged in direct care activities, in connecting behaviors, and in exquisitely attuning to particularities of the situation in the moment, resulting in positive outcomes for parents and HCPs. By focusing on what HCPs do well, findings showed that not only is it possible for HCPs to practice in this way, but those who do so are also recognized as being the best at what they do. We provide recommendations for practice and initial and ongoing professional education.
Davies B; Steele R; Krueger G; Albersheim S; Baird J; Bifirie M; Cadell S; Doane G; Garga D; Siden H; Strahlendorf C; Zhao Y
Qualitative Health Research
2016
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316664712" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1177/1049732316664712</a>
Using colors to assess pain in toddlers: validation of "the rainbow pain scale"-a proof-of-principle study.
Color; Age Factors; Child; Child Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Inpatients/psychology; Male; Neoplasms/psychology; Oncology; Oncology Nursing/methods; Outpatients/psychology; Pain; Pain/diagnosis/psychology; Pain Measurement/methods; Pain Scale; Pediatric Nursing/methods; Preschool Children; Psychometrics/instrumentation; Self Report
Self-report, when available, is considered the ideal way to assess the intensity and other aspects of pain in children. However, self-report scales are often too complex cognitively for preschool-aged children (2-4 years). The Rainbow Pain Scale (RPS) was developed to provide individualized self-reported pain ratings for preschool-aged children. The psychometric properties of this scale have yet to be evaluated. To ensure validity, our first step was to compare RPS scores to a well-validated scale in older children who were able to self-report their pain. The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of the RPS in children aged 5 to 10 years as proof of principle. We compared ratings of 49 children's pain using the RPS with those on the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). Participants suffering from pain related to cancer and cancer treatment were recruited to complete both scales at 3 time points, during both inpatient and outpatient clinic visits. Pearson's r and Cohen's kappa were used to evaluate the level of association between the scales. The association between RPS and the
Mahon P; Holsti L; Siden H; Strahlendorf C; Turnham L; Giaschi D
Journal Of Pediatric Oncology Nursing : Official Journal Of The Association Of Pediatric Oncology Nurses
2014
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/1043454214555197" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1177/1043454214555197</a>
Using Colors to Assess Pain in Toddlers: Validation of "The Rainbow Pain Scale"-A Proof-of-Principle Study
Self-report, when available, is considered the ideal way to assess the intensity and other aspects of pain in children. However, self-report scales are often too complex cognitively for preschool-aged children (2-4 years). The Rainbow Pain Scale (RPS) was developed to provide individualized self-reported pain ratings for preschool-aged children. The psychometric properties of this scale have yet to be evaluated. To ensure validity, our first step was to compare RPS scores to a well-validated scale in older children who were able to self-report their pain. The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of the RPS in children aged 5 to 10 years as proof of principle. We compared ratings of 49 children's pain using the RPS with those on the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). Participants suffering from pain related to cancer and cancer treatment were recruited to complete both scales at 3 time points, during both inpatient and outpatient clinic visits. Pearson's r and Cohen's κ were used to evaluate the level of association between the scales. The association between RPS and the FPS-R was greater than .7 at all 3 visits; r = .96 between the scales at the first clinic visit, .97 at the second visit, and .93 at the third visit. Cohen's κ between scales was 1.0 at the first clinic visit, .95 at the second visit, and .87 at the third visit. The RPS shows excellent concurrent validity with the FPS-R in school-aged children. The next step will be to examine the psychometric properties of the RPS in preschool-aged children.
2014-11
Mahon P; Holsti L; Siden H; Strahlendorf C; Turnham L; Giaschi D
Journal Of Pediatric Oncology Nursing
2014
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/1043454214555197" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1177/1043454214555197</a>