Pediatric End-of-Life Care in Rural America: A Systematic Review
systematic review; pediatric palliative care; pediatric end-of-life; pediatric hospice; rural health care; rural hospice
BACKGROUND: Families increasingly desire to bring their children home from the acute care setting at end of life. This transition includes home to rural or remote areas. Little is known about the end-of-life care for children who reside in rural areas. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively review and summarize the evidence regarding end-of-life care for children living in rural areas, identify key findings and gaps in the literature, and make recommendations for future research. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted from 2011 to 2021 using MEDLINE and CINAHL databases. RESULTS: Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Key themes from the literature included: barriers, facilitators, and needs. Three articles identified barriers to end-of-life care for children in rural communities, which included access to end-of-life care and clinicians trained to provide pediatric care. Three studies identified and evaluated the facilitators of end-of-life care for rural children. The articles identified technology and additional training as facilitators. Four studies reported on the needs of rural children for end-of-life care with serious illness. CONCLUSIONS: We found major barriers and unmet needs in the delivery of rural pediatric end-of-life care. A few facilitators in delivery of this type of care were explored. Overall research in this area was sparse. Future studies should focus on understanding the complexities associated with delivery of pediatric end-of-life care in rural areas.
Stone W; Keim-Malpass J; Cozad MJ; Fornehed MLC; Lindley LC
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
2021
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/10499091211064202" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1177/10499091211064202</a>
A National Study to Compare Effective Management of Constipation in Children Receiving Concurrent Versus Standard Hospice Care
Medicaid; constipation; pediatric hospice care; concurrent hospice care; pediatric end of life
Constipation is a distressing and uncomfortable symptom children experience at end of life. There is a gap in knowledge about how different approaches to hospice care delivery might improve pediatric symptom management of constipation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of pediatric concurrent hospice versus standard hospice care to manage constipation. Medicaid data (2011-2013) were analyzed. Children who were younger than 21 years enrolled in hospice care and had a hospice enrollment between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2013, were included. Instrumental variable analysis was used to test the effectiveness of concurrent versus standard hospice care. Among the 18 152 children, approximately 14% of participants were diagnosed or treated for constipation from a nonhospice provider during hospice enrollment. A higher proportion of children received nonhospice care for constipation in concurrent hospice care, compared with standard hospice (19.5% vs 13.2%), although this was not significant (β = .22, P < .05) after adjusting for covariates. The findings demonstrated that concurrent care was no more effective than standard hospice care in managing pediatric constipation. Hospice and nonhospice providers may be doing a sufficient job ordering bowel regimens before constipation becomes a serious problem for children at end of life.
Lindley LC; Keim-Malpass J; Cozad MJ; Mack JW; Svynarenko R; Fornehed MLC; Stone W; Qualls K; Hinds PS
Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing
2021
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1097/njh.0000000000000810" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1097/njh.0000000000000810</a>