1 40 1 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Citation List Month Backlog URL Address <a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-3-3" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">http://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-3-3</a> Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Consensus guidelines on analgesia and sedation in dying intensive care unit patients Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Bmc Medical Ethics Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2002 Subject The topic of the resource Humans; Intensive Care Units; Terminally Ill; Consensus; Euthanasia; Suicide; Stress; Empirical Approach; Death and Euthanasia; Practice Guidelines; Pain/drug therapy; Active; Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use; Assisted; Terminal Care/standards; Psychological/drug therapy; Analgesics/therapeutic use; Palliative Care/methods/standards Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Hawryluck LA; Harvey WR; Lemieux-Charles L; Singer PA Description An account of the resource BACKGROUND: Intensivists must provide enough analgesia and sedation to ensure dying patients receive good palliative care. However, if it is perceived that too much is given, they risk prosecution for committing euthanasia. The goal of this study is to develop consensus guidelines on analgesia and sedation in dying intensive care unit patients that help distinguish palliative care from euthanasia. METHODS: Using the Delphi technique, panelists rated levels of agreement with statements describing how analgesics and sedatives should be given to dying ICU patients and how palliative care should be distinguished from euthanasia. Participants were drawn from 3 panels: 1) Canadian Academic Adult Intensive Care Fellowship program directors and Intensive Care division chiefs (N = 9); 2) Deputy chief provincial coroners (N = 5); 3) Validation panel of Intensivists attending the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group meeting (N = 12). RESULTS: After three Delphi rounds, consensus was achieved on 16 statements encompassing the role of palliative care in the intensive care unit, the management of pain and suffering, current areas of controversy, and ways of improving palliative care in the ICU. CONCLUSION: Consensus guidelines were developed to guide the administration of analgesics and sedatives to dying ICU patients and to help distinguish palliative care from euthanasia. 2002 Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context <a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-3-3" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1186/1472-6939-3-3</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s). Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article 2002 Active Analgesics/therapeutic use Assisted Backlog Bmc Medical Ethics Consensus Death and Euthanasia Empirical Approach Euthanasia Harvey WR Hawryluck LA Humans Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use Intensive Care Units Journal Article Lemieux-Charles L Pain/drug Therapy Palliative Care/methods/standards Practice Guidelines Psychological/drug therapy Singer PA Stress Suicide Terminal Care/standards Terminally Ill