1
40
2
-
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
PedPalASCNet Member Publications
Subject
The topic of the resource
A collection of relevant articles published by one or more of PedPalASCNet's members
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111452" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111452</a>
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Optimising the process for conducting scoping reviews
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2021
Subject
The topic of the resource
Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; information science; Publications; Research Design; Q3 Scoping Review
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Pawliuk C; Brown HL; Widger K; Dewan T; Hermansen AM; Grégoire MC; Steele R; Siden H
Description
An account of the resource
Knowledge synthesis constitutes a key part of evidence-based medicine and a scoping review is a type of knowledge synthesis that maps the breadth of literature on a topic. Conducting a scoping review is resource intensive and, as a result, it can be challenging to maintain best practices throughout the process. Much of the current guidance describes a scoping review framework or broad ways to conduct a scoping review. However, little detailed guidance exists on how to complete each stage to optimise the process. We present five recommendations based on our experience when conducting a particularly challenging scoping review: (1) engage the expertise of a librarian throughout the process, (2) conduct a truly systematic search, (3) facilitate communication and collaboration, (4) explore new tools or repurpose old ones, and (5) test every stage of the process. These recommendations add to the literature by providing specific and detailed advice on each stage of a scoping review. Our intent is for these recommendations to aid other teams that are undertaking knowledge synthesis projects.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111452" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111452</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2021
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Brown HL
Dewan T
Evidence-based Medicine
Grégoire MC
Hermansen AM
Humans
information science
Pawliuk C
Publications
Q3 Scoping Review
Research Design
Siden H
Steele R
Widger K
-
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Citation List Month
July 2017 List
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Caring Decisions: The Development Of A Written Resource For Parents Facing End-of-life Decisions
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Journal Of Palliative Medicine
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2015
Subject
The topic of the resource
Adult;Advance Care Planning/ethics;Advance Care Planning/standards;Attitude Of Health Personnel;Australia;Child;Consumer Health Information/methods;Decision Making/ethics;Humans;Internet;Parents/education;Parents/psychology;Pilot Projects;Professional-family Relations;Publications;Terminal Care/methods;Terminal Care/standards
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Xafis V; Gillam L; Hynson J; Sullivan J; Cossich M; Wilkinson D
Description
An account of the resource
BACKGROUND: Written resources in adult intensive care have been shown to benefit families facing end of life (EoL) decisions. There are few resources for parents making EoL decisions for their child and no existing resources addressing ethical issues. The Caring Decisions handbook and website were developed to fill these gaps. AIM: We discuss the development of the resources, modification after reviewer feedback and findings from initial pilot implementation. DESIGN: A targeted literature review-to identify resources and factors that impact on parental EoL decision-making; development phase-guided by the literature and the researchers' expertise; consultation process-comprised a multi-disciplinary panel of experts and parents; pilot evaluation study-hard-copy handbook was distributed as part of routine care at an Australian Children's Hospital. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Twelve experts and parents formed the consultation panel. Eight parents of children with life-limiting conditions and clinicians were interviewed in the pilot study. RESULTS: Numerous factors supporting/impeding EoL decisions were identified. Caring Decisions addressed issues identified in the literature and by the multidisciplinary research team. The consultation panel provided overwhelmingly positive feedback. Pilot study parents found the resources helpful and comforting. Most clinicians viewed the resources as very beneficial to parents and identified them as ideal for training purposes. CONCLUSIONS: The development of the resources addressed many of the gaps in existing resources. The consultation process and the pilot study suggest these resources could be of significant benefit to parents and clinicians.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
10.1089/jpm.2015.0048
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2015
Adult
Advance Care Planning/ethics
Advance Care Planning/standards
Attitude Of Health Personnel
Australia
Child
Consumer Health Information/methods
Cossich M
Decision Making/ethics
Gillam L
Humans
Hynson J
Internet
Journal of Palliative Medicine
July 2017 List
Parents/education
Parents/psychology
Pilot Projects
Professional-family Relations
Publications
Sullivan J
Terminal Care/methods
Terminal Care/standards
Wilkinson D
Xafis V