Psychiatric morbidity in children with medically unexplained chronic pain: diagnosis from the pediatrician's perspective
Child; Humans; Pediatrics; Questionnaires; Psychometrics; adolescent; Psychological; PedPal Lit; Chronic disease; Interview; Mental Disorders/complications/diagnosis; Pain/psychology
CONTEXT: There is very little general evidence to support the clinical management, particularly diagnosis, of medically unexplained chronic pain (UCP) in children. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess in children with UCP if clinical characteristics held important by general pediatricians help to accurately diagnose psychiatric morbidity and, alternatively, if the same can be achieved using dedicated questionnaires. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional diagnostic study in a pediatric outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Our participants were 134 patients, aged 8 to 18 years, who were referred for UCP. Performed were (1) diagnostic test reflecting the pediatricians' choice of clinical characteristics and (2) selected questionnaires. Classification was performed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, by a child psychiatrist using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Parent Version IV and the Semi-structured Clinical Interview for Children and Adolescents. Results were analyzed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Psychiatric morbidity was present in 80 of the children. A minority had a medical explanation for the pain (15% definite, 17% probable). The clinical diagnostic model included age, social-problem indicators, family structure, parental somatization, and school problems. In the quintile of children in whom this model predicted the highest risk, 93% indeed had psychiatric morbidity at reference testing. In the quintile with the lowest predicted risk, indeed only 27% had psychiatric morbidity. The Dutch Personality Inventory for Youth and the Child Behavior Checklist matched the pediatricians' choice of clinical characteristics. In the quintile of children with the highest predicted risk based on these questionnaires, 89% had psychiatric morbidity. In the quintile with the lowest predicted risk, only 15% had psychiatric morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: A pediatrician-chosen set of clinical characteristics of children with UCP proves useful in diagnosing psychiatric morbidity. Using selected questionnaire screening yields similar results.
2006
Konijnenberg AY; de Graeff-Meeder ER; van der Hoeven J; Kimpen JL; Buitelaar JK; Uiterwaal CS
Pediatrics
2006
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
I am not the kind of woman who complains of everything': illness stories on self and shame in women with chronic pain
Female; Humans; Adult; Attitude to Health; Middle Aged; Chronic disease; Feminism; Narration; Pain/psychology
In this study, we explore issues of self and shame in illness accounts from women with chronic pain. We focused on how these issues within their stories were shaped according to cultural discourses of gender and disease. A qualitative study was conducted with in-depth interviews including a purposeful sampling of 10 women of varying ages and backgrounds with chronic muscular pain. The women described themselves in various ways as 'strong', and expressed their disgust regarding talk of illness of other women with similar pain. The material was interpreted within a feminist frame of reference, inspired by narrative theory and discourse analysis. We read the women's descriptions of their own (positive) strength and the (negative) illness talk of others as a moral plot and argumentation, appealing to a public audience of health personnel, the general public, and the interviewer: As a plot, their stories attempt to cope with psychological and alternative explanations of the causes of their pain. As performance, their stories attempt to cope with the scepticism and distrust they report having been met with. Finally, as arguments, their stories attempt to convince us about the credibility of their pain as real and somatic rather than imagined or psychological. In several ways, the women negotiated a picture of themselves that fits with normative, biomedical expectations of what illness is and how it should be performed or lived out in 'storied form' according to a gendered work of credibility as woman and as ill. Thus, their descriptions appear not merely in terms of individual behaviour, but also as organized by medical discourses of gender and diseases. Behind their stories, we hear whispered accounts relating to the medical narrative about hysteria; rejections of the stereotype medical discourse of the crazy, lazy, illness-fixed or weak woman.
2004
Werner A; Isaksen LW; Malterud K
Social Science & Medicine
2004
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.12.001" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.12.001</a>
The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine
Humans; Emotions; Sick Role; Holistic Health; Philosophy; Medical; Therapeutics; Disease; Research Support; U.S. Gov't; Philosophy; Pain/psychology; Non-P.H.S.; Patients/psychology
The question of suffering and its relation to organic illness has rarely been addressed in the medical literature. This article offers a description of the nature and causes of suffering in patients undergoing medical treatment. A distinction based on clinical observations is made between suffering and physical distress. Suffering is experienced by persons, not merely by bodies, and has its source in challenges that threaten the intactness of the person as a complex social and psychological entity. Suffering can include physical pain but is by no means limited to it. The relief of suffering and the cure of disease must be seen as twin obligations of a medical profession that is truly dedicated to the care of the sick. Physicians' failure to understand the nature of suffering can result in medical intervention that (though technically adequate) not only fails to relieve suffering but becomes a source of suffering itself.
1982
Cassel EJ
The New England Journal Of Medicine
1982
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198203183061104" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1056/nejm198203183061104</a>
Listening To Parents: The Role Of Symptom Perception In Pediatric Palliative Home Care
Adult; Cross-sectional Studies; Death; Dyspnea/diagnosis; Dyspnea/psychology; Female; Home Care Services/standards; Humans; Male; Pain/diagnosis; Pain/psychology; Palliative Care/methods; Palliative Care/psychology; Parents/psychology; Pediatrics/methods; Perception; Quality Of Life/psychology; Retrospective Studies; Surveys And Questionnaires; Symptom Assessment/psychology
End-of-life Symptoms; Pediatric Palliative Home Care; Symptom Perception
OBJECTIVE:
This study analyzes symptom perception by parents and healthcare professionals and the quality of symptom management in a pediatric palliative home care setting and identifies which factors contribute to a high quality of palliative and end-of-life care for children.
METHODS:
In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, parents were surveyed at the earliest three months after their child's death. All children were cared for by a specialized home pediatric palliative care team that provides a 24/7 medical on-call service. Questionnaires assessed symptom prevalence and intensity during the child's last month of life as perceived by parents, symptom perception, and treatment by medical staff. The responses were correlated with essential palliative care outcome measures (e.g., satisfaction with the care provided, quality-of-life of affected children and parents, and peacefulness of the dying phase).
RESULTS:
Thirty-eight parent dyads participated (return rate 84%; 35% oncological disorders). According to parental report, dyspnea (61%) and pain (58%) were the dominant symptoms with an overall high symptom load (83%). Pain, agitation, and seizures could be treated more successfully than other symptoms. Successful symptom perception was achieved in most cases and predicted the quality of symptom treatment (R 2, 0.612). Concordant assessment of symptom severity between parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs) improved the satisfaction with the care provided (p = 0.037) as well as the parental quality-of-life (p = 0.041). Even in cases with unsuccessful symptom control, parents were very satisfied with the SHPPC team's care (median 10; numeric rating scale 0-10) and rated the child's death as highly peaceful (median 9). Significance of the results: The quality and the concordance of symptom perception between parents and HCPs essentially influence parental quality-of-life as well as parental satisfaction and constitute a predictive factor for the quality of symptom treatment and palliative care.
Vollenbroich R; Borasio GD; Duroux A; Grasser M; Brandstatter M; Fuhrer M
Palliative & Supportive Care
2016
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
DOI: 10.1017/S1478951515000462