Crying out in pain-A systematic review into the validity of vocalization as an indicator for pain
Child; Humans; Aged; Aged 80 and over; Pain Measurement; Crying; Pain/diagnosis
BACKGROUND: Vocalization is often used to assess pain, sometimes combined with other behaviours such as facial expressions. Contrary to facial expressions, however, for vocalization, there is little evidence available on the association with pain. The aim of this systematic review was to critically analyse the association between vocalization and pain, to explore if vocalizations can be used as a "stand-alone" indicator for pain. METHODS: The search was performed according to the Prisma Guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. The following terms were used: "Pain Measurement," "Vocalization" and "Verbalization." The study population included verbal and non-verbal individuals, including older people and children. The search was performed in three different databases: PubMed, Embase and CINAHL. A total of 35 studies were selected for detailed investigation. Quality assessments were made using two grading systems: Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation system and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: An association between vocalization and pain was found in most studies, particularly when different types of vocalizations were included in the investigation. Different types of vocalization, but also different types of pain, shape this association. The association is observed within all groups of individuals, although age, amongst others, may have an influence on preferred type of vocalization. CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between vocalization and pain. However, vocalization as a "stand-alone" indicator for pain indicates only a limited aspect of this multifactorial phenomenon. Using vocalization as an indicator for pain may be more reliable if other pain indicators are also taken into account. SIGNIFICANCE: Vocalizations are frequently used in pain scales, although not yet thoroughly investigated as a "single indicator" for pain, like, e.g. facial expression. This review confirms the role of vocalizations in pain scales, and stresses that vocalizations might be more reliable if used in combination with other pain indicators.
Helmer LML; Weijenberg RAF; de Vries R; Achterberg WP; Lautenbacher S; Sampson EL; Lobbezoo F
European Journal of Pain
2020
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1623" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1002/ejp.1623</a>
Methadone Conversion In Infants
And Children: Retrospective Cohort Study Of 199 Pediatric Inpatients.
Administration Oral; Adolescent; Age Factors; Analgesics Opioid/administration & Dosage; Analgesics Opioid/adverse Effects; Child; Child Preschool; Consciousness/drug Effects; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Monitoring; Drug Overdose/etiology; Drug Substitution; Hospitals Pediatric; Humans; Infant; Infant Newborn; Inpatients; Intubation Intratracheal; Methadone/administration & Dosage; Methadone/adverse Effects; Minnesota; Pain/diagnosis; Pain/drug Therapy; Pharmacy Service Hospital; Respiration Artificial; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/etiology; Tertiary Care Centers; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Substances; Analgesics Opioid; Methadone
OBJECTIVE:
Methadone administration has increased in pediatric clinical settings. This review is an attempt to ascertain an equianalgesic dose ratio for methadone in the pediatric population using standard adult dose conversion guidelines.
SETTING:
US tertiary children's hospital.
PATIENTS:
Hospitalized pediatric patients, 0-18 years of age.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who were converted from their initial opioid therapy regimen (morphine, hydromorphone, and/or fentanyl) to methadone. The primary endpoint was whether or not a dose correction was needed for methadone in the 6 days following conversion using standard dose conversion charts for adults. Documented clinical signs of withdrawal, unrelieved pain, or oversedation were examined.
RESULTS:
The majority (53.7 percent) of the 199 children were converted to methadone on intensive care units prior extubation or postextubation. The mean conversion ratio was 23.7 mg of oral morphine to 1 mg of oral methadone (median, 18.8 mg:1 mg, SD=25.7). Most patients experienced an adequate conversion (n=115, 57.8 percent), while 83 (41.7 percent) appeared undermedicated, and one child was oversedated. There were no associations found with conversion ratios for initial morphine dose, days to conversion, or effect of withdrawal of concomitant agents with potential for withdrawal.
CONCLUSIONS:
Opioid conversion to methadone is commonly practiced at our institution; however, dosing was significantly lower compared to adult conversion ratios, and more than 40 percent of children were undermedicated. The majority of children in this study received opioids for sedation while intubated and ventilated; therefore, safe and efficacious pediatric methadone conversion rates remain unclear. Prospective studies are needed.
Fife A; Postier A; Flood A; Friedrichsdorf SJ
Journal Of Opioid Management
2016
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Listening To Parents: The Role Of Symptom Perception In Pediatric Palliative Home Care
Adult; Cross-sectional Studies; Death; Dyspnea/diagnosis; Dyspnea/psychology; Female; Home Care Services/standards; Humans; Male; Pain/diagnosis; Pain/psychology; Palliative Care/methods; Palliative Care/psychology; Parents/psychology; Pediatrics/methods; Perception; Quality Of Life/psychology; Retrospective Studies; Surveys And Questionnaires; Symptom Assessment/psychology
End-of-life Symptoms; Pediatric Palliative Home Care; Symptom Perception
OBJECTIVE:
This study analyzes symptom perception by parents and healthcare professionals and the quality of symptom management in a pediatric palliative home care setting and identifies which factors contribute to a high quality of palliative and end-of-life care for children.
METHODS:
In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, parents were surveyed at the earliest three months after their child's death. All children were cared for by a specialized home pediatric palliative care team that provides a 24/7 medical on-call service. Questionnaires assessed symptom prevalence and intensity during the child's last month of life as perceived by parents, symptom perception, and treatment by medical staff. The responses were correlated with essential palliative care outcome measures (e.g., satisfaction with the care provided, quality-of-life of affected children and parents, and peacefulness of the dying phase).
RESULTS:
Thirty-eight parent dyads participated (return rate 84%; 35% oncological disorders). According to parental report, dyspnea (61%) and pain (58%) were the dominant symptoms with an overall high symptom load (83%). Pain, agitation, and seizures could be treated more successfully than other symptoms. Successful symptom perception was achieved in most cases and predicted the quality of symptom treatment (R 2, 0.612). Concordant assessment of symptom severity between parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs) improved the satisfaction with the care provided (p = 0.037) as well as the parental quality-of-life (p = 0.041). Even in cases with unsuccessful symptom control, parents were very satisfied with the SHPPC team's care (median 10; numeric rating scale 0-10) and rated the child's death as highly peaceful (median 9). Significance of the results: The quality and the concordance of symptom perception between parents and HCPs essentially influence parental quality-of-life as well as parental satisfaction and constitute a predictive factor for the quality of symptom treatment and palliative care.
Vollenbroich R; Borasio GD; Duroux A; Grasser M; Brandstatter M; Fuhrer M
Palliative & Supportive Care
2016
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
DOI: 10.1017/S1478951515000462