Procedural burden experienced by children with cancer during their terminal hospital admission
acute respiratory failure; adolescent; amputation; article; artificial ventilation; bone marrow biopsy; bone marrow transplantation; brain ventricle peritoneum shunt; cancer palliative therapy; central nervous system tumor; central venous catheter; child; childhood cancer; cohort analysis; craniotomy; debridement; disease burden; excision; fasciotomy; female; heart arrest; heart surgery; hospital admission; human; intestine resection; invasive procedure; laparoscopy; length of stay; leukemia; lobectomy; major clinical study; male; myringotomy; ostomy; pain; priority journal; public health insurance; retrospective study; segmentectomy; sepsis; spine fusion; stem cell transplantation; terminal care; thoracoscopy; thoracotomy; vascular access; ventriculostomy
Background: Children with chronic conditions, including cancer, have been shown to have high-intensity end-of-life care. We assessed the frequency and timing of invasive procedures that children with cancer undergo during their terminal hospital admission (THA).
Corkum K S; Lautz T B; Hebal F N; Rowell E E
Journal of Pediatric Surgery
2019
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.007" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.007</a>
In What Circumstances Will A Neonatologist Decide A Patient Is Not A Resuscitation Candidate?
Futility; Intensive Care; Social Issues; Social Sciences; Biomedical; Ethics Medical; Slow Code; Uncertainty; Neonatologists; Practice; Decision Making; Analysis; Do-not-resuscitate Orders; Decision Making; Intensive Care; Pediatrics; Ethics; Pulmonary Arteries; Ostomy; Palliative Care; Medical Prognosis
End-of-life Care; Foetal Viability; Neonatology; Newborns And Minors; Palliative Care
Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the opinions of practising neonatologists regarding the ethical permissibility of unilateral Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) decisions in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Study design An anonymous survey regarding the permissibility of unilateral DNAR orders for three clinical vignettes was sent to members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Perinatal Medicine.
Results There were 490 out of a possible 3000 respondents (16%). A majority (76%) responded that a unilateral DNAR decision would be permissible in cases for which survival was felt to be impossible. A minority (25%) responded ‘yes’ when asked if a unilateral DNAR order would be permissible based solely on neurological prognosis.
Conclusions A majority of neonatologists believed unilateral DNAR decisions are ethically permissible if survival is felt to be impossible, but not permissible based solely on poor neurological prognosis. This has significant implications for clinical care.
Peter Daniel Murray; Denise Esserman; Mark Randolph Mercurio
Journal Of Medical Ethics
2016
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102941