Unrealistic parental expectations for cure in poor-prognosis childhood cancer
child; human; patient care; controlled study; female; major clinical study; male; cohort analysis; article; priority journal; childhood cancer; cancer recurrence; quality of life; confidence interval; cancer palliative therapy; interpersonal communication; expectation; clinical decision making; parental behavior; prospective study; cancer prognosis; neuroblastoma; questionnaire; medical record; pediatric patient; cancer risk; theoretical model; high risk population; odds ratio
Background: Many parents of children with advanced cancer pursue curative goals when cure is no longer possible. To the authors' knowledge, no pediatric studies to date have prospectively evaluated prognosis communication or influences on decision making in poor-prognosis childhood cancer.
Mack J W; Cronin A M; Uno H; Shusterman S; Twist C J; Bagatell R; Rosenberg A; Marachelian A; Granger M M; Glade Bender J; Baker J N; Park J; Cohn S L; Levine A; Taddei S; Diller L R
Cancer
2020
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32553" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1002/cncr.32553</a>
Vulnerable Populations Receiving Palliative Radiation in a Children's Hospital: Reporting on the Underreported
adult; anesthesia; Asia; cancer radiotherapy; central nervous system tumor; child; conference abstract; controlled study; death; electronic medical record; employer; female; follow up; fraud; housing; human; immigration; lowest income group; major clinical study; male; medical record review; mental stress; neuroblastoma; organization; pain; poverty; race; radiation oncologist; radiotherapy; retrospective study; rhabdomyosarcoma; school child; South and Central America; terminal care; vulnerable population; young adult
Purpose/Objective(s): Few studies have examined the use of palliative radiation therapy (RT) in the pediatric population. This single institution study is one of the largest series reported of palliative RT practice patterns prior to and within the last month of life with a focus on vulnerable and underserved pediatric patients. Materials/Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients treated from 2008-2017 identified patients treated with radiotherapy with palliative intent. Demographic, diagnosis, and treatment parameters were collected from the electronic medical records. Vital status was recorded at date of death or last follow-up. Vulnerable patients were defined as belonging to a minority, adolescent and young adult (AYA), special needs, or low income population. Result(s): Of the 1092 patients treated with RT, 108 were identified as having received 227 treatments with palliative intent. Forty-five patients (42%) were female and 63 (58%) were male. The median age at the time of the first course of radiation was 11 years (range 0-25). Central nervous system (CNS) disturbance was the most common indication (n=50, 46%) followed by pain (n=44, 41%). Top primary diagnoses included CNS neoplasm (n=30, 37%), neuroblastoma (n=20, 19%), and rhabdomyosarcoma or other sarcoma (n=11, 10%). Forty-four percent were treated with anesthesia for at least one course of radiation. The median time from last course of RT to date of last follow-up was 3 months (range 0-105), and 25 patients (23%) received radiation in the last month of life. Eighty-two (76%) patients were deceased at time of review. The vulnerable constituted the overwhelming majority of the 108, only 13 (11.5%) were not. Patients were classified in the following individual categories: minority (n=90, 83.3%), AYA (n=34, 30%), special needs (n=10, 8.8%), or low income (n=70, 62%). Eight patients initially came seeking cancer treatment not available in Asia or Latin America. Latinos (n=66, 61%) were numerous and diverse, 12% were mixed race, and 18% had employer-based coverage. The most common vulnerable patients were Latin children from low income families (n=40, 35%). Obstacles to care included the immigration system, limited English, discrimination, cultural barriers, and poverty with job, transportation, and housing insecurity. Safety net and charitable organizations had scarce resources and rules intended to reduce fraud and abuse further limited access. Parents reported these challenges amplified the great psychological distress felt after the death of a child. Conclusion(s): This is the first report to document the vulnerable pediatric and AYA population receiving palliative radiation therapy at a large urban hospital. Almost a quarter of patients received treatment in the last month of life. Most commonly, a vulnerable child was Latinx from a low income family. Further investigation is needed to guide radiation oncologists on the delivery of optimal end-of-life care and address barriers to care in this population. Copyright © 2019
Wong K; Hwang L; Liu K X; Lee H J; Olch A J
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
2019
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.1497" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.1497</a>
Acute pain relief after Mantram meditation in children with neuroblastoma undergoing anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody therapy
adolescent; Child; Female; Humans; Male; retrospective studies; Pain; Neuroblastoma; Antineoplastic Agents; Preschool; Meditation; Antibodies; Gangliosides; Monoclonal
Nonpharmacologic, mind-body interventions are used to reduce anxiety in pediatric patients. Anti-ganglioside GD2 monoclonal antibody (anti-GD2 MoAb 3F8) therapy is the standard of care for high-risk neuroblastoma and pain is its major side effect. We performed a retrospective analysis of children undergoing anti-GD2 MoAb 3F8 treatment who received guided meditation. Meditation involved concentrating on the repetition of rhythmic, melodic sounds purported to slow breathing and induce a relaxation response. A total of 71% patients completed a session at first (n=19) or second attempt (n=5). Patients received fewer analgesic doses to manage anti-GD2 MoAb 3F8-induced pain when participating in meditation (n=17, mean=-0.4 dose, P<0.01). Mantram meditation is a feasible outpatient intervention associated with reduced analgesic requirements.
2014-03
Ahmed M; Modak S; Sequeira S
Journal Of Pediatric Hematology/oncology
2014
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000000024" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1097/MPH.0000000000000024</a>
Practice patterns of palliative radiation therapy in pediatric oncology patients in an international pediatric research consortium
Childhood Cancer/rt [radiotherapy]; Palliative Therapy; Anesthesia; Article; Brain Metastasis; Cancer Patient; Child; Cone Beam Computed Tomography; Conformal Radiotherapy; Electron Therapy; Ependymoma; Ewing Sarcoma; Health Survey; Histopathology; Human; Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy; Intestine Obstruction; Leukemia; Lymphoma; Major Clinical Study; Malignant Neoplasm; Medulloblastoma; Metastasis; Neuroblastoma; Osteosarcoma; Pain; Primary Tumor; Priority Journal; Proton Therapy; Radiation Dose Fractionation; Radiosensitivity; Re-irradiation; Respiratory Tract Disease; Rhabdomyosarcoma; Spinal Cord Compression; Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy; Stomach Distension
Background/Objectives: The practice of palliative radiation therapy (RT) is based on extrapolation from adult literature. We evaluated patterns of pediatric palliative RT to describe regimens used to identify opportunity for future pediatric-specific clinical trials. Design/Methods: Six international institutions with pediatric expertise completed a 122-item survey evaluating patterns of palliative RT for patients <=21 years old from 2010 to 2015. Two institutions use proton RT. Palliative RT was defined as treatment with the goal of symptom control or prevention of immediate life-threatening progression. Results: Of 3,225 pediatric patients, 365 (11%) were treated with palliative intent to a total of 427 disease sites. Anesthesia was required in 10% of patients. Treatment was delivered to metastatic disease in 54% of patients. Histologies included neuroblastoma (30%), osteosarcoma (18%), leukemia/lymphoma (12%), rhabdomyosarcoma (12%), medulloblastoma/ependymoma (12%), Ewing sarcoma (8%), and other (8%). Indications included pain (43%), intracranial symptoms (23%), respiratory compromise (14%), cord compression (8%), and abdominal distention (6%). Sites included nonspine bone (35%), brain (16% primary tumors, 6% metastases), abdomen/pelvis (15%), spine (12%), head/neck (9%), and lung/mediastinum (5%). Re-irradiation comprised 16% of cases. Techniques employed three-dimensional conformal RT (41%), intensity-modulated RT (23%), conventional RT (26%), stereotactic body RT (6%), protons (1%), electrons (1%), and other (2%). The most common physician-reported barrier to consideration of palliative RT was the concern about treatment toxicity (83%). Conclusion: There is significant diversity of practice in pediatric palliative RT. Combined with ongoing research characterizing treatment response and toxicity, these data will inform the design of forthcoming clinical trials to establish effective regimens and minimize treatment toxicity for this patient population.
Rao AD; Chen Q; Ermoian RP; Alcorn SR; Figueiredo MLS; Chen MJ; Dieckmann K; MacDonald SM; Ladra MM; Kobyzeva D; Nechesnyuk AV; Nilsson K; Ford EC; Winey BA; Villar RC; Terezakis SA
Pediatric Blood And Cancer
2017
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26589" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1002/pbc.26589</a>