A post-mortem population survey on foetal-infantile end-of-life decisions: a research protocol
Neonates; End-of-life decisions; Mortality follow-back survey; Population-based; Stillbirths; Termination of pregnancy
BACKGROUND: The death of a child before or shortly after birth is frequently preceded by an end-of-life decision (ELD). Population-based studies of incidence and characteristics of ELDs in neonates and infants are rare, and those in the foetal-infantile period (> 22 weeks of gestation - 1 year) including both neonates and stillborns, are non-existent. However, important information is missed when decisions made before birth are overlooked. Our study protocol addresses this knowledge gap. METHODS: First, a new and encompassing framework was constructed to conceptualise ELDs in the foetal-infantile period. Next, a population mortality follow-back survey in Flanders (Belgium) was set up with physicians who certified all death certificates of stillbirths from 22 weeks of gestation onwards, and infants under the age of a year. Two largely similar questionnaires (stillbirths and neonates) were developed, pilot tested and validated, both including questions on ELDs and their preceding decision-making processes. Each death requires a postal questionnaire to be sent to the certifying physician. Anonymity of the child, parents and physician is ensured by a rigorous mailing procedure involving a lawyer as intermediary between death certificate authorities, physicians and researchers. Approval by medical societies, ethics and privacy commissions has been obtained. DISCUSSION: This research protocol is the first to study ELDs over the entire foetal-infantile period on a population level. Based on representative samples of deaths and stillbirths and applying a trustworthy anonymity procedure, the research protocol can be used in other countries, irrespective of legal frameworks around perinatal end-of-life decision-making.
Dombrecht L; Beernaert K; Roets E; Chambaere K; Cools F; Goossens L; Naulaers G; De Catte L; Cohen J; Deliens L
BMC Pediatrics
2018
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here.
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1218-4" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/s12887-018-1218-4</a>
Barriers and facilitators for parents in end-of-life decision-making for neonates at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A qualitative study
decision making; emotional regulation; intensive care units; neonatal; Neonatology; parents; qualitative research
BACKGROUND: Mortality and end-of-life decision-making can occur in newborns, especially within the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. For parents, participating in end-of-life decision-making is taxing. Knowledge is lacking on what support is helpful to parents during decision-making. AIM: To identify barriers and facilitators experienced by parents in making an end-of-life decision for their infant. DESIGN: Qualitative study using face-to-face semi-structured interviews. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed 23 parents with a child that died after an end-of-life decision at a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit between April and September 2018. RESULTS: Parents stated barriers and facilitators within 4 themes: 1. Clinical knowledge and prognosis; 2. Quality of information provision; 3. Emotion regulation; and 4. Psychosocial environment. Facilitators include knowing whether the prognosis includes long-term negative quality of life, knowing all treatment options, receiving information according to health literacy level, being able to process intense emotions, having experienced counseling and practical help. Barriers include a lack of general medical knowledge, being unprepared for a poor prognosis, having an uninformed psychologist. CONCLUSIONS: We found that clinical information and psychosocial support aid parents in decision-making. Information is best tailored to health literacy. Psychosocial support can be provided by experienced, informed counselors, social services and sibling support, distinguishing between verbal and non-verbal coping preferences, and calm, familiar architecture. Intense emotions may hinder absorption of clinical information, therefore interventions to aid emotion regulation and reduce cognitive load may be looked at in further research. Adjustment of the Situations, Opinions and Options, Parents, Information, Emotions framework based on our results can be evaluated.
Piette V; Dombrecht L; Deliens L; Cools F; Chambaere K; Goossens L; Naulaers G; Laroche S; Cornette L; Bekaert E; Decoster P; Beernaert K; Cohen J
Palliative Medicine
2022
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/02692163221076365" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1177/02692163221076365</a>
Neonatologists and neonatal nurses have positive attitudes towards perinatal end-of-life decisions, a nationwide survey
Surveys and Questionnaires; Newborn Infant; Pregnancy; Attitude of Health Personnel; Decision Making; Belgium; Terminal Care; Perinatal death; End-of-life decisions; Death; Termination of pregnancy; Neonatologists; Optimism; Attitude questionnaire; Attitudes of neonatologists and neonatal nurses; Neonatal Nurses
AIM: Perinatal death is often preceded by an end-of-life decision (ELD). Disparate hospital policies, complex legal frameworks and ethically difficult cases make attitudes important. This study investigated attitudes of neonatologists and nurses towards perinatal ELDs. METHODS: A survey was handed out to all neonatologists and neonatal nurses in all eight neonatal intensive care units in Flanders, Belgium in May 2017. Respondents indicated agreement with statements regarding perinatal ELDs on a Likert-scale and sent back questionnaires via mail. RESULTS: The response rate was 49.5% (302/610). Most neonatologists and nurses found nontreatment decisions such as withholding or withdrawing treatment acceptable (90-100%). Termination of pregnancy when the foetus is viable in cases of severe or lethal foetal problems was considered highly acceptable in both groups (80-98%). Physicians and nurses do not find different ELDs equally acceptable, e.g. nurses more often than physicians (74% vs 60%, p = 0.017) agree that it is acceptable in certain cases to administer medication with the explicit intention of hastening death. CONCLUSION: There was considerable support for both prenatal and neonatal ELDs, even for decisions that currently fall outside the Belgian legal framework. Differences between neonatologists' and nurses' attitudes indicate that both opinions should be heard during ELD-making.
Dombrecht L; Deliens L; Chambaere K; Baes S; Cools F; Goossens L; Naulaers G; Roets E; Piette V; Cohen J; Beernaert K
Acta Paediatrica
2020
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14797" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1111/apa.14797</a>