human; palliative therapy; pediatric patient; coping behavior; terminal care; bereavement; grief; medical specialist; health care system; bereavement support; breathing exercise; child life specialist; communication skill; cultural anthropology; family centered care; guided imagery; health care delivery; health personnel attitude; letter; medical procedures; Mexican; relaxation training; religion; scope of practice
Rights
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Apparent Life Threatening Event/th [therapy]; Life-sustaining Medical Treatment; Medical Procedures; Practice Guideline; Article; Awareness; Caregiver; Child Abuse; Child Care; Clinical Decision Making; Comatose Patient; Consensus; Consultation; Critical Illness/th [therapy]; Death; Death By Neurologic Criteria; Developmental Disorder/th [therapy]; Disease Burden; Disease Course; Ethical Decision Making; Extremely Low Gestational Age; Family Decision Making; Family Stress; Foster Care; Gestational Age; Goal Attainment; Health Belief; High Risk Population; Human; Hydration; Imminent Death; Informed Consent; Intensive Care; Interpersonal Communication; Legal Aspect; Medical Ethics; Medical Expert; Medical Information; Medically Administered Nutrition And Hydration; Medical Specialist; Neglect; Neurologic Disease/di [diagnosis]; Nutrition; Oxygenation; Pain/th [therapy]; Palliative Therapy; Patient Care Planning; Pediatrician; Priority Journal; Prognosis; Quality Of Life; Resuscitation; Shared Decision Making; Social Support; Spiritual Care; Survival; Teamwork; Terminal Care; Tissue Perfusion; Uncertain Prognosis
Description
Pediatric health care is practiced with the goal of promoting the best interests of the child. Treatment generally is rendered under a presumption in favor of sustaining life. However, in some circumstances, the balance of benefits and burdens to the child leads to an assessment that forgoing life-sustaining medical treatment (LSMT) is ethically supportable or advisable. Parents are given wide latitude in decision-making concerning end-of-life care for their children in most situations. Collaborative decision-making around LSMT is improved by thorough communication among all stakeholders, including medical staff, the family, and the patient, when possible, throughout the evolving course of the patient's illness. Clear communication of overall goals of care is advised to promote agreed-on plans, including resuscitation status. Perceived disagreement among the team of professionals may be stressful to families. At the same time, understanding the range of professional opinions behind treatment recommendations is critical to informing family decision-making. Input from specialists in palliative care, ethics, pastoral care, and other disciplines enhances support for families and medical staff when decisions to forgo LSMT are being considered. Understanding specific applicability of institutional, regional, state, and national regulations related to forgoing LSMT is important to practice ethically within existing legal frameworks. This guidance represents an update of the 1994 statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics on forgoing LSMT.
Rights
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Children are at times asked by clinicians or researchers to rate their pain associated with their past, future, or hypothetical experiences. However, little consideration is typically given to the cognitive-developmental requirements of such pain reports. Consequently, these pain assessment tasks may exceed the abilities of some children, potentially resulting in biased or random responses. This could lead to the over- or under-treatment of children's pain. This review provides an overview of factors, and specifically the cognitive-developmental prerequisites, that may affect a child's ability to report on nonpresent pain states, such as past, future, or hypothetical pain experiences. Children's ability to report on past pains may be influenced by developmental (age, cognitive ability), contextual (mood state, language used by significant others), affective and pain-related factors. The ability to mentally construct and report on future painful experiences may be shaped by memory of past experiences, information provision and learning, contextual factors, knowledge about oneself, cognitive coping style, and cognitive development. Hypothetical pain reports are sometimes used in the development and validation of pain assessment scales, as a tool in assessing cognitive-developmental and social-developmental aspects of children's reports of pain, and for the purposes of training children to use self-report scales. Rating pain associated with hypothetical pain scenarios requires the ability to recognize pain in another person and depends on the child's experience with pain. Enhanced understanding of cognitive-developmental requirements of young children's pain reports could lead to improved understanding, assessment, and treatment of pediatric pain.
Rights
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).