1
40
1
-
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
February 2022 List
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Citation List Month
February 2022 List
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/02692163211068997" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1177/02692163211068997</a>
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Communication strategies and persuasion as core components of shared decision-making for children with life-limiting conditions: A multiple case study
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Palliative Medicine
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2021
Subject
The topic of the resource
adolescent; Child; family; palliative care; decision-making; preschool; qualitative research; longitudinal studies
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Popejoy E; Almack K; Manning JC; Johnston B; Pollock K
Description
An account of the resource
BACKGROUND: Families and professionals caring for children with life-limiting conditions face difficult healthcare decisions. Shared decision-making is promoted in many countries, however little is known about factors influencing these processes. AIM: To explore the communication strategies used in shared decision-making for children with life-limiting conditions. DESIGN: A longitudinal, qualitative, multiple-case study. Cases were centred around the child and parent/carer(s). Most cases also included professionals or extended family members. Data from interviews, observations and medical notes were re-storied for each case into a narrative case summary. These were subject to comparative thematic analysis using NVivo11. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Eleven cases recruited from three tertiary hospitals in England. 23 participants were interviewed (46 interviews). Cases were followed for up to 12 months between December 2015 and January 2017. 72 observations were conducted and the medical notes of nine children reviewed. FINDINGS: Strategies present during shared decision-making were underpinned by moral work. Professionals presented options they believed were in the child's best interests, emphasising their preference. Options were often presented in advance of being necessary to prevent harm, therefore professionals permitted delay to treatment. Persuasion was utilised over time when professionals felt the treatment was becoming more urgent and when families felt it would not promote the child's psychosocial wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: Communication strategies in shared decision-making are underpinned by moral work. Professionals should be aware of the models of shared decision-making which include such communication strategies. Open discussions regarding individuals' moral reasoning may assist the process of shared decision-making.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/02692163211068997" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1177/02692163211068997</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2021
Adolescent
Almack K
Child
Decision-making
Family
February 2022 List
Johnston B
Longitudinal Studies
Manning JC
Palliative Care
Palliative Medicine
Pollock K
Popejoy E
Preschool
Qualitative Research