1
40
1
-
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
February 2019 List
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Citation List Month
February 2019 List
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14110" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> http://doi.o
rg/10.1111/dmcn.14110</a>
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Family-provider consensus outcomes for children with medical complexity
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2018
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Fayed N; Guttmann A; Chiu A; Gardecki M; Orkin J; Hamid JS; Major N; Lim A; Cohen E
Description
An account of the resource
Aim To describe the process of obtaining consensus of outcome priorities between families of children with medical complexity (CMC) and their healthcare providers (HCPs) for the purpose of evaluating changes to service delivery. Method The consensus of outcomes involved surveying families of CMC and HCPs and an in-person consensus meeting. Priorities were obtained from the survey using a stratified ranking approach ensuring equal representation among unequally sized subgroups. An in-person meeting was held using the survey results to inform Delphi voting. Results Families of CMC (n=40) and HCPs (n=74) responded to the survey. Consensus generated three main target areas (child health, family health, experience of care) covered by 15 specific outcomes needed to evaluate care. Differences between family and HCP perceptions of importance were found for child self-care, play, social skills, and recreation as well as emotional health (for both parent and child) outcomes. Interpretation Families of CMC and HCPs identified common priorities for outcome evaluation of CMC initiatives. Outcomes that differ in importance between families of CMC and HCPs should be studied further. What this paper adds Families of children with medical complexity and their providers can reach consensus on important outcomes. Stratifying subgroups ensures diverse representation, which is important to outcome prioritization.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14110" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1111/dmcn.14110</a>
2018
Chiu A
Cohen E
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Fayed N
February 2019 List
Gardecki M
Guttmann A
Hamid JS
Lim A
Major N
Orkin J