1
40
1
-
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
April 2021 List
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Citation List Month
April 2021 List
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319888988" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319888988</a>
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Finding a way with words: Delphi study to develop a discussion prompt list for paediatric palliative care
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Palliative Medicine
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2020
Subject
The topic of the resource
child; Humans; Pediatrics; Communication; Family/psychology; Professional-Family Relations; paediatrics; Palliative care; Advance Care Planning; Delphi technique; Stakeholder Participation; prompt list; Reminder Systems/instrumentation
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Ekberg S; Herbert A; Johns K; Tarrant G; Sansone H; Yates P; Danby S; Bradford NK
Description
An account of the resource
BACKGROUND: Effective communication is a cornerstone of quality paediatric palliative care. Families report struggling, however, to know what to discuss, with whom, and when. Although question prompt lists exist for adult palliative care, they do not suit the unique circumstances of paediatric palliative care. AIM: To develop a prompt list suitable for paediatric palliative care. DESIGN: Underpinned by Delphi methodology, a six-phase procedure was adopted: (1) drafting items based on the findings of a literature review, (2) condensing the list of items based on group discussion, (3) refining items based on a survey of expert healthcare professionals, (4) additional refining of items based on another survey of professionals, (5) further refining of items based on cognitive interviews with family members, and (6) final review by healthcare professional and family member groups. PARTICIPANTS: Three participant groups were involved during various phases: (1) members of an Australasian paediatric palliative care national reference group, (2) healthcare professionals associated with a local paediatric palliative care service, and (3) family members who were users of the same local service. RESULTS: Through multi-phase consultation across participant groups, the draft question prompt list was refined progressively to 28 items, split across two booklets to allow end-of-life items to be provided separately, and reconceptualised as a discussion prompt list rather than a question prompt list. CONCLUSION: By involving representatives of major stakeholder groups, this study has facilitated the design of a prompt list suited to the circumstances of paediatric palliative care. Future research should trial the effectiveness of this resource.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319888988" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1177/0269216319888988</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2020
Advance Care Planning
April 2021 List
Bradford NK
Child
Communication
Danby S
Delphi Technique
Ekberg S
Family/psychology
Herbert A
Humans
Johns K
Paediatrics
Palliative Care
Palliative Medicine
Pediatrics
Professional-family Relations
prompt list
Reminder Systems/instrumentation
Sansone H
Stakeholder Participation
Tarrant G
Yates P