Home values and experiences navigation track (HomeVENT): Supporting decisions about pediatric home ventilation
child; article; cohort analysis; female; human; male; quality of life; palliative therapy; Ventilators, Mechanical; tracheostomy; content analysis; pilot study; respiratory failure; adolescent; decision making; intensive care unit; semi structured interview; pediatric patient; length of stay; counseling; artificial ventilation; home ventilation; Question Prompt List
Objective: To pilot feasibility and acceptability of HomeVENT, a systematic approach to family-clinician decision-making about pediatric home ventilation. Methods: Parents and clinicians of children facing home ventilation decisions were enrolled at 3 centers using a pre/post cohort design. Family interventions included: 1) a website describing the experiences of families who previously chose for and against home ventilation 2) a Question Prompt List (QPL); 3) in-depth interviews exploring home life and values. Clinician HomeVENT intervention included a structured team meeting reviewing treatment options in light of the family's home life and values. All participants were interviewed one month after the decision. Results: We enrolled 30 families and 34 clinicians. Most Usual Care (14/15) but fewer Intervention (10/15) families elected for home ventilation. Families reported the website helped them consider different treatment options, the QPL promoted discussion within the family and with the team, and the interview helped them realize how home ventilation might change their daily life. Clinicians reported the team meeting helped clarify prognosis and prioritize treatment options. Conclusions: The HomeVENT pilot was feasible and acceptable. Innovation: This systematic approach to pediatric home ventilation decisions prioritizes family values and is a novel method to increase the rigor of shared decision-making in a rushed clinical environment.
Boss RD; Vo HH; Jabre NA; Shepard J; Mercer A; McDermott A; Lanier CL; Ding Y; Wilfond BS; Henderson CM
PEC Innovation
2023
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100173" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100173</a>
"What Would Give Her the Best Life?": Understanding Why Families Decline Pediatric Home Ventilation
pediatric decision making; pediatric palliative care; pediatric quality of life; Qualitative Research; tracheostomy; Ventilators; Mechanical
Background: Families who must decide about pediatric home ventilation rely on the clinicians who counsel them for guidance. Most studies about pediatric home ventilation decisions focus on families who opt for this intervention, leaving much unknown about the families who decline. Objective: To describe the rationales of families who decline home ventilation. Design: Semi-structured interview study. Setting/Subjects: We interviewed 16 families in hospitals across 3 U.S. states, identified by their clinicians as previously deciding to not pursue home ventilation via tracheostomy within the past five years. Measurements: Targeted content and narrative analyses were used to understand family intentions and reasons for declining. Results: The clinical and social context varied among the 16 families in this study. Families' intentions in saying "no" fell into two categories: (1) definitive "No": Families who stood firm on in their decision and (2) contingent "No": Families who may consider this in the future. Families described four reasons why their child did not receive home ventilation: (1) concern about medical impacts, (2) concern about physical and/or communication restrictions, (3) concern that there would be no clear health benefit, and (4) concern about no clear meaningful life. Most families mentioned all four reasons, but concern about no clear meaningful life predominated. Conclusions: Though these families did not see home ventilation as an appropriate option, each reported a complex interplay of intentions behind and reasons for declining. Clinicians who counsel families about home ventilation could share the reasons that families commonly decline this intervention to facilitate a balanced discussion.
Shipman KJ; Mercer AH; Raisanen JC; Jabre NA; Vo HH; Miles A; Shepard J; Henderson CM; Boss RD; Wilfond BS
Journal of Palliative Medicine
2023
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2022.0426" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1089/jpm.2022.0426</a>
Family Experiences Deciding For and Against Pediatric Home Ventilation
decision-making; children with medical complexity; parent perspective; home ventilation
Objective: To understand what considerations drive family decisions for, and against, pediatric home ventilation. Study design: Qualitative interviews with parents of children who faced a decision about home ventilation in the previous 5 years at 3 geographically dispersed institutions. Result(s): In total, 38 families (42 parents) were interviewed; 20 families opted for pediatric home ventilation, and 18 families opted against. Approximately one-quarter of children had isolated chronic lung disease; the remainder had medical complexity that was expected to remain static or decline. Parent perspectives about home ventilation generally reflected whether the child was early, or later, in their disease trajectory. Early on, parents often interpreted prognostic uncertainty as hope and saw home ventilation as a tool permitting time for improvement. For families of children later in their disease course, often already with home technology and home nursing, home ventilation held less possibility for meaningful improvement. Nearly all families experienced the decision as very emotionally distressing. Reflecting back, most families described feeling satisfied with whatever decision they made. Conclusion(s): The 2 principal groups of families in our cohort-those with children whose respiratory insufficiency might improve, and those with children facing chronic decline-warrant targeted counseling approaches about initiating home ventilation. The distressing nature of this decision should be anticipated and family supports reinforced. Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc.
Boss RD; Henderson CM; Raisanen JC; Jabre NA; Shipman K; Wilfond BS
Journal of Pediatrics
2021
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.10.014" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.10.014</a>
Home mechanical ventilation for children with severe neurological impairment: Parents' perspectives on clinician counselling
children; home mechanical ventilation; parent perspectives; severe neurological impairment
AIM: To retrospectively explore the perspectives of parents of children with severe neurological impairment (SNI), such as those with severe cerebral palsy, epilepsy syndromes, and structural brain differences, on clinician counseling regarding home mechanical ventilation (HMV). METHOD: Inductive thematic analysis was performed on data from telephone interviews with parents who chose for and against HMV for their child with SNI at three academic children's hospitals across the USA. RESULTS: Twenty-six parents/legal guardians of 24 children were interviewed. Fourteen children had static encephalopathy, 11 received HMV, and 20 were alive at the time of parent interviews. Themes included how HMV related to the child's prognosis, risk of death, and integration with goals of care. Although clinicians voiced uncertainty about how HMV would impact their child, parents felt this was coupled with prescriptive/intimidating examples about the child's end of life and judgments about the child's quality of life. INTERPRETATION: While prognositc uncertainty exists, this study suggests that parents of children with SNI seek clinician counseling about HMV that considers their goals of care and views on their child's quality of life.
Bogetz JF; Munjapara V; Henderson CM; Raisanen JC; Jabre NA; Shipman KJ; Wilfond BS; Boss RD
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
2022
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15151" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1111/dmcn.15151</a>