How doctors manage conflicts with families of critically ill patients during conversations about end-of-life decisions in neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care
child; human; female; male; article; adult; newborn; responsibility; conversation; family; morality; uncertainty; emotion; conflict; conflict; health; research; literacy; management; patient; clinical; genetic; qualitative; care; ill; intensive; unit; decision; making; clinical; critically; intensive; transcription
Purpose Intensive care is a stressful environment in which team-family conflicts commonly occur. If managed poorly, conflicts can have negative effects on all parties involved. Previous studies mainly investigated these conflicts and their management in a retrospective way. This study aimed to prospectively explore team-family conflicts, including its main topics, complicating factors, doctors’ conflict management strategies and the effect of these strategies. Methods Conversations between doctors in the neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care unit of a large university-based hospital and families of critically ill patients were audio-recorded from the moment doubts arose whether treatment was still in patients’ best interest. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using a qualitative deductive approach. Results Team-family conflicts occurred in 29 out of 101 conversations (29%) concerning 20 out of 36 patients (56%). Conflicts mostly concerned more than one topic. We identified four complicating context- and/or family-related factors: diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty, families’ strong negative emotions, limited health literacy, and burden of responsibility. Doctors used four overarching strategies to manage conflicts, namely content-oriented, process-oriented, moral and empathic strategies. Doctors mostly used content-oriented strategies, independent of the intensive care setting. They were able to effectively address conflicts in most conversations. Yet, if they did not acknowledge families’ cues indicating the existence of one or more complicating factors, conflicts were likely to linger on during the conversation. Conclusion This study underlines the importance of doctors tailoring their communication strategies to the concrete conflict topic(s) and to the context- and family-related factors which complicate a specific conflict.
Spijkers A S; Akkermans A; Smets EMA; Schultz MJ; Cherpanath TGV; van Woensel JBM; van Heerde M; van Kaam AH; van de Loo M; Willems DL; de Vos MA
Intensive Care Medicine
2022
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06771-5" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1007/s00134-022-06771-5</a>
One-year survival and neurological outcome after pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Child; Female; Humans; Male; Logistic Models; Resuscitation Orders; Survival Analysis; Predictive Value of Tests; Disability Evaluation; adolescent; Preschool; infant; retrospective studies; Outcomes; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; mortality
OBJECTIVE: Reported survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in children varies considerably. We aimed to identify predictors of 1-year survival and to assess long-term neurological status after in- or outpatient CPR. DESIGN: Retrospective review of the medical records and prospective follow-up of CPR survivors. SETTING: Tertiary care pediatric university hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 30-month period, 89 in- and outpatients received advanced CPR. Survivors of CPR were prospectively followed-up for 1 year. Neurological outcome was assessed by the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scale (PCPC). Variables predicting 1-year survival were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: Seventy-one of the 89 patients were successfully resuscitated. During subsequent hospitalization do-not-resuscitate orders were issued in 25 patients. At 1 year, 48 (54%) were alive, including two of the 25 patients with out-of-hospital CPR. All patients died, who required CPR after trauma or near drowning, when CPR began >10 min after arrest or with CPR duration >60 min. Prolonged CPR (21-60 min) was compatible with survival (five of 19). At 1 year, 77% of the survivors had the same PCPC score as prior to CPR. Predictors of survival were location of resuscitation, CPR during peri- or postoperative care, and duration of resuscitation. A clinical score (0-15 points) based on these three items yielded an area under the ROC of 0.93. CONCLUSIONS: Independent determinants of long-term survival of pediatric resuscitation are location of arrest, underlying cause, and duration of CPR. Long-term survivors have little or no change in neurological status.
2002
Horisberger T; Fischer E; Fanconi S
Intensive Care Medicine
2002
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-001-1188-z" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1007/s00134-001-1188-z</a>
Conflict in the care of patients with prolonged stay in the ICU: types, sources, and predictors
Female; Humans; Male; Adult; Prospective Studies; Aged; Middle Aged; Family Relations; Professional-Family Relations; Boston; Communication Barriers; Length of Stay; Dissent and Disputes; Interprofessional Relations; Time Factors; Reproducibility of Results; Case-Control Studies; 80 and over; decision making; ICU Decision Making; Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data; Intensive Care/statistics & numerical data
OBJECTIVE: To determine types, sources, and predictors of conflicts among patients with prolonged stay in the ICU. DESIGN AND SETTING: We prospectively identified conflicts by interviewing treating physicians and nurses at two stages during the patients' stays. We then classified conflicts by type and source and used a case-control design to identify predictors of team-family conflicts. DESIGN AND SETTING: Seven medical and surgical ICUs at four teaching hospitals in Boston, USA. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the participating ICUs over an 11-month period whose stay exceeded the 85th percentile length of stay for their respective unit ( n=656). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Clinicians identified 248 conflicts involving 209 patients; hence, nearly one-third of patients had conflict associated with their care: 142 conflicts (57%) were team-family disputes, 76 (31%) were intrateam disputes, and 30 (12%) occurred among family members. Disagreements over life-sustaining treatment led to 63 team-family conflicts (44%). Other leading sources were poor communication (44%), the unavailability of family decision makers (15%), and the surrogates' (perceived) inability to make decisions (16%). Nurses detected all types of conflict more frequently than physicians, especially intrateam conflicts. The presence of a spouse reduced the probability of team-family conflict generally (odds ratio 0.64) and team-family disputes over life-sustaining treatment specifically (odds ratio 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Conflict is common in the care of patients with prolonged stays in the ICU. However, efforts to improve the quality of care for critically ill patients that focus on team-family disagreements over life-sustaining treatment miss significant discord in a variety of other areas.
2003
Studdert DM; Mello MM; Burns JP; Puopolo AL; Galper BZ; Truog RD; Brennan T
Intensive Care Medicine
2003
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1853-5" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1007/s00134-003-1853-5</a>
Decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapy in ICU patients independently predict hospital death
Female; Humans; Male; Hospital Mortality; Prospective Studies; Aged; Middle Aged; Comorbidity; Resuscitation Orders; Severity of Illness Index; Survival Analysis; Risk Factors; Hospitals; Analysis of Variance; Predictive Value of Tests; Proportional Hazards Models; Teaching; 80 and over; Empirical Approach; Death and Euthanasia; decision making; ICU Decision Making; Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data; APACHE; Critical Care/statistics & numerical data; Life Support Care/statistics & numerical data; Paris/epidemiology; Withholding Treatment/statistics & numerical data
OBJECTIVE: More than one-half the deaths of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) occur after a decision to forgo life-sustaining therapy (DFLST). Although DFLSTs typically occur in patients with severe comorbidities and intractable acute medical disorders, other factors may influence the likelihood of DFLSTs. The objectives of this study were to describe the factors and mortality associated with DFLSTs and to evaluate the potential independent impact of DFLSTs on hospital mortality. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective multicenter 2-year study in six ICUs in France. PATIENTS: The 1,698 patients admitted to the participating ICUs during the study period, including 295 (17.4%) with DFLSTs. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The impact of DFLSTs on hospital mortality was evaluated using a model that incorporates changes in daily logistic organ dysfunction scores during the first ICU week. Univariate predictors of death included demographic factors (age, gender), comorbidities, reasons for ICU admission, severity scores at ICU admission, and DFLSTs. In a stepwise Cox model five variables independently predicted mortality: good chronic health status (hazard ratio, 0.479), SAPS II score higher than 39 (2.05), chronic liver disease (1.463), daily logistic organ dysfunction score (1.357 per point), and DFLSTs (1.887). CONCLUSIONS: DFLSTs remain independently associated with death after adjusting on comorbidities and severity at ICU admission and within the first ICU week. This highlights the need for further clarifying the many determinants of DFLSTs and for routinely collecting DFLSTs in studies with survival as the outcome variable of interest.
2003
Azoulay E; Pochard F; Garrouste-Orgeas M; Moreau D; Montesino L; Adrie C; deLassence A; Cohen Y; Timsit JF; Outcomerea Study Group
Intensive Care Medicine
2003
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1989-3" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1007/s00134-003-1989-3</a>
Forgoing life support: how the decision is made in European pediatric intensive care units
Decision Making; Intensive Care Units Pediatric; Life Support Care; Withholding Treatment/sn [statistics & Numerical Data]; Child Preschool; Europe; Female; France; Health Care Surveys; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Surveys And Questionnaires; Terminal Care/td [trends]
PURPOSE: To determine how decisions to forgo life support are made in European pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). METHODS: A multicenter, prospective study, the Eurydice II study, among 45 PICUs: 20 in France, 21 in Northern/Western (N/W) European countries, and 4 in Eastern/Central (E/C) Europe. Data were collected between November 2009 and April 2010 through a questionnaire. RESULTS: The decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment was made in 166 (40.6%) out of 409 deceased children (median 42.9%, France 38.2%, N/W European countries 60.0%, E/C European countries 0%; P < 0.001). In the E/C group, more patients died after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) failure than after forgoing life support (P < 0.001). In all PICUs, caregivers discussed the decision during a formal meeting, after which the medical staff made the final decision. The decision was often documented in the medical record (median 100%). The majority of the parents were informed of the final decision and were at the bedside during their child's death (median 100%). Decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment occurred in 40.6% of children, compared with 33% in Eurydice I. A high percentage of parents from France were now informed about the meeting and its conclusion as compared with Eurydice I (median 100%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study and comparison with the Eurydice I study (2002) show a trend towards standardization of end-of-life practices across N/W European countries and France in the past decade.
Devictor DJ; Latour JM
Intensive Care Medicine
2011
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2357-3" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1007/s00134-011-2357-3</a>
The use of drugs with a life-shortening effect in end-of-life care in neonates and infants
Analgesics Opioid; Euthanasia; Muscle Relaxants Central; Potassium Chloride; Practice Patterns Physicians'; Terminal Care; 0 (analgesics Opioid); 0 (muscle Relaxants Central); 660yq98i10 (potassium Chloride); Belgium; Decision Making; Drug Utilization; Humans; Infant; Infant Newborn; Intention; Pain/dt [drug Therapy]; Terminal Care/es [ethics]
OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to describe the use of drugs with a possible or certain life-shortening effect in end-of-life care in infants and to evaluate the possibly lethal effect. DESIGN: For 292/298 deaths of live born infants (<1 year), in a 1-year period (between 1 August 1999 and 31 July 2000) in Flanders, Belgium, the attending physician could be identified and was sent an anonymous questionnaire. The questionnaires relating to deaths directly preceded by the administration of drugs were reviewed by a multi-disciplinary panel. RESULTS: The response rate was 86.6% (253/292). In 57 cases (22.5%), drugs were administered directly before death. In 17/57 cases, the physician explicitly intended to hasten death. In 16/17 cases information about the drug(s) was available: opioids were administered in 14, a muscle relaxant in 5 and potassium chloride in 3 cases. In 13 cases where the lethal effect could be evaluated, the panel judged that the drugs were effective in hastening death in 10 cases. In most cases the estimated life-shortening was <24 h. In 40/57 cases the physician administered drugs to alleviate pain and/or symptoms, taking into account a possible life-shortening effect without explicitly intending it. Opioids were administered in all 30 cases where information about the drug(s) was supplied. In 13 cases the lethal effect could be evaluated, and in 6 cases the panel judged that the drugs had hastened death. CONCLUSIONS: When life-shortening was explicitly intended, (dosages of) drugs were likely to be lethal. Drugs administered also clearly hastened death in some cases where life-shortening was not explicitly intended.
Provoost V; Cools F; Bilsen J; Ramet J; Deconinck P; Vander Stichele R; Vande Velde A; Van Herreweghe I; Mortier F; Vandenplas Y; Deliens L
Intensive Care Medicine
2006
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2863-2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1007/s00134-005-2863-2</a>