Parental Involvement In Neonatal Critical Care Decision-making.
Sociology; Life; Interrogatives; Consultation; Social Sciences; Biomedical; Decision Making; Shared Decision; Recommendations; Medical Authority; Communication; Conversation; End Of Life Care; Public; Public Environmental & Occupational Health; End; Resistance; Training; Cooperation; Communication; Palliative Care; Decision Making; Intensive Care; Participation; Ethics; Medicine; Physicians; Parents; Conversational Analysis; Decisions; Infant; Palliative Treatment; Parenting; Infants (newborn); Decision Making; Parent And Child; Analysis
Conversation Analysis; Decision-making; End Of Life; Ethics; Neonatal; Parental Involvement
The article analyses the decision-making process between doctors and parents of babies in neonatal intensive care. In particular, it focuses on cases in which the decision concerns the redirection of care from full intensive care to palliative care at the end of life. Thirty one families were recruited from a neonatal intensive care unit in England and their formal interactions with the doctor recorded. The conversations were transcribed and analysed using conversation analysis. Analysis focused on sequences in which decisions about the redirection of care were initiated and progressed. Two distinct communicative approaches to decision-making were used by doctors: 'making recommendations' and 'providing options'. Different trajectories for parental involvement in decision-making were afforded by each design, as well as differences in terms of the alignments, or conflicts, between doctors and parents. 'Making recommendations' led to misalignment and reduced opportunities for questions and collaboration; 'providing options' led to an aligned approach with opportunities for questions and fuller participation in the decision-making process. The findings are discussed in the context of clinical uncertainty, moral responsibility and the implications for medical communication training and guidance.
Shaw C; Stokoe E; Gallagher K; Aladangady N; Marlow N
Sociology Of Health & Illness
2016
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12455
Screening Of Newborns For Disorders With High Benefit-risk Ratios Should Be Mandatory
Medical Examination; Health Risk Assessment; Parental Consent; Laws Regulations And Rules; Infants (newborn)
Newborn screening has evolved to include an increasingly complex spectrum of diseases, raising concerns that screening should be optional and require parental consent. Early detection of disorders like PKU and MCAD is essential to prevent serious disability and death in affected children. These are examples of high benefit-risk ratio disorders because of the irrefutable health benefits of early detection, coupled with the low risks of treatment. The dire consequences of not diagnosing an infant with a treatable disorder because of parental refusal to screen are wholly unacceptable. Thus, we believe that newborn screening for disorders with high benefit-risk ratios should continue to be mandatory.
Kelly N; Makarem DC; Wasserstein MP
Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics
2016
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
DOI: 10.1177/1073110516654133