1
40
1
-
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Citation List Month
November 2017 List
Notes
<p>1879-1360<br />Hutti, Marianne H<br />Myers, John<br />Hall, Lynne A<br />Polivka, Barbara J<br />White, Susan<br />Hill, Janice<br />Kloenne, Elizabeth<br />Hayden, Jaclyn<br />Grisanti, Meredith McGrew<br />Journal Article<br />England<br />J Psychosom Res. 2017 Oct;101:128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Aug 2.</p>
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Predicting grief intensity after recent perinatal loss
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2017
Subject
The topic of the resource
Miscarriage; Neonatal Death; Perinatal Grief Screening Instrument; Stillbirth
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Hutti MH; Myers J; Hall LA; Polivka BJ; White S; Hill J; Kloenne E; Hayden J; Grisanti MM
Description
An account of the resource
OBJECTIVE: The Perinatal Grief Intensity Scale (PGIS) was developed for clinical use to identify and predict intense grief and need for follow-up after perinatal loss. This study evaluates the validity of the PGIS via its ability to predict future intense grief based on a PGIS score obtained early after a loss. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted with 103 international, English-speaking women recruited at hospital discharge or via the internet who experienced a miscarriage, stillbirth, or neonatal death within the previous 8weeks. Survey data were collected at baseline using the PGIS and the Perinatal Grief Scale (PGS). Follow-up data on the PGS were obtained 3months later. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: Cronbach's alphas were >/=0.70 for both instruments. PGIS factor analysis yielded three factors as predicted, explaining 57.7% of the variance. The optimal cutoff identified for the PGIS was 3.535. No difference was found when the ability of the PGIS to identify intense grief was compared to the PGS (p=0.754). The PGIS was not inferior to the PGS (AUC=0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.88, p<0.001) in predicting intense grief at the follow-up. A PGIS score>/=3.53 at baseline was associated with increased grief intensity at Time 2 (PGS: OR=1.97, 95% CI 1.59-2.34, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PGIS is comparable to the PGS, has a lower response burden, and can reliably and validly predict women who may experience future intense grief associated with perinatal loss.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.07.016
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2017
Grisanti MM
Hall LA
Hayden J
Hill J
Hutti MH
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Kloenne E
Miscarriage
Myers J
Neonatal Death
November 2017 List
Perinatal Grief Screening Instrument
Polivka BJ
Stillbirth
White S