"there's Just No Way to Help, and They Did." Parents Name Compassionate Care as a New Domain of Quality in Pediatric Home-Based Hospice and Palliative Care
compassion; home-based palliative care; hospice care; pediatric hospice care
Background: To design high-quality home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) systems, it is imperative to understand the perspectives of parents whose children enroll in HBHPC programs. Objective(s): The goal of this project was to identify and define parent/caregiver-prioritized domains of family-centered care in HBHPC by performing semistructured interviews of parents/caregivers ("parents") across Ohio whose children have received HBHPC. We hypothesized that the 10 provider-prioritized domains and their definitions, as identified in our previous research, would be modified and augmented by parents for application in the pediatric HBHPC setting. Method(s): This was a qualitative study utilizing semistructured interviews of bereaved parents of children who were enrolled in a pediatric HBHPC program at the three sites from 2012 to 2016 and parents of children who were currently enrolled in these programs for at least a year. Result(s): Parent-prioritized thematic codes mapped to 9 of the 10 provider-prioritized domains of quality HBHPC; none mapped to the domain "Ethical and Legal Aspects of Care." Although most of the provider-prioritized domains are pertinent to parents, parents defined these domains differently, deepening our understanding and perspective of quality within each domain. An 11th domain, Compassionate Care, was created and defined based on emergent themes. Conclusion(s): Parent/caregiver-prioritized domains of quality in pediatric HBHPC map closely to provider-prioritized domains, but parents define these domains differently. Parents also prioritize Compassionate Care as a new domain of quality in pediatric HBHPC. Measuring the quality of care provided in HBHPC programs through this broader perspective should enable the selection of measures which are truly patient- and family-centered. © Copyright 2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020.
Thienprayoon R; Grossoehme D; Humphrey LM; Pestian T; Frimpong-Manso M; Malcolm H; Kitamura E; Jenkins R; Friebert S
Journal of Palliative Medicine
2020
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2019.0418" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1089/jpm.2019.0418</a>
Concerns of Parents with Children Receiving Home-Based Pediatric Palliative Care
hospice; palliative care; parents; pediatrics; quality of life; symptom management
CONTEXT: Caring for a child who will die from a life-limiting illness is one of the most difficult experiences a parent may face. Pediatric palliative care (PPC) has grown as a specialty service to address the unique needs of children and families with serious illness. However, gaps remain between the needs of families in PPC and the support received. OBJECTIVE(S): The objective of this study was to explore the concerns of parents who have a child in home-based PPC. METHOD(S): Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 mothers and 10 fathers from 25 families shortly after their child's referral to home-based PPC. Children (57% male, Mage = 10.5 years, SD = 3.95, range = 4-18 years) had a range of diagnoses. Data were analyzed using inductive content analysis. RESULT(S): Parents' concerns clustered into four main themes: (1) ensuring that their child's remaining days were spent living well physically, emotionally, and socially; (2) uncertainty regarding their child's diagnosis, prognosis, and treatments; (3) their child's death (e.g., the process of dying and when it will occur); and (4) the family, including the impact of the child's illness and death on siblings and wanting to cherish as much time together with family as possible. CONCLUSION(S): Parents of children receiving home-based PPC expressed concerns across a range of domains, both about their seriously ill child and the broader family. These results highlight salient worries among parents of children in PPC, and point to critical areas for intervention for seriously ill children and the broader family. Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Tutelman PR; Lipak KG; Adewumi A; Fults MZ; Humphrey LM; Gerhardt CA
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
2020
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.007" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.007</a>
Healthcare Satisfaction and Unmet Needs Among Bereaved Parents in the NICU
Neonatal intensive care; Newborn Infant; Bereavement; Delivery of Health Care; Infant; Needs Assessment; Palliative Care; Parents; Personal Satisfaction; Prospective Studies; Terminal Care
BACKGROUND: Learning directly from bereaved parents about their experiences in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) can improve services at end-of-life (EOL) care. Parents who perceive that their infant suffered may report less satisfaction with care and may be at greater risk for distress after the death. Despite calls to improve EOL care for children, limited research has examined the EOL experiences of families in the NICU. PURPOSE: We examined parent perceptions of their infant's EOL experience (eg, symptom burden and suffering) and satisfaction with care in the NICU. METHODS/SEARCH STRATEGY: Forty-two mothers and 27 fathers (representing 42 infants) participated in a mixed-methods study between 3 months and 5 years after their infant's death (mean = 39.45 months, SD = 17.19). Parents reported on healthcare satisfaction, unmet needs, and infant symptoms and suffering in the final week of life. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Parents reported high levels of healthcare satisfaction, with relative strengths in providers' technical skills and inclusion of the family. Greater perceived infant suffering was associated with lower healthcare satisfaction and fewer well-met needs at EOL. Parents' understanding of their infant's condition, emotional support, communication, symptom management, and bereavement care were identified as areas for improvement. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Parents value comprehensive, family-centered care in the NICU. Additionally, monitoring and alleviating infant symptoms contribute to greater parental satisfaction with care. Improving staff knowledge about EOL care and developing structured bereavement follow-up programs may enhance healthcare satisfaction and family outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Prospective studies are needed to better understand parental perceptions of EOL care and the influence on later parental adjustment.
Baughcum AE; Fortney CA; Winning AM; Dunnells ZDO; Humphrey LM; Gerhardt CA
Advances in Neonatal Care
2020
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000677" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1097/ANC.0000000000000677</a>
Guidance on forgoing life-sustaining medical treatment
Apparent Life Threatening Event/th [therapy]; Life-sustaining Medical Treatment; Medical Procedures; Practice Guideline; Article; Awareness; Caregiver; Child Abuse; Child Care; Clinical Decision Making; Comatose Patient; Consensus; Consultation; Critical Illness/th [therapy]; Death; Death By Neurologic Criteria; Developmental Disorder/th [therapy]; Disease Burden; Disease Course; Ethical Decision Making; Extremely Low Gestational Age; Family Decision Making; Family Stress; Foster Care; Gestational Age; Goal Attainment; Health Belief; High Risk Population; Human; Hydration; Imminent Death; Informed Consent; Intensive Care; Interpersonal Communication; Legal Aspect; Medical Ethics; Medical Expert; Medical Information; Medically Administered Nutrition And Hydration; Medical Specialist; Neglect; Neurologic Disease/di [diagnosis]; Nutrition; Oxygenation; Pain/th [therapy]; Palliative Therapy; Patient Care Planning; Pediatrician; Priority Journal; Prognosis; Quality Of Life; Resuscitation; Shared Decision Making; Social Support; Spiritual Care; Survival; Teamwork; Terminal Care; Tissue Perfusion; Uncertain Prognosis
Pediatric health care is practiced with the goal of promoting the best interests of the child. Treatment generally is rendered under a presumption in favor of sustaining life. However, in some circumstances, the balance of benefits and burdens to the child leads to an assessment that forgoing life-sustaining medical treatment (LSMT) is ethically supportable or advisable. Parents are given wide latitude in decision-making concerning end-of-life care for their children in most situations. Collaborative decision-making around LSMT is improved by thorough communication among all stakeholders, including medical staff, the family, and the patient, when possible, throughout the evolving course of the patient's illness. Clear communication of overall goals of care is advised to promote agreed-on plans, including resuscitation status. Perceived disagreement among the team of professionals may be stressful to families. At the same time, understanding the range of professional opinions behind treatment recommendations is critical to informing family decision-making. Input from specialists in palliative care, ethics, pastoral care, and other disciplines enhances support for families and medical staff when decisions to forgo LSMT are being considered. Understanding specific applicability of institutional, regional, state, and national regulations related to forgoing LSMT is important to practice ethically within existing legal frameworks. This guidance represents an update of the 1994 statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics on forgoing LSMT.
Weise KL; Okun AL; Carter BS; Christian CW; Katz AL; Laventhal N; MacAuley RC; Moon MR; Opel DJ; Statter MB; Davies D; Dell ML; Diekema DS; Klipstein S; Elster N; Rivera F; Feudtner C; Boss RD; Hauer JM; Humphrey LM; Klick J; Linebarger JS; Parker S; Lord B; Imaizumi S; Guinn-Jones M; Flaherty EG; Gavril AR; Idzerda SM; Laskey A; Legano LA; Leventhal JM; Fortson BL; MacMillan H; Stedt E; Hurley TP
Pediatrics
2017
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a class="aap-doi-text" href="https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-1905" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1542/peds.2017-1905</a>