1 40 1 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Citation List Month Backlog URL Address <a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-6-1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-6-1</a> Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Identification of pain indicators for infants at risk for neurological impairment: a Delphi consensus study Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Bmc Pediatrics Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2006 Subject The topic of the resource Delphi Technique; NET Grey Lit; Delphi Method Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Stevens B; McGrath P; Yamada J; Gibbins S; Beyene J; Breau L; Camfield C; Finley A; Franck L; Howlett A; Johnston C; McKeever P; O'Brien K; Ohlsson A Description An account of the resource Background: A number of infant pain measures have been developed over the past 15 years incorporating behavioural and physiologic indicators; however, no reliable or valid measure exists for infants who are at risk for neurological impairments (NI). The objective of this study was to establish consensus about which behavioural, physiologic and contextual indicators best characterize pain in infants at high, moderate and low levels of risk for NI. Methods: A 39- item, self-administered electronic survey that included infant physiologic, behavioural and contextual pain indicators was used in a two round Delphi consensus exercise. Fourteen pediatric pain experts were polled individually and anonymously on the importance and usefulness of the pain indicators for the 3 differing levels of risk for NI. Results: The strength of agreement between expert raters was moderate in Round 1 and fair in Round 2. In general, pain indicators with the highest concordance for all three groups were brow bulge, facial grimace, eye squeeze, and inconsolability. Increased heart rate from baseline in the moderate and severe groups demonstrated high concordance. In the severe risk group, fluctuations in heart rate and reduced oxygen saturation were also highly rated. Conclusions: These data constitute the first step in contributing to the development and validation of a pain measure for infants at risk for NI. In future research, we will integrate these findings with the opinions of (a) health care providers about the importance and usefulness of infant pain indicators and (b) the pain responses of infants at mild, moderate and high risk for NI. 2006 Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context <a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-6-1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1186/1471-2431-6-1</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s). Type The nature or genre of the resource Journal Article 2006 Backlog Beyene J Bmc Pediatrics Breau L Camfield C Delphi Method Delphi Technique Finley A Franck L Gibbins S Howlett A Johnston C Journal Article McGrath P McKeever P NET Grey Lit O'Brien K Ohlsson A Stevens B Yamada J