End-of-life Practices Among Tertiary Care Picus In The United States: A Multicenter Study
Adolescent;Cause Of Death;Child;Child Preschool;Female;Hospital Mortality;Humans;Infant;Intensive Care Units Pediatric;Length Of Stay;Male;Practice Patterns Physicians';Prospective Studies;Terminal Care/methods;Terminal Care/statistics & Numerical Data;Tertiary Healthcare;Tissue And Organ Procurement/statistics & Numerical Data;United States
OBJECTIVE: To describe variability in end-of-life practices among tertiary care PICUs in the United States. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data prospectively collected from a random sample of patients (n = 10,078) admitted to PICUs affiliated with the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network between December 4, 2011, and April 7, 2013. SETTING: Seven clinical centers affiliated with the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network. PATIENTS: Patients included in the primary study were less than 18 years old, admitted to a PICU, and not moribund on PICU admission. Patients included in the secondary analysis were those who died during their hospital stay. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-five (2.7%; range across sites, 1.3-5.0%) patients died during their hospital stay; of these, 252 (92%; 76-100%) died in a PICU. Discussions with families about limitation or withdrawal of support occurred during the initial PICU stay for 173 patients (63%; 47-76%; p = 0.27) who died. Of these, palliative care was consulted for 67 (39%; 12-46%); pain service for 11 (6%; 10 of which were at a single site); and ethics committee for six (3%, from three sites). Mode of death was withdrawal of support for 141 (51%; 42-59%), failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 53 (19%; 12-28%), limitation of support for 46 (17%; 7-24%), and brain death for 35 (13%; 8-20%); mode of death did not differ across sites (p = 0.58). Organ donation was requested from 101 families (37%; 17-88%; p < 0.001). Of these, 20 donated (20%; 0-64%). Sixty-two deaths (23%; 10-53%; p < 0.001) were medical examiner cases. Of nonmedical examiner cases (n = 213), autopsy was requested for 79 (37%; 17-75%; p < 0.001). Of autopsies requested, 53 (67%; 50-100%) were performed. CONCLUSIONS: Most deaths in Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network-affiliated PICUs occur after life support has been limited or withdrawn. Wide practice variation exists in requests for organ donation and autopsy.
Meert KL; Keele L; Morrison W; Berg RA; Dalton H; Newth CJL; Harrison R; Wessel DL; Shanley T; Carcillo J; Clark A; Holubkov R; Jenkins T L; Doctor A; Dean JM; Pollack M
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
2015
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
10.1097/PCC.0000000000000520
Feasibility and Perceived Benefits of a Framework for Physician-Parent Follow-Up Meetings After a Child's Death in the PICU
OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate the feasibility and perceived benefits of conducting physician-parent follow-up meetings after a child's death in the PICU according to a framework developed by the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network. DESIGN:: Prospective observational study. SETTING:: Seven Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network-affiliated children's hospitals. SUBJECTS:: Critical care attending physicians, bereaved parents, and meeting guests (i.e., parent support persons, other health professionals). INTERVENTIONS:: Physician-parent follow-up meetings using the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network framework. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:: Forty-six critical care physicians were trained to conduct follow-up meetings using the framework. All meetings were video recorded. Videos were evaluated for the presence or absence of physician behaviors consistent with the framework. Present behaviors were evaluated for performance quality using a 5-point scale (1 = low, 5 = high). Participants completed meeting evaluation surveys. Parents of 194 deceased children were mailed an invitation to a follow-up meeting. Of these, one or both parents from 39 families (20%) agreed to participate, 80 (41%) refused, and 75 (39%) could not be contacted. Of 39 who initially agreed, three meetings were canceled due to conflicting schedules. Thirty-six meetings were conducted including 54 bereaved parents, 17 parent support persons, 23 critical care physicians, and 47 other health professionals. Physician adherence to the framework was high; 79% of behaviors consistent with the framework were rated as present with a quality score of 4.3 ± 0.2. Of 50 evaluation surveys completed by parents, 46 (92%) agreed or strongly agreed the meeting was helpful to them and 40 (89%) to others they brought with them. Of 36 evaluation surveys completed by critical care physicians (i.e., one per meeting), 33 (92%) agreed or strongly agreed the meeting was beneficial to parents and 31 (89%) to them. CONCLUSIONS:: Follow-up meetings using the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network framework are feasible and viewed as beneficial by meeting participants. Future research should evaluate the effects of follow-up meetings on bereaved parents' health outcomes.
2013-10
Meert KL; Eggly S; Berg RA; Wessel DL; Newth CJL; Shanley TP; Harrison R; Dalton H; Clark AE; Dean JM; Doctor Allan; Nicholson CE; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health; Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network
Critical Care Medicine
2013
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a26ff3" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a26ff3</a>
Limiting And Withdrawing Life Support In The Picu: For Whom Are These Options Discussed?
Child; Child Preschool; Critical Care/methods; Female; Humans; Infant; Intensive Care Units Pediatric; Length Of Stay; Life Support Care/utilization; Logistic Models; Male; Prospective Studies; Resuscitation Orders; Severity Of Illness Index; Terminal Care/methods
Most deaths in U.S. PICUs occur after a decision has been made to limitation or withdrawal of life support. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of children whose families discussed limitation or withdrawal of life support with clinicians during their child's PICU stay and to determine the factors associated with limitation or withdrawal of life support discussions.
DESIGN:
Secondary analysis of data prospectively collected from a random sample of children admitted to PICUs affiliated with the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network between December 4, 2011, and April 7, 2013.
SETTING:
Seven clinical sites affiliated with the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network.
PATIENTS:
Ten thousand seventy-eight children less than 18 years old, admitted to a PICU, and not moribund at admission.
INTERVENTIONS:
None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:
Families of 248 children (2.5%) discussed limitation or withdrawal of life support with clinicians. By using a multivariate logistic model, we found that PICU admission age less than 14 days, reduced functional status prior to hospital admission, primary diagnosis of cancer, recent catastrophic event, emergent PICU admission, greater physiologic instability, and government insurance were independently associated with higher likelihood of discussing limitation or withdrawal of life support. Black race, primary diagnosis of neurologic illness, and postoperative status were independently associated with lower likelihood of discussing limitation or withdrawal of life support. Clinical site was also independently associated with likelihood of limitation or withdrawal of life support discussions. One hundred seventy-three children (69.8%) whose families discussed limitation or withdrawal of life support died during their hospitalization; of these, 166 (96.0%) died in the PICU and 149 (86.1%) after limitation or withdrawal of life support was performed. Of those who survived, 40 children (53.4%) were discharged with severe or very severe functional abnormalities, and 15 (20%) with coma/vegetative state.
CONCLUSIONS:
Clinical factors reflecting type and severity of illness, sociodemographics, and institutional practices may influence whether limitation or withdrawal of life support is discussed with families of PICU patients. Most children whose families discuss limitation or withdrawal of life support die during their PICU stay; survivors often have substantial disabilities.
Keele L; Meert KL; Berg RA; Dalton H; Newth CJ; Harrison R; Wessel DL; Shanley T; Carcillo J; Morrison W; Funai T; Holubkov R; Dean JM; Pollack M
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
2016
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000614
Limiting And Withdrawing Life Support In The Picu: For Whom Are These Options Discussed?
Critical Care/mt [methods]; Intensive Care Units Pediatric; Life Support Care/ut [utilization]; Resuscitation Orders; Terminal Care/mt [methods]; Child; Child Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Length Of Stay; Logistic Models; Male; Prospective Studies; Severity Of Illness Index
OBJECTIVES: Most deaths in U.S. PICUs occur after a decision has been made to limitation or withdrawal of life support. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of children whose families discussed limitation or withdrawal of life support with clinicians during their child's PICU stay and to determine the factors associated with limitation or withdrawal of life support discussions. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data prospectively collected from a random sample of children admitted to PICUs affiliated with the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network between December 4, 2011, and April 7, 2013. SETTING: Seven clinical sites affiliated with the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network. PATIENTS: Ten thousand seventy-eight children less than 18 years old, admitted to a PICU, and not moribund at admission. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Families of 248 children (2.5%) discussed limitation or withdrawal of life support with clinicians. By using a multivariate logistic model, we found that PICU admission age less than 14 days, reduced functional status prior to hospital admission, primary diagnosis of cancer, recent catastrophic event, emergent PICU admission, greater physiologic instability, and government insurance were independently associated with higher likelihood of discussing limitation or withdrawal of life support. Black race, primary diagnosis of neurologic illness, and postoperative status were independently associated with lower likelihood of discussing limitation or withdrawal of life support. Clinical site was also independently associated with likelihood of limitation or withdrawal of life support discussions. One hundred seventy-three children (69.8%) whose families discussed limitation or withdrawal of life support died during their hospitalization; of these, 166 (96.0%) died in the PICU and 149 (86.1%) after limitation or withdrawal of life support was performed. Of those who survived, 40 children (53.4%) were discharged with severe or very severe functional abnormalities, and 15 (20%) with coma/vegetative state. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical factors reflecting type and severity of illness, sociodemographics, and institutional practices may influence whether limitation or withdrawal of life support is discussed with families of PICU patients. Most children whose families discuss limitation or withdrawal of life support die during their PICU stay; survivors often have substantial disabilities.
Keele L; Meert KL; Berg RA; Dalton H; Newth CJ; Harrison R; Wessel DL; Shanley T; Carcillo J; Morrison W; Funai T; Holubkov R; Dean JM; Pollack M; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
2016
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
10.1097/PCC.0000000000000614
Physicians' experiences and perspectives regarding follow-up meetings with parents after a child's death in the pediatric intensive care unit.
Communication; Critical Care; bereavement; ICU Decision Making; qualitative methods; parent
Objective: To investigate critical care physicians' experiences and perspectives regarding follow-up meetings with parents after a child's death in the pediatric intensive care unit. Parents of children who die in the pediatric intensive care unit often desire a follow-up meeting with the physicians who cared for their child.Design: Semistructured, audio-recorded telephone interviews.Setting: Six clinical centers affiliated with the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network.Participants: Seventy critical care physicians (i.e., attendings and fellows) practicing or training at a Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network clinical center between February 1, 2008 and June 30, 2008.Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-three (33%) physicians reported never participating in a follow-up meeting with bereaved parents; 22 (31%) participated in one to five meetings; and 25 (36%) participated in more than five meetings. Of those with prior experience, 44 (94%) met with parents at the hospital and 40 (85%) met within 3 months of the death. Meeting content included discussing autopsy, parent questions, hospital course, cause of death, genetic risk, bereavement services, and legal or administrative issues; providing emotional support; and receiving parent feedback. Forty (85%) physicians perceived the meetings to be beneficial to families, and 35 (74%) to physicians. Barriers included time and scheduling, family and physician unwillingness, distance and transportation, language and cultural issues, parent anger, and lack of a system for meeting initiation and planning.Conclusions: Critical care physicians have a wide range of experience conducting follow-up meetings with bereaved parents. Although physicians perceive benefits to follow-up meetings, barriers exist that interfere with their implementation in clinical practice.
2010-06
Meert K; Eggly S; Berger J; Zimmerman J; Anand KJS; Newth CJ; Harrison R; Carcillo J; Dean JM; Willson DF; Nicholson CE; The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health; Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
2010
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181e89c3a" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181e89c3a</a>