Developmental surveillance of infants and young children in pediatric primary care
Child; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Preschool; infant; Developmental Disabilities/diagnosis; Child Health Services/standards; Internet/utilization
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews the importance of appropriate developmental surveillance in early childhood, what is known about its effectiveness in current pediatric practice, and ways in which its delivery can be improved to optimize child outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Many infants and young children with developmental delays or risk factors for poor developmental outcomes are not identified by pediatric practitioners in a timely manner. When they are identified, they are often not referred to appropriate early intervention services or early childhood development programs. They are therefore denied the opportunity to benefit from programs documented to have long-lasting benefits for children. Structuring developmental screening around the use of validated parent questionnaires improves the rates at which children with developmental needs are appropriately identified. At the same time, lowering thresholds for referral improves the rates at which children with identified needs receive appropriate services. SUMMARY: Pediatric practitioners are uniquely positioned to improve children's developmental outcomes through early identification and referral of children with developmental delays or risk factors for poor developmental outcomes. Unfortunately, inappropriate screening practices, high thresholds for referral, misplaced concerns about causing parental anxiety, and unfamiliarity with local resources all diminish the effectiveness with which many practitioners conduct developmental surveillance. Recent studies show that small changes in screening and referral practices have the potential to greatly improve the effectiveness of developmental surveillance. This, in turn, has the potential to improve lifelong outcomes for children.
2003
King TM; Glascoe FP
Current Opinion In Pediatrics
2003
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1097/00008480-200312000-00014" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1097/00008480-200312000-00014</a>
Parents' evaluation of developmental status: how well do parents' concerns identify children with behavioral and emotional problems?
Child; Female; Humans; Male; Parents; Age Factors; Socioeconomic Factors; Risk Factors; Reproducibility of Results; Predictive Value of Tests; Preschool; infant; Child Behavior Disorders/diagnosis/etiology; Affective Symptoms/diagnosis/etiology; Developmental Disabilities/diagnosis/etiology
This study was undertaken to determine which parental concerns are most associated with significant behavioral/emotional problems and the extent to which parents' concerns can be depended on in the detection of mental health problems. An additional goal is to view how well a recently published screening test relying on parents' concerns, Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS), detects behavioral and emotional problems. Subjects were a national sample of 472 parents and their children (21 months to 8 years old) who were participants in 1 of 2 test standardization and validation studies. Sites included various pediatric settings, public schools, and Head Start programs in 5 diverse geographic locations. Subjects were representative of U.S. demographics in terms of ethnicity, parental level of education, gender, and socioeconomic status. At each site, psychological examiners, educational diagnosticians, or school psychologists recruited families, and obtained informed consent. Examiners disseminated a demographics questionnaire (in English or Spanish) and a developmental screening test that relies on parents' concerns (PEDS). Examiners were blinded to PEDS' scoring and interpretation administered either by interview or in writing, the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) or the Possible Problems Checklist (PPC), a subtest of the Child Development Inventory that includes items measuring emotional well-being and behavioral self-control. PEDS was used to sort children into risk for developmental disabilities according to various types of parental concern. Those identified as having high or moderate risk were nominated for diagnostic testing or screening followed by developmental and mental health services when indicated. Because their emotional and behavioral needs would have been identified and addressed, these groups were removed from the analysis (N = 177). Of the 295 children who would not have been nominated for further scrutiny on PEDS due to their low risk of developmental problems, 102 had parents with concerns not predictive of developmental disabilities (e.g., behavior, social skills, self-help skills) and 193 had no concerns at all. Of the 295 children, 12% had scores on either the ECBI or the PPC indicative of mental health problems. Two parental concerns were identified through logistic regression as predictive of mental health status: behavior (OR = 4.74, CI = 1.69-13.30); and social skills (OR = 5.76, CI = 2.46-13.50). If one or more of these concerns was present, children had 8.5 times the risk of mental health problems (CI = 3.69-19.71) In children 434 years of age and older, one or both concerns was 87% sensitive and 79% specific to mental health status, figures keeping with standards for screening test accuracy. In young children, the presence of one or both concerns was 68% sensitive and 66% specific to mental health status. The findings suggest that certain parental concerns, if carefully elicited, can be depended on to detect mental health problems when children are 41 years and older and at low risk of developmental problems. For younger children, clinicians should counsel parents in disciplinary techniques, follow up, and if suggestions were not effective, administer a behavioral-emotional screening test such as the Pediatric Symptoms Checklist or the ECBI before making a referral decision.
2003
Glascoe FP
Clinical Pediatrics
2003
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/000992280304200206" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1177/000992280304200206</a>