1 40 1 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource March 2024 List Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Citation List Month March List 2024 URL Address <a href="http://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001557" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> http://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001557</a> Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Discussing Death as a Possible Outcome of PICU Care Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2018 Subject The topic of the resource attitude to death; death; child; critical illness; decision making; doctor patient relationship; family; female; human; interpersonal communication; male; pediatric intensive care unit; physician; psychology; risk assessment; terminal care; uncertainty Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Gilleland JC; Parshuram CS Description An account of the resource OBJECTIVES: To describe practical considerations related to discussions about death or possible death of a critically ill child. DATA SOURCES: Personal experience and reflection. Published English language literature. STUDY SELECTION: Selected illustrative studies. DATA EXTRACTION: Not available. DATA SYNTHESIS: Narrative and experiential review were used to describe the following areas benefits and potential adverse consequences of conversations about risk of death and the timing of, preparation for, and conduct of conversations about risk of death. <br/>CONCLUSION(S): Timely conversations about death as a possible outcome of PICU care are an important part of high-quality ICU care. Not all patients "require" these conversations; however, identifying patients for whom conversations are indicated should be an active process. Informed conversations require preparation to provide the best available objective information. Information should include distillation of local experience, incorporate the patients' clinical trajectory, the potential impact(s) of alternate treatments, describe possible modes of death, and acknowledge the extent of uncertainty. We suggest the more factual understanding of risk of death should be initially separated from the more inherent value-laden treatment recommendations and decisions. Gathering and sharing of collective knowledge, conduct of additional investigations, and time can increase the factual content of risk of death discussions. Timely and sensitive delivery of this best available knowledge then provides foundation for high-quality treatment recommendations and decision-making. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context <a href="http://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001557" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1097/PCC.0000000000001557</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s). 2018 Attitude To Death Child Critical Illness Death Decision Making doctor patient relationship Family Female Gilleland JC Human Interpersonal Communication Male March List 2024 Parshuram CS Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Physician Psychology Risk Assessment Terminal Care Uncertainty