Consensus statements: the Family Management Style Framework and its use with families of children with cancer
Adaptation; PedPal Lit; Psychological ChildDisease Management HumansModels; Psychological Neoplasms/nursing/psychology Nuclear Family/psychology Nursing Assessment/methods
2006
Nelson AE; Deatrick JA; Knafl KA; Alderfer MA; Ogle SK
Journal Of Pediatric Oncology Nursing
2006
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/1043454205283577" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1177/1043454205283577</a>
Developing a family-reported measure of experiences with home-based pediatric palliative and hospice care: a multi-method, multi-stakeholder approach
Pediatric palliative care; Pediatric hospice care; Home-based care; Experience with care; Instrument development
Background: Many children with serious illnesses are receiving palliative and end-of-life care from pediatric palliative and hospice care teams at home (PPHC@Home). Despite the growth in PPHC@Home, no standardized measures exist to evaluate whether PPHC@Home provided in the U.S. meets the needs and priorities of children and their families. Method(s): We developed and conducted a preliminary evaluation of a family-reported measure of PPHC@Home experiences using a multi-method, multi-stakeholder approach. Our instrument development process consisted of four phases. Item identification and development (Phase 1) involved a comprehensive literature search of existing instruments, guidelines, standards of practice, and PPHC@Home outcome studies, as well as guidance from a PPHC stakeholder panel. Phase 2 involved the initial item prioiritization and reduction using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with PPHC professionals and parent advocates. Phase 3 involved a second DCE with bereaved parents and parents currently receiving care for their child to further prioritize and winnow the items to a set of the most highly-valued items. Finally, we conducted cognitive interviews with parents to provide information about the content validity and clarity of the newly-developed instrument (Phase 4). Result(s): Items were compiled predominantly from three existing instruments. Phase 2 participants included 34 PPHC providers, researchers, and parent advocates; Phase 3 participants included 47 parents; and Phase 4 participants included 11 parents. At the completion of Phase 4, the Experiences of Palliative and Hospice Care for Children and Caregivers at Home (EXPERIENCE@Home) Measure contains 22 of the most highly-valued items for evaluating PPHC@Home. These items include "The care team treats my child's physical symptoms so that my child has as good a quality of life as possible", "I have regular access to on-call services from our care team", and "The nurses have the knowledge, skills, and experience to support my child's palliative or hospice care at home." Conclusion(s): The EXPERIENCE@Home Measure is the first known to specifically measure family-reported experiences with PPHC@Home in the U.S. Future work will include formal psychometric evaluation with a larger sample of parents, as well as evaluation of the clinical utility of the instrument with PPHC@Home teams. Copyright © 2021, The Author(s).
Boyden JY; Feudtner C; Deatrick JA; Widger K; LaRagione G; Lord B; Ersek M
BMC Palliative Care
2021
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00703-0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/s12904-020-00703-0</a>
Factors Associated With Use Of U.S. Community-based Palliative Care For Children With Life-limiting Or Life-threatening Illnesses And Their Families: An Integrative Review
Children And Families; Community; Home; Integrative Review; Life-limiting/life Threatening Illness; Palliative Care
CONTEXT: As children with life-limiting and life-threatening illnesses live longer, challenges to meeting their complex health care needs arise in homes and communities, as well as in hospitals. Integrated knowledge regarding community-based pediatric palliative care (CBPPC) is needed to strategically plan for a seamless continuum of care for children and their families. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this integrative review paper is to explore factors that are associated with the use of CBPPC for U.S. children with life-limiting and life-threatening illnesses and their families. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Google Scholar, as well as an ancestry search, to identify empirical studies and program evaluations published between 2000 and 2016. The methodological protocol included an evaluation of empirical quality and explicit data collection of synthesis procedures. RESULTS: Forty peer-reviewed quantitative and qualitative methodological interdisciplinary papers were included in the final sample. Patient characteristics such as older age and a solid tumor cancer diagnosis, and interpersonal factors such as family support were associated with higher CBPPC use. Organizational features were the most frequently discussed factors that increased CBPPC, including the importance of inter-professional hospice services and inter-organizational care coordination for supporting the child and family at home. Lastly, geography, concurrent care and hospice eligibility regulations, and funding and reimbursement mechanisms were associated with CBPPC use on a community and systemic level. CONCLUSION: Multilevel factors are associated with increased CBPPC use for children with life-limiting or life-threatening illnesses and their families in the U.S.
Boyden J Y; Curley M A Q; Deatrick JA; Ersek M
Journal Of Pain & Symptom Management
2017
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.017
Family management style and the challenge of moving from conceptualization to measurement
PedPal Lit; Adaptation; Psychological Child Chronic Disease/nursing/psychology Disease Management Family Nursing Humans Nuclear Family/psychology Nursing Assessment/methodsParenting Psychometrics Questionnaires United States
This article describes the process of translating the Family Management Style (FMS) Framework into a measure of FMS Survey. The conceptual underpinnings of the FMS Survey are briefly described as are the steps for translating the FMS major components and dimensions into a questionnaire to assess the family response to a childhood chronic illness. Content validity testing has been completed on the FMS Survey. Future plans include full-scale field testing of remaining psychometric properties.
2006
Knafl KA; Deatrick JA
Journal Of Pediatric Oncology Nursing
2006
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/1043454205283585" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1177/1043454205283585</a>
Family Management Style Framework: a new tool with potential to assess families who have children with brain tumors
PedPal Lit; Adaptation; Psychological Brain Neoplasms/nursing/psychology Child Disease Management Family Nursing Humans Models; Psychological Nuclear Family/psychologyNursing AssessmentParenting
Qualitative studies of families with children who have cancer or other serious illnesses have found that families often come to view their child and their lives as normal. They manage illness-related demands using family management styles that sustain usual patterns of family and child functioning. Few studies have addressed the family management styles of families who express less satisfaction with family and child functioning or who are identified by health care professionals as having difficulty with family functioning. Such families are likely to be overrepresented among those whose children are being treated for brain tumors that entail extremely burdensome treatments as well as a range of unfavorable prognoses and long-term sequelae. In fact, little is known about how these families manage on a day-to-day basis and how the interdisciplinary team can best provide supportive care to optimize their functioning. The purpose of this article is to present the Family Management Styles Framework as a tool that is useful in both clinical practice and research for assessing families who have children with cancer, including those with brain tumors.
2006
Deatrick JA; Thibodeaux AG; Mooney K; Schmus C; Pollack R; Davey BH
Journal Of Pediatric Oncology Nursing
2006
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/1043454205283574" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1177/1043454205283574</a>
Parenting in Childhood Life-Threatening Illness: A Mixed-Methods Study
child parent relation; palliative therapy; Child; Decision Making; Only Child; decision making; human experiment; sibling; child; human; female; male; article; controlled study; perception; childhood; interview; problem solving; social work
Background: Parenting children with life-threatening illness (LTI) and their healthy siblings requires parents to consider their various needs. Objective and Methods: We conducted a concurrent, cross-sectional mixed-methods study to describe challenges parents face prioritizing tasks and goals for each child with qualitative data, compare parents' tasks and goals for children with LTI and healthy siblings with quantitative data, and describe parenting in terms of the process of prioritizing tasks and goals for all children in the family. Results: Participants included 31 parents of children with LTI who have healthy siblings and were admitted to a children's hospital. Qualitative interviews revealed how parents managed children's needs and their perceptions of the toll it takes. Quantitative data revealed that parents prioritized "making sure my child feels loved" highest for ill and healthy children. Other goals for healthy siblings focused on maintaining emotional connection and regularity within the family and for ill children focused on illness management. Mixed-methods analysis revealed that parents engaged in a process decision making and traded-off competing demands by considering needs which ultimately transformed the meaning of parenting. Discussion: Future research can further examine trade-offs and associated effects, how to support parent problem-solving and decision-making around trade-offs, and how to best offer social services alongside illness-directed care.
Mooney-Doyle K; Deatrick JA; Ulrich CM; Meghani SH; Feudtner C
Journal of Palliative Medicine
2018
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2017.0054" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1089/jpm.2017.0054</a>
Parenting In The Face Of Childhood Life-threatening Conditions: The Ordinary In The Context Of The Extraordinary
Distress; Framework; Child; Perspectives; Cancer; Health Policy & Services; Serious Illness; Outcomes; Families; Bereaved Siblings
Life-threatening Condition; Palliative Care; Parenting; Pediatrics; Qualitative Description
OBJECTIVE:
Uncovering what it means to be a parent during the extraordinary time of a child's life-threatening condition (LTC) is important for understanding family goals, decision making, and the work of parenting within this context.
METHOD:
Qualitative descriptive methods were employed to describe the everyday experience of parenting both children who have an LTC and their healthy siblings.
RESULTS:
Some 31 parents of 28 children with an LTC who have healthy siblings participated in our study. Four themes emerged from the data that describe a parental desire to maintain emotional connection with all of their children, how parents use cues from their children to know them better and develop parenting strategies, how parents change as a result of caring for a child with an LTC, and how they strive to decrease suffering for all of their children.
SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS:
The findings of our study have implications for clinical practice, family-focused research, and health policy pertaining to families of children with life-threatening conditions.
Mooney-Doyle K; Deatrick JA
Palliative & Supportive Care
2016
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
DOI: 10.1017/S1478951515000905
What do parents value regarding pediatric palliative and hospice care in the home setting?
discrete choice experiment; home-based care; pediatric hospice care; pediatric palliative care
CONTEXT: Children with life-shortening serious illnesses and medically complex care needs are often cared for by their families at home. Little, however, is known about what aspects of pediatric palliative and hospice care in the home setting (PPHC@Home) families value the most. OBJECTIVE: To explore how parents rate and prioritize domains of PPHC@Home as the first phase of a larger study that developed a parent-reported measure of experiences with PPHC@Home. METHODS: Twenty domains of high-value PPHC@Home, derived from the National Consensus Project's Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, the literature, and a stakeholder panel, were evaluated. Using a discrete choice experiment, parents provided their ratings of the most and least valued PPHC@Home domains. We also explored potential differences in how subgroups of parents rated the domains. RESULTS: Forty-seven parents participated. Overall, highest-rated domains included Physical Aspects of Care: Symptom Management, Psychological/EmotionalSupportfor the Child, and Care Coordination. Lowest-rated domains included Spiritual and Religious Aspects of Care and Cultural Aspects of Care. In exploratory analyses, parents who had other children rated the Psychological/Emotional Aspects of Care for the Sibling(s) domain significantly higher than parents who did not have other children (P=0.02). Furthermore, bereaved parents rated the CaregiverSupportat the End of Life domain significantly higher than parents who were currently caring for their child (P=0.04). No other significant differences in domain ratings were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Knowing what parents value most about PPHC@Home provides the foundation for further exploration and conversation about priority areas for resource allocation and care improvement efforts.
Boyden JY; Ersek M; Deatrick JA; Widger K; LaRagione G; Lord BT; Feudtner C
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
2020
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.024" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.024</a>