1
40
2
-
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
April 2019 List
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Citation List Month
April 2019 List
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.04.004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.o rg/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.04.004</a>
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Assessing Ethics Knowledge: Development of a Test of Ethics Knowledge in Neonatology
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Journal of Pediatrics
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2018
Subject
The topic of the resource
Decision Making; Male; Surveys and Questionnaires; Humans; Adult; Female; medical education; Internship and Residency; medical ethics; assessment; milestones; professionalism; Ethics Medical/education; Neonatology/education; Psychometrics/education
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Cummings CL; Geis GM; Feldman HA; Berson ER; Kesselheim J C
Description
An account of the resource
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate the Test of Ethics Knowledge in Neonatology (TEK-Neo) with good internal consistency reliability, item performance, and construct validity that reliably assesses interprofessional staff and trainee knowledge of neonatal ethics. STUDY DESIGN: We adapted a published test of ethics knowledge for use in neonatology. The novel instrument had 46 true/false questions distributed among 7 domains of neonatal ethics: ethical principles, professionalism, genetic testing, beginning of life/viability, end of life, informed permission/decision making, and research ethics. Content and correct answers were derived from published statements and guidelines. We administered the voluntary, anonymous test via e-mailed link to 103 participants, including medical students, neonatology fellows, neonatologists, neonatology nurses, and pediatric ethicists. After item reduction, we examined psychometric properties of the resulting 36-item test and assessed overall sample performance. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 27% (103 of 380). The test demonstrated good internal reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.66), with a mean score of 28.5 +/- 3.4 out of the maximum 36. Participants with formal ethics training performed better than those without (30.3 +/- 2.9 vs 28.1 +/- 3.5; P = .01). Performance improved significantly with higher levels of medical/ethical training among the 5 groups: medical students, 25.9 +/- 3.7; neonatal nurses/practitioners, 27.7 +/- 2.7; neonatologists, 28.8 +/- 3.7; neonatology fellows, 29.8 +/- 2.9; and clinical ethicists, 33.0 +/- 1.9 (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The TEK-Neo reliably assesses knowledge of neonatal ethics among interprofessional staff and trainees in neonatology. This novel tool discriminates between learners with different levels of expertise and can be used interprofessionally to assess individual and group performance, track milestone progression, and address curricular gaps in neonatal ethics.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.04.004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.04.004</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2018
Adult
April 2019 List
Assessment
Berson ER
Cummings CL
Decision Making
Ethics Medical/education
Feldman HA
Female
Geis GM
Humans
Internship And Residency
Journal of Pediatrics
Kesselheim J C
Male
Medical Education
Medical Ethics
milestones
Neonatology/education
professionalism
Psychometrics/education
Surveys And Questionnaires
-
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
August 2022 List
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Citation List Month
August 2022 List
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151525" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151525</a>
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Moral equivalence theory in neonatology
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Seminars in Perinatology
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2022
Subject
The topic of the resource
Humans; Decision Making; Infant, Newborn; Withholding Treatment; Morals; Neonatology
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Lin M; Vitcov GG; Cummings CL
Description
An account of the resource
This article explores the ethical concept of "the equivalence thesis" (ET), or the idea that withdrawing and withholding life sustaining treatments are morally equivalent practices, within neonatology. We review the historical origins, theory, and clinical rationale behind ET, and provide an analysis of how ET relates to literature that describes neonatal mode of death and healthcare professional and parent attitudes towards end-of-life care. While ET may serve as an ethical tool to optimize resource allocation in theory, its clinical utility is limited given the complexity of end-of-life care decisions.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151525" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151525</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2022
August 2022 List
Cummings CL
Decision Making
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Lin M
Morals
Neonatology
Seminars in Perinatology
Vitcov GG
Withholding Treatment