Adverse Events During Intrahospital Transport of Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review
Infant; Adolescent; Child; Humans; Child Preschool; Pediatrics; Infant Newborn; Critical Illness/therapy; Critical Care/methods; Transportation of Patients
Intrahospital transport of a critically ill patient is often required to achieve a diagnostic and/or therapeutic objective. However, clinicians who recommend a procedure that requires transport are often not fully aware of the risks of transport. Clinicians involved in the care of critically ill children may therefore benefit from a clear enumeration of adverse events that have occurred during transport, risk factors for those events, and guidance for event prevention. The objective of this review was to collect all published harm and adverse events that occurred in critically ill children in the context of transport within a medical center, as well as the incidence of each type of event. A secondary objective was to identify what interventions have been previously studied that reduce events and to collect recommendations for harm prevention from study authors. Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and CINAHL were searched in January 2018 and again in December 2018. Terms indicating pediatric patients, intrahospital transport, critical illness, and adverse events were used. Titles and abstracts were screened and full text was reviewed for any article meeting inclusion criteria. If articles included both children and adults, incidence data were collected only if the number of pediatric patients could be ascertained. Of 471 full-text articles reviewed, 40 met inclusion criteria, of which 24 included only children, totaling 4104 patient transports. Heterogeneity was high, owing to a wide range of populations, settings, data collection methods, and outcomes. The incidence of adverse events varied widely between studies. Examples of harm included emergent tracheostomy, pneumothorax, and cardiac arrest requiring chest compressions. Respiratory and airway events were the most common type of adverse event. Hypothermia was common in infants. One transport-associated death was reported. When causation was assessed, most events were judged to have been preventable or potentially mitigated by improved double-checks and usage of checklists. Prospective studies demonstrated the superiority of mechanical ventilation over manual ventilation for intubated patients. Risk of adverse events during critical care transport appears to relate to the patient's underlying illness and degree of respiratory support. Recommendations for reducing these adverse events have frequently included the use of checklists. Other recommendations include optimization of the patient's physiological status before transport, training with transport equipment, double-checking of equipment before transport, and having experienced clinicians accompany the patient. All available recommendations for reducing transport-associated adverse events in included articles were collated and included.
Haydar B; Baetzel A; Elliott A; MacEachern M; Kamal A; Christensen R
Anesthesia & Analgesia
2020
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000004585" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1213/ane.0000000000004585</a>
Occurrence of withdrawal in critically ill sedated children
Child; Female; Male; Analgesics; Respiration; Time Factors; Medical Records; adolescent; Preschool; infant; retrospective studies; Dose-Response Relationship; Drug; Human; Artificial; Barbiturate/adverse effects; Critical Care/methods; Midazolam/adverse effects; Morphine/adverse effects; Nonbarbiturate/adverse effects; Opioid/adverse effects; Pentobarbital/adverse effects; Sedatives; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/etiology/therapy
OBJECTIVES: To record the number of children with withdrawal symptoms after the administration of sedatives for mechanical ventilation, and to discuss the possible connection with the administration of midazolam. DESIGN: Retrospective data collection from case records and charts. SETTING: Medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Children 6 months to 14 yrs of age who required sedation for mechanical ventilation (n = 40). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Kind and amount of sedatives and analgesics, duration of administration, and occurrence of withdrawal symptoms. The frequency of withdrawal symptoms was 35% (14/40) of the sedated children. A total dose of midazolam of >60 mg/kg was strongly significantly associated with occurrence of withdrawal. Statistical analysis to determine the occurrence of withdrawal associated with the administration of morphine was not possible. CONCLUSIONS: Signs and symptoms of a withdrawal reaction were observed in several children. The occurrence of withdrawal was statistically related to high doses of midazolam, but it was not possible to determine the influence of morphine. If large doses of midazolam and opioids have been administered, there may be justification for reducing the dose gradually instead of abruptly, or using longer-acting benzodiazepines or opioids on discontinuation of sedation.
1999
Fonsmark L; Rasmussen YH; Carl P
Critical Care Medicine
1999
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
Limiting And Withdrawing Life Support In The Picu: For Whom Are These Options Discussed?
Child; Child Preschool; Critical Care/methods; Female; Humans; Infant; Intensive Care Units Pediatric; Length Of Stay; Life Support Care/utilization; Logistic Models; Male; Prospective Studies; Resuscitation Orders; Severity Of Illness Index; Terminal Care/methods
Most deaths in U.S. PICUs occur after a decision has been made to limitation or withdrawal of life support. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of children whose families discussed limitation or withdrawal of life support with clinicians during their child's PICU stay and to determine the factors associated with limitation or withdrawal of life support discussions.
DESIGN:
Secondary analysis of data prospectively collected from a random sample of children admitted to PICUs affiliated with the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network between December 4, 2011, and April 7, 2013.
SETTING:
Seven clinical sites affiliated with the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network.
PATIENTS:
Ten thousand seventy-eight children less than 18 years old, admitted to a PICU, and not moribund at admission.
INTERVENTIONS:
None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:
Families of 248 children (2.5%) discussed limitation or withdrawal of life support with clinicians. By using a multivariate logistic model, we found that PICU admission age less than 14 days, reduced functional status prior to hospital admission, primary diagnosis of cancer, recent catastrophic event, emergent PICU admission, greater physiologic instability, and government insurance were independently associated with higher likelihood of discussing limitation or withdrawal of life support. Black race, primary diagnosis of neurologic illness, and postoperative status were independently associated with lower likelihood of discussing limitation or withdrawal of life support. Clinical site was also independently associated with likelihood of limitation or withdrawal of life support discussions. One hundred seventy-three children (69.8%) whose families discussed limitation or withdrawal of life support died during their hospitalization; of these, 166 (96.0%) died in the PICU and 149 (86.1%) after limitation or withdrawal of life support was performed. Of those who survived, 40 children (53.4%) were discharged with severe or very severe functional abnormalities, and 15 (20%) with coma/vegetative state.
CONCLUSIONS:
Clinical factors reflecting type and severity of illness, sociodemographics, and institutional practices may influence whether limitation or withdrawal of life support is discussed with families of PICU patients. Most children whose families discuss limitation or withdrawal of life support die during their PICU stay; survivors often have substantial disabilities.
Keele L; Meert KL; Berg RA; Dalton H; Newth CJ; Harrison R; Wessel DL; Shanley T; Carcillo J; Morrison W; Funai T; Holubkov R; Dean JM; Pollack M
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
2016
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000614