Competencies for Psychology Practice in Pediatric Palliative Care
competencies; critical illness; end-of-life care; interdisciplinary; Palliative Care; pediatric palliative care; Self Psychology
OBJECTIVE: Pediatric psychologists have unique expertise to contribute to the care of youth with serious illnesses yet are not routinely integrated into pediatric palliative care (PPC) teams. To better define the role and unique skillset of psychologists practicing in PPC, support their systematic inclusion as part of PPC teams, and advance trainee knowledge of PPC principles and skills, the PPC Psychology Working Group sought to develop core competencies for psychologists in this subspecialty. METHODS: A Working Group of pediatric psychologists with expertise in PPC met monthly to review literature and existing competencies in pediatrics, pediatric and subspecialty psychology, adult palliative care, and PPC subspecialties. Using the modified competency cube framework, the Working Group drafted core competencies for PPC psychologists. Interdisciplinary review was conducted by a diverse group of PPC professionals and parent advocates, and competencies were revised accordingly. RESULTS: The six competency clusters include Science, Application, Education, Interpersonal, Professionalism, and Systems. Each cluster includes essential competencies (i.e., knowledge, skills, attitudes, roles) and behavioral anchors (i.e., examples of concrete application). Reviewer feedback highlighted clarity and thoroughness of competencies and suggested additional consideration of siblings and caregivers, spirituality, and psychologists' own positionality. CONCLUSIONS: Newly developed competencies for PPC psychologists highlight unique contributions to PPC patient care and research and provide a framework for highlighting psychology's value in this emerging subspecialty. Competencies help to advocate for inclusion of psychologists as routine members of PPC teams, standardize best practices among the PPC workforce, and provide optimal care for youth with serious illness and their families.
Thompson AL; Schaefer MR; McCarthy SR; Hildenbrand AK; Cousino MK; Marsac ML; Majeski J; Wohlheiter K; Kentor RA
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
2023
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsad007" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1093/jpepsy/jsad007</a>
Experiences at the End of Life From the Perspective of Bereaved Parents: Results of a Qualitative Focus Group Study
Adult; Bereavement; cancer; child; communication; end of life; Focus Groups; Hospice Care; Humans; palliative care; Parents; Professional-Family Relations; Quality of Life; Time Factors
BACKGROUND: Palliative care principles are known to support the experiences of children and their families throughout the illness trajectory. However, there is little knowledge of the parental perceptions of care delivered and gaps experienced by families receiving end-of-life care. We report the most helpful aspects of care provided during the end of life and identify opportunities to improve care delivery during this critical time. METHODS: This study consists of 2 one-hour focus group sessions with 6 participants each facilitated by a clinical psychologist to explore the experiences of bereaved parents of pediatric oncology patients at the end of their child's life. The data were transcribed and coded using constant comparative analysis and evaluated for inter-rater reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Four common themes were identified through qualitative analysis: (1) valued communication qualities, (2) valued provider qualities, (3) unmet needs, and (4) parental experiences. The most prevalent of these themes was unmet needs (mentioned 51 times). Subthemes were identified and evaluated. Parents described struggling with communication from providers, loss of control in the hospital environment, and challenges associated with transition of care to hospice services. CONCLUSION: Interventions that support the complex needs of a family during end-of-life care are needed, especially with regard to coordination of care.
Sedig LK; Spruit JL; Paul TK; Cousino MK; Pituch K; Hutchinson R
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
2020
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/1049909119895496" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1177/1049909119895496</a>
Supporting Pediatric Patients and Their Families at the End of Life: Perspectives From Bereaved Parents
Academic Medical Centers; Anticipatory Guidance; Bereavement; Chi Square Test; Child; Childhood Neoplasms; Communication; Data Analysis Software; Decision Making; Descriptive Statistics; Family; Funding Source; Health Resource Utilization; Midwestern United States; Parental Attitudes – Evaluation; Patient Preference; Professional-Family Relations; Professional-Patient Relations; Psychosocial; Quality of Life; Questionnaires; Record Review; Retrospective Design; Shared; Support; Terminal Care – In Infancy and Childhood
Background: Cancer remains the leading cause of death by disease for children in the United States. It is imperative to optimize measures to support patients and families facing the end of a child's life. This study asked bereaved parents to reflect on their child's end-of-life care to identify which components of decision-making, supportive services, and communication were helpful, not helpful, or lacking. Methods: An anonymous survey about end-of-life experiences was sent to families of children treated at a single institution who died of a malignancy between 2010 and 2017. Results: Twenty-eight surveys were returned for a 30.8% response rate. Most of the bereaved parents (61%) reported a desire for shared decision-making; this was described by 52% of families at the end of their child's life. There was a statistically significant association between how well death went and whether the parental perception of actual decision-making aligned with desired decision-making (P =.002). Families did not utilize many of the supportive services that are available including psychology and psychiatry (only 22% used). Respondents felt that additional services would have been helpful. Conclusions: Health care providers should strive to participate in decision-making models that align with the preferences of the patient and family and provide excellent communication. Additional resources to support families following the death of a child should be identified for families or developed and funded if a gap in available services is identified.
Sedig LK; Spruit JL; Paul TK; Cousino MK; McCaffery H; Pituch K; Hutchinson R
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
2020
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/1049909120922973" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1177/1049909120922973</a>
Palliative care is not associated with decreased intensity of care: Results of a chart review from a large children's hospital
children; hospice; oncology; palliative care; pediatrics; treatment intensity
BACKGROUND: Palliative care is an important component of pediatric oncology care, especially for children who will not be cured of their disease. However, barriers remain to integration of this service. One barrier is the perception that it indicates "giving up." This study examined if palliative care involvement was associated with a decreased intensity of care at the end of life for children with malignancy at a large academic center with a well-established palliative care program. PROCEDURE: This is a retrospective chart review that measured intensity of care as the number of emergency department visits, hospital days, and intensive care unit days in the last one and three months of life. The data were compared for patients with and without palliative care involvement and with and without hospice involvement. RESULTS: Palliative involvement was not associated with a decrease in the intensity of care in the last three months of life. Hospice care was associated with a decreased intensity of care. These results held true in analyses adjusted for age at death, gender, and type of malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: These data can reassure patients, families, and providers that palliative involvement does not necessitate decreased intensity of care. Patients and families often choose hospice care to decrease the amount of time spent at the hospital and it was associated with meeting that goal.
Sedig LK; Spruit JL; Southwell J; Paul TK; Cousino MK; McCaffery H; Pituch K; Hutchinson R
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
2021
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.29391" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1002/pbc.29391</a>
Communication about prognosis and end-of-life in pediatric organ failure and transplantation
advance care planning; pediatric; communication; end-of-life; solid organ transplant
BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in treatment and survival, pediatric organ failure and transplant populations continue to face significant risks of morbidity and mortality. Little scientific attention has been given to addressing the end-of-life care needs of this growing population of young people. This study characterized current practices, beliefs, and challenges specific to the disclosure of prognosis and end-of-life care topics among providers caring for pediatric organ failure and transplant populations. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 144 healthcare providers actively caring for children, adolescents, and young adults with organ failure or solid organ transplant history. Participants completed an electronic survey measuring frequency and comfort in discussing the following topics with patients and parents: prognosis/survival statistics, re-transplantation, advance care planning (ACP), and death/dying. Descriptive statistics, two-sample t tests, and analysis of variance were used. RESULTS: Fewer than half of respondents regularly discuss prognosis/survival statistics and potential need for re-transplantation with their pediatric and young adult patients. Less than 20% of providers engage their pediatric patients in ACP discussions, and approximately 30% facilitate such discussions with young adult patients. Pediatric organ failure and transplant providers endorse a number of barriers specific to discussing these topics. CONCLUSION: Pediatric organ failure and transplant providers do not regularly discuss prognosis or end-of-life care topics with this patient population. Communication-focused intervention research is needed to improve honest and compassionate discussion of these topics that is aligned with both patients' and parents' needs and preferences.
Cousino MK; Schumacher KR; Magee J C; Wolfe J; Yu S; Eder SJ; Fredericks EM
Pediatric Transplantation
2019
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1111/petr.13373" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1111/petr.13373</a>