1
40
1
-
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
May 2020 List
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Citation List Month
May 2020 List
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-0654-9" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-0654-9</a>
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
"Quality of life": parent and neonatologist perspectives
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Journal of Perinatology
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2020
Subject
The topic of the resource
medical ethics; quality of life
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Adams S Y; Tucker R; Clark M A; Lechner B E
Description
An account of the resource
OBJECTIVE: To assess how physicians and families understand quality of life (QOL) for NICU patients, and to explore the feasibility of developing a standardized definition for QOL. STUDY DESIGN: Surveys were developed and administered to neonatologists and eligible families. Quantitative analysis was conducted using standard statistical methods. Qualitative analysis was conducted using NVivo software. Focus groups were conducted with the same groups, and audio recordings were obtained and analyzed for recurring themes. RESULTS: Both parents and physicians value QOL as a metric for guiding care in the NICU. Parents were more likely to accept higher levels of disability, while neonatologists were more likely to accept higher levels of dependence on medical equipment. In relation to infant QOL, predominant themes expressed in the parent focus groups were stress levels in the NICU, advocating as parents, and the way in which long-term outcomes were presented by the medical team; in the physician focus group, the ambiguity of predicting outcomes and thus QOL was the main theme. CONCLUSIONS: Both parents and physicians recognize the importance of QOL in the decision-making process for critically ill infants, but the two groups differ in their assessment of what QOL means in this context. These data suggest that QOL cannot be adequately defined for standardized use in a clinical context, and as such, should be used thoughtfully by neonatologists in discussions of end- of-life care.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-0654-9" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1038/s41372-020-0654-9</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2020
Adams S Y
Clark M A
Journal Of Perinatology
Lechner B E
May 2020 List
Medical Ethics
Quality Of Life
Tucker R