child; article; controlled study; female; human; major clinical study; male; retrospective study; palliative therapy; pediatric intensive care unit; school child; consultation; clinical feature; practice guideline; surgery; adolescent; infant; critically ill patient; intensive care unit; electronic medical record; traumatic brain injury; toddler; child abuse; total quality management; special situation for pharmacovigilance; childhood trauma; injury
Description
The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) and Committee on Trauma released a best practice guideline for palliative care in trauma patients in 2017. Utilization of pediatric palliative care services for pediatric trauma patients has not been studied. We sought to identify patients who received the consultation and develop criteria for patients who would benefit from these resources at our institution. Methods: The institutional pediatric trauma registry was queried to identify all admissions age 0-17 years old to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) or trauma ICU (TICU) from 2014 to 2021. Demographic and clinical features were obtained from the registry. Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify and review consultations to the ComPASS team. A clinical practice guideline (CPG) for palliative care consultations was developed based on the TQIP guideline and applied retrospectively to patients admitted 2014-2021. The CPG was then prospectively applied to patients admitted from March through November 2022. Results: A total of 399 patients were admitted to the PICU/TICU. There were 30 (7.5%) deaths, 20 (66.7%) within 24 hours of admission. Palliative care consultations were obtained in 21 (5.3%). Of these, 10 (47.6%) patients were infants/toddlers <age 2 years, all had traumatic brain injury, 3 (14.3%) were for suspected child abuse, and many were for "goals of care" or family meetings. When the CPG was applied retrospectively, 109 (27.3%) patients met criteria for consultation. After 8 months of prospective implementation of this CPG, palliative care consultation was obtained in 25% (7 of 28) of pediatric trauma patients admitted to the ICU. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate underused potential of the palliative care team to impact the hospital course of critically ill pediatric trauma patients. Ongoing studies will analyze the utility of CPG implementation for early involvement of palliative services in critically ill pediatric trauma patients. Level of evidence: Level III (retrospective cohort).
Rights
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
CONTEXT: Concerns for child maltreatment can complicate the provision of pediatric palliative care (PPC). Little is known about the vulnerable population of children with life-threatening conditions involved with PPC and state Child Protective Services (CPS) or hospital Child Protection Teams (CPT). More information is needed to inform and optimize collaborative care. OBJECTIVES: Define and describe the population of children with PPC involvement for whom there was concern for maltreatment. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective chart review of children with PPC involvement for whom there was concern for maltreatment, defined as involvement of CPS/CPT between 2005 and 2017. Medical and demographic variables were abstracted and analyzed. Analyses include descriptive tabulation and measurements of association between PPC and CPS/CPT variables. RESULTS: Among 1,804 children followed by PPC, 189 (10.4%) had documented CPS/CPT involvement. Among those, 113 (60%) had CPT involvement, 88 (47%) had concerns of medical neglect, and 100 (53%) had simultaneous CPS/CPT and PPC involvement. Goals of PPC consultation varied by clinical characteristics and concerns for medical neglect. Frequency of CPT involvement and physical abuse concerns also varied by child clinical characteristics. CONCLUSION: PPC practitioners regularly encounter children with CPS/CPT involvement. PPC practitioners should be are aware of the risk of maltreatment in their patients. Although rare in the general pediatric population, medical neglect is a relatively frequent maltreatment concern in children cared for by PPC. PPC practitioners have an opportunity to aid in proper evaluation of medical neglect in children they care for. Closer PPC collaboration with CPS/CPT may further optimize care.
Rights
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Female; Humans; infant; United States; Terminal Care; Parental Consent; referral and consultation; Medical Futility; Withholding Treatment; Life Support Care; Emergency Medical Services; Brain Injuries; Child Abuse; Skull Fractures
Rights
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Apparent Life Threatening Event/th [therapy]; Life-sustaining Medical Treatment; Medical Procedures; Practice Guideline; Article; Awareness; Caregiver; Child Abuse; Child Care; Clinical Decision Making; Comatose Patient; Consensus; Consultation; Critical Illness/th [therapy]; Death; Death By Neurologic Criteria; Developmental Disorder/th [therapy]; Disease Burden; Disease Course; Ethical Decision Making; Extremely Low Gestational Age; Family Decision Making; Family Stress; Foster Care; Gestational Age; Goal Attainment; Health Belief; High Risk Population; Human; Hydration; Imminent Death; Informed Consent; Intensive Care; Interpersonal Communication; Legal Aspect; Medical Ethics; Medical Expert; Medical Information; Medically Administered Nutrition And Hydration; Medical Specialist; Neglect; Neurologic Disease/di [diagnosis]; Nutrition; Oxygenation; Pain/th [therapy]; Palliative Therapy; Patient Care Planning; Pediatrician; Priority Journal; Prognosis; Quality Of Life; Resuscitation; Shared Decision Making; Social Support; Spiritual Care; Survival; Teamwork; Terminal Care; Tissue Perfusion; Uncertain Prognosis
Description
Pediatric health care is practiced with the goal of promoting the best interests of the child. Treatment generally is rendered under a presumption in favor of sustaining life. However, in some circumstances, the balance of benefits and burdens to the child leads to an assessment that forgoing life-sustaining medical treatment (LSMT) is ethically supportable or advisable. Parents are given wide latitude in decision-making concerning end-of-life care for their children in most situations. Collaborative decision-making around LSMT is improved by thorough communication among all stakeholders, including medical staff, the family, and the patient, when possible, throughout the evolving course of the patient's illness. Clear communication of overall goals of care is advised to promote agreed-on plans, including resuscitation status. Perceived disagreement among the team of professionals may be stressful to families. At the same time, understanding the range of professional opinions behind treatment recommendations is critical to informing family decision-making. Input from specialists in palliative care, ethics, pastoral care, and other disciplines enhances support for families and medical staff when decisions to forgo LSMT are being considered. Understanding specific applicability of institutional, regional, state, and national regulations related to forgoing LSMT is important to practice ethically within existing legal frameworks. This guidance represents an update of the 1994 statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics on forgoing LSMT.
Rights
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).