1
40
1
-
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
September 2020 List
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Citation List Month
September 2020 List
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2019.0646" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2019.0646</a>
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Face and Content Validity, Acceptability, and Feasibility of the Adapted Version of the Children's Palliative Outcome Scale: A Qualitative Pilot Study
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Journal of palliative medicine
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2020
Subject
The topic of the resource
Belgium; children; instrument; outcome assessment
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Friedel M; Brichard B; Boonen S; Tonon C; De Terwangne B; Bellis D; Mevisse M; Fonteyne C; Jaspard M; Schruse M; Harding R; Downing J; Namisango E; Degryse J M; Aujoulat I
Description
An account of the resource
Objective: To assess the face and content validity, acceptability and feasibility of a French version of the Children's Palliative Outcome Scale (CPOS). Background(s): Instruments in French used to measure outcomes in pediatric palliative care are lacking. Method(s): After forward-backward translation of the 12-item English CPOS to French, we conducted a qualitative pilot study. During semi structured interviews among children and parents, we used the CPOS, the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life interview guide (SEIQoL) and the Quality of Life in Life-threatening Illness-Family Carer questionnaire (QOLLTI-F), in addition to three expert meetings with PLTs. Result(s): Fourteen children and adolescents (8-18 years) with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions cared for at home, in hospital or in respite care services, 19 parents, and 9 members of 4 pediatric liaison teams (PLTs) providing palliative care in a Belgian francophone region were included in the study. No families refused to participate. All children with verbal capacities chose to be interviewed in the presence of their parents and a PLT member. The children valued being given the opportunity to share their experiences. New QOL dimensions pertaining to social, emotional, and administrative health-care related issues were added to the original version of the 12-item CPOS, leading to a 22-item CPOS-2. Discussion(s): The CPOS-2 was perceived as relevant and easy to use by the principal stakeholders. Our study paves the way for a large-scale field study assessing its psychometric characteristics and its implementation in routine clinical care.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2019.0646" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1089/jpm.2019.0646</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2020
Aujoulat I
Belgium
Bellis D
Boonen S
Brichard B
Children
De Terwangne B
Degryse J M
Downing J
Fonteyne C
Friedel M
Harding R
instrument
Jaspard M
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Mevisse M
Namisango E
outcome assessment
Schruse M
September 2020 List
Tonon C