Differences and similarities between mothers and fathers of premature children: a qualitative study of parents' coping experiences in a neonatal intensive care unit.
Humans; Infant, Newborn; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Adult; Qualitative Research; *Parent-Child Relations; Social Support; Object Attachment; *Professional-Family Relations; *Adaptation, Psychological; *Intensive Care Units, Neonatal; *Fathers/px [Psychology]; *Mothers/px [Psychology]; Intensive Care, Neonatal/mt [Methods]; *Intensive Care, Neonatal/px [Psychology]; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/og [Organization & Administration]; Intensive Care, Neonatal/og [Organization & Administration]
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore and describe the coping experiences of parents to children admitted to a neonatal unit., METHODS: A qualitative research approach was chosen, using in-depth interviews with eight fathers and eight mothers., RESULTS: The main findings were that parents with previous complicated births had more difficulties in coping compared to those parents with no experience with complications. Coping seemed easier where parents' opinions were heard regarding their baby's care and when both parents were present in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The main similarities between mothers and fathers were the reluctance to speak their opinions on childcare, and both experienced a sense of alienation and problems in bonding with the baby. They also needed a limitation on the number of visitors in the NICU. Differences between mothers and fathers were that fathers tried hard to be the strong partner in the relationship, and were more concerned with the mother if she was seriously ill postpartum, while mothers were more concerned for their baby. Mothers' postpartum period was felt as more stressful if the father was not present, but mothers were also better at welcoming support from the health personnel., CONCLUSION: This study highlights the parent's coping experiences in NICUs. Coping seemed easier where parents' opinions were heard. Nurses in the NICU should take the former experiences of the parents into consideration when nursing in the NICU and planning for discharge.
Hagen, I H; Iversen, V C; Svindseth, M F
BMC Pediatrics
2016
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0631-9" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/s12887-016-0631-9</a>
Hospital healthcare experiences of children and young people with life-threatening or life-shortening conditions, and their parents: scoping reviews and resultant conceptual frameworks.
Child; Only Child
Background: Patient experience is a core component of healthcare quality. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are increasingly used to assess this, but there are few paediatric PREMs. This paper reports the first stage of developing two such measures, one for children and young people (0-18 years) (CYP) with a life-threatening or life-shortening condition (LT/LSC), and one for their parents. It comprised parallel scoping reviews of qualitative evidence on the elements of health service delivery and care that matter to, or impact on, CYP (Review 1) and parents (Review 2). Methods: Medline and PsychINFO (1/1/2010 - 11/8/2020) and CINAHL Complete (1/1/2010 - 4/7/2020) were searched and records identified screened against inclusion criteria. A thematic approach was used to manage and analyse relevant data, informed by existing understandings of patient/family experiences as comprising aspects of staff's attributes, their actions and behaviours, and organisational features. The objective was to identity the data discrete elements of health service delivery and care which matter to, or impact on, CYP or parents which, when organised under higher order conceptual domains, created separate conceptual frameworks. Results: 18,531 records were identified. Sparsity of data on community-based services meant the reviews focused only on hospital-based (inpatient and outpatient) experiences. 53 studies were included in Review 1 and 64 in Review 2. For Review 1 (CYP), 36 discrete elements of healthcare experience were identified and organized under 8 higher order domains (e.g. staff's empathetic qualities; information-sharing/decision making; resources for socializing/play). In Review 2 (parents), 55 elements were identified and organized under 9 higher order domains. Some domains were similar to those identified in Review 1 (e.g. professionalism; information-sharing/decision-making), others were unique (e.g. supporting parenting; access to additional support). Conclusions: Multiple and wide-ranging aspects of the way hospital healthcare is organized and delivered matters to and impacts on CYP with LT/LSCs, and their parents. The aspects that matter differ between CYP and parents, highlighting the importance of measuring and understanding CYP and parent experience seperately. These findings are key to the development of patient/parent experience measures for this patient population and the resultant conceptual frameworks have potential application in service development.
Mukherjee S; Richardson N; Beresford B
BMC Pediatrics
2023
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="https://bmcpediatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12887-023-04151-6">10.1186/s12887-023-04151-6</a>
Intensity of end-of-life care among children with life-threatening conditions: a national population-based observational study
Child; Only Child; Terminal Care
Background Children with life-threatening conditions frequently experience high intensity care at the end of life, though most of this research only focused on children with cancer. Some research suggests inequities in care provided based on age, disease type, socioeconomic status, and distance that the child lives from a tertiary hospital. We examined: 1) the prevalence of indicators of high intensity end-of-life care (e.g., hospital stays, intensive care unit [ICU] stays, death in ICU, use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], use of mechanical ventilation) and 2) the association between demographic and diagnostic factors and each indicator for children with any life-threatening condition in Canada. Methods We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked health administrative data to examine care provided in the last 14, 30, and 90 days of life to children who died between 3 months and 19 years of age from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2014 from any underlying life-threatening medical condition. Logistic regression was used to model the association between demographic and diagnostic variables and each indicator of high intensity end-of-life care except number of hospital days where negative binomial regression was used. Results Across 2435 child decedents, the most common diagnoses included neurology (51.1%), oncology (38.0%), and congenital illness (35.9%), with 50.9% of children having diagnoses in three or more categories. In the last 30 days of life, 42.5% (n = 1035) of the children had an ICU stay and 36.1% (n = 880) died in ICU. Children with cancer had lower odds of an ICU stay (OR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.36–0.62) and ICU death (OR = 0.37; 95%CI = 0.28–0.50) than children with any other diagnoses. Children with 3 or more diagnoses (vs. 1 diagnosis) had higher odds of > 1 hospital stay in the last 30 days of life (OR = 2.08; 95%CI = 1.29–3.35). Living > 400 km (vs < 50 km) from a tertiary pediatric hospital was associated with higher odds of multiple hospitalizations (OR = 2.09; 95%CI = 1.33–3.33). Conclusion High intensity end of life care is prevalent in children who die from life threatening conditions, particularly those with a non-cancer diagnosis. Further research is needed to understand and identify opportunities to enhance care across disease groups.
Widger K; Brennenstuhl S; Nelson KE; Seow H; Rapoport A; Siden H; Vadeboncoeur C; Gupta S; Tanuseputro P
BMC Pediatrics
2023
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04186-9%5C">10.1186/s12887-023-04186-9\</a>"
Evaluation of children with severe neurological impairment admitted to hospital with pain and irritability
Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Children; Clinical pathway; Emergency Service, Hospital; Hospitalization; Hospitals, Pediatric; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Pain; Retrospective Studies; Severe neurological impairment; PIUO
BACKGROUND: Pain is the most common symptom reported by caregivers of children with severe neurological impairment (SNI), a descriptive term for children with disorders affecting the neurological system across multiple domains. In SNI, cognition, communication, and motor skills are impaired and other organ systems are impacted. Pain is difficult to identify and treat in children with SNI because of communication impairment. When a clear cause of pain is not determined, the term "Pain and Irritability of Unknown Origin (PIUO)" is used to describe pain-like behaviours. This study explores the clinical care received by children with SNI admitted to hospital after presenting to the emergency department of a tertiary pediatric hospital with pain or irritability. Findings are compared to the approach suggested in the PIUO pathway, an integrated clinical pathway for identifying and treating underlying causes of pain and irritability in children with complex conditions and limited communication. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of children (age 0 to 18 years inclusive) with diagnoses compatible with SNI presenting with pain, irritability, and/or unexplained crying that required hospitalization between January 1st, 2019 and December 31st, 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the clinical care received by children in whom a source of pain was identified or not. In children for whom no cause of pain was identified, investigations completed were compared to the PIUO pathway. RESULTS: Eight hospital admissions of six unique children were included for data analysis. A cause for pain and irritability was identified and resolved in three patients. In children with PIUO, there were gaps in history taking, physical examination, and investigations that might have allowed a cause of pain and irritability to be found. Pain was assessed using the r-FLACC pain scale and varying medications for pain/irritability were given during each hospital admission. CONCLUSION: Children with SNI admitted to a tertiary pediatric hospital did not undergo a standardized approach to identifying a cause of pain and irritability. Future efforts should explore the effectiveness of the PIUO pathway, a standardized approach to reducing and resolving pain in children with SNI.
Fishman I; Siden H; Vadeboncoeur C
BMC Pediatrics
2022
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03632-4" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/s12887-022-03632-4</a>
Advance Care Planning For Adolescents with Cancer and Their Parents: Study Protocol of the Boost Pacp Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial and Process Evaluation
Child; Adolescent; Humans; Terminal Care; Surveys and Questionnaires; Parents; Communication; Advance Care Planning; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Advance care planning; Neoplasms/therapy; Adolescent; Multi-Centre randomised controlled trial; Paediatric oncology; Paediatric palliative care; Parent-adolescent communication
BACKGROUND: Research has highlighted the need for evidence-based interventions to improve paediatric advance care planning (pACP) in adolescents with cancer. Although adolescents express the desire and ability to share their values, beliefs and preferences for treatment, there is a lack of structured multicomponent interventions to improve parent-adolescent communication on different ACP themes including those not limited to end-of-life care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation, context and mechanisms of impact of a novel ACP program in paediatric oncology. METHODS: We will conduct a multi-centre parallel-group randomised controlled superiority trial with embedded mixed-methods process evaluation in Flanders, Belgium. Adolescents aged 10-18 who have cancer, and their parent(s) will be recruited via all four university hospitals in Flanders, Belgium, and support groups. Families will be randomised to receive care as usual or the multicomponent BOOST pACP program, consisting of three conversation sessions between an external facilitator and the adolescent and parent(s). The primary endpoint is improved parent-adolescent communication from the perspective of the adolescent. Secondary endpoints are adolescents' and parents' attitudes, self-efficacy, intention and behaviour regarding talking about ACP themes with each other, parents' perspective of shared decision making in the last clinical encounter, and the paediatric oncologist's intention and behaviour regarding talking about ACP themes with the family. Measurements will be performed at baseline, at 3 months and at 7 months using structured self-reported questionnaires. We will perform a process evaluation in the intervention group, with measurement throughout and post-intervention, using structured diaries filled out by the facilitators, interviews with facilitators, interviews with involved paediatric oncology teams, and audio-recordings of the BOOST pACP conversations. DISCUSSION: The BOOST pACP program has been developed to stimulate conversations on ACP themes between parent(s) and the adolescents, simultaneously lowering the threshold to discuss similar themes with healthcare professionals, initiating a process of normalization and integration of ACP in standard care. This combined outcome and process evaluation aims to contribute to building the necessary evidence to improve ACP in paediatric oncology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at ISRCTN, ISRCTN33228289 . Registration date: January 22, 2021.
van Driessche A; De Vleminck A; Gilissen J; Kars MC; van der Werff TBJ; Deliens L; Cohen J; Beernaert K
BMC Pediatrics
2021
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02841-7" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/s12887-021-02841-7</a>
The BOOST paediatric advance care planning intervention for adolescents with cancer and their parents: development, acceptability and feasibility
BACKGROUND: Although advance care planning (ACP) has been widely recommended to support patient and family engagement in understanding the patient's values, preferences and goals of care, there are only a few models in paediatric oncology that capture ACP as a process of behaviour change. We aimed to develop and test the acceptability and feasibility of BOOST pACP (Benefits of Obtaining Ownership Systematically Together in paediatric Advance Care Planning) - an intervention to improve ACP in adolescents with cancer, their parents and paediatric oncologists. METHODS: Several methods informed the intervention development process: 1) Problem identification: interviews with 11 healthcare professionals working in paediatric oncology; 2) Identification of evidence: literature review of existing pACP tools and barriers and facilitators in performing pACP; 3) Logic model and 4) Intervention design: collaborative expert meetings with researchers and professionals in pACP; 5a) Acceptability test of the materials: interviews with nine healthcare professionals, four adolescents and young adults with cancer and six parents; 5b) Feasibility test of core intervention components with three families, including interviews about their experiences. RESULTS: The BOOST pACP intervention was iteratively developed and adapted, based on feedback from families, healthcare professionals, and pACP experts (e.g., components were changed, deleted, and added; formulation of themes and associated questions were amended to enhance acceptability). The core components of the BOOST pACP intervention include: four ACP conversation sessions with the adolescent and/or parent(s) provided by a trained facilitator, structured by interactive conversation cards covering different ACP themes, followed by a transfer of information from the intervention facilitator to the paediatric oncologist. Core intervention components were deemed feasible by all participating families. CONCLUSION: The BOOST pACP intervention was developed by close involvement of both adolescent patients and their parents, healthcare professionals and pACP experts. The final intervention and supporting materials are considered appropriate and feasible. Its effectiveness in improving parent-adolescent communication on ACP themes is currently being tested in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Researchers aiming to develop a complex psychosocial intervention for a vulnerable target group could use the step-by-step approach described in this paper.
van Driessche A; Gilissen J; De Vleminck A; Kars M; Fahner J; van der Werff TBJ; Deliens L; Cohen J; Beernaert K
BMC Pediatrics
2022
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03247-9" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/s12887-022-03247-9</a>
Key constituents for integration of care for children assisted with long-term home ventilation: a European study
Access to care; Care coordination; Caregivers; Child; Child Health; Child Health Services; Complex care needs; Europe; Family partnership; Governance; Home Care Services; Humans; Long-term home ventilation; Palliative care; Quality of care; Respiration Artificial; Respite care; Surveys and Questionnaires
BACKGROUND: The number of children requiring long-term home ventilation has consistently increased over the last 25 years. Given the growing population of children with complex care needs (CCNs), this was an important area of focus within the Models of Child Health Appraised (MOCHA) project, funded by the European Union (EU) under the Horizon 2020 programme. We examined the structures and processes of care in place for children with CCNs and identified key constituents for effective integration of care for these children at the community and acute care interface across 30 EU/ European Economic Area (EEA) countries. METHODS: This was a non-experimental descriptive study with an embedded qualitative element. Data were collected by a Country Agent in each of the 30 countries, a local expert in child health services. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and a thematic analysis was undertaken of the free text data provided. RESULTS: A total of 27 surveys were returned from a possible 30 countries (90.0%) countries. One respondent indicated that their country does not have children on long-term ventilation (LTV) in the home, therefore, responses of 26 countries (86.7%) were analysed. None of the responding countries reported that they had all of the core components in place in their country. Three themes emerged from the free text provided: 'family preparedness for transitioning to home', 'coordinated pathway to specialist care' and 'legal and governance structures'. CONCLUSIONS: While the clinical care of children on LTV in the acute sector has received considerable attention, the results identify the need for an enhanced focus on the care required following discharge to the community setting. The results highlight the need for a commitment to supporting care delivery that acknowledges the complexity of contemporary child health issues and the context of the families that become their primary care givers.
Brenner M; O'Shea MP; Larkin P; Berry J
BMC Pediatrics
2020
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-1979-4" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/s12887-020-1979-4</a>
Comorbidity patterns and socioeconomic inequalities in children under 15 with medical complexity: a population-based study
Administrative data; Child; Comorbidity; Health inequalities; Latent class analysis; Medical complexity; Socioeconomic factors
BACKGROUND: Children with medical complexity (CMC) denotes the profile of a child with diverse acute and chronic conditions, making intensive use of the healthcare services and with special health and social needs. Previous studies show that CMC are also affected by the socioeconomic position (SEP) of their family. The aim of this study is to describe the pathologic patterns of CMC and their socioeconomic inequalities in order to better manage their needs, plan healthcare services accordingly, and improve the care models in place. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with latent class analysis (LCA) of the CMC population under the age of 15 in Catalonia in 2016, using administrative data. LCA was used to define multimorbidity classes based on the presence/absence of 57 conditions. All individuals were assigned to a best-fit class. Each comorbidity class was described and its association with SEP tested. The Adjusted Morbidity Groups classification system (Catalan acronym GMA) was used to identify the CMC. The main outcome measures were SEP, GMA score, sex, and age distribution, in both populations (CMC and non-CMC) and in each of the classes identified. RESULTS: 71% of the CMC population had at least one parent with no employment or an annual income of less than €18,000. Four comorbidity classes were identified in the CMC: oncology (36.0%), neurodevelopment (13.7%), congenital and perinatal (19.8%), and respiratory (30.5%). SEP associations were: oncology OR 1.9 in boys and 2.0 in girls; neurodevelopment OR 2.3 in boys and 1.8 in girls; congenital and perinatal OR 1.7 in boys and 2.1 in girls; and respiratory OR 2.0 in boys and 2.0 in girls. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show the existence of four different patterns of comorbidities in CMC and a significantly high proportion of lower SEP children in all classes. These results could benefit CMC management by creating more efficient multidisciplinary medical teams according to each comorbidity class and a holistic perspective taking into account its socioeconomic vulnerability.
Carrilero N; Dalmau-Bueno A; García-Altés A
BMC Pediatrics
2020
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02253-z" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/s12887-020-02253-z</a>
The clinical practice guideline palliative care for children and other strategies to enhance shared decision-making in pediatric palliative care; pediatricians' critical reflections
Children; Clinical practice guideline; Interviews; Palliative care; Qualitative; Shared decision-making
BACKGROUND: Because of practice variation and new developments in palliative pediatric care, the Dutch Association of Pediatrics decided to develop the clinical practice guideline (CPG) palliative care for children. With this guideline, the association also wanted to precipitate an attitude shift towards shared decision-making (SDM) and therefore integrated SDM in the CPG Palliative care for children. The aim was to gain insight if integrating SDM in CPGs can potentially encourage pediatricians to practice SDM. Its objectives were to explore pediatricians' attitudes and thoughts regarding (1) recommendations on SDM in CPGs in general and the guideline Palliative care for children specifically; (2) other SDM enhancing strategies or tools linked to CPGs. METHODS: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Pediatricians (15) were recruited through purposive sampling in three university-based pediatric centers in the Netherlands. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, coded by at least two authors and analyzed with NVivo. RESULTS: Some pediatricians considered SDM a skill or attitude that cannot be addressed by clinical practice guidelines. According to others, however, clinical practice guidelines could enhance SDM. In case of the guideline Palliative care for children, the recommendations needed to focus more on how to practice SDM, and offer more detailed recommendations, preferring a recommendation stating multiple options. Most interviewed pediatricians felt that patient decisions aids were beneficial to patients, and could ensure that all topics relevant to the patient are covered, even topics the pediatrician might not consider him or herself, or deems less important. Regardless of the perceived benefit, some pediatricians preferred providing the information themselves instead of using a patient decision aid. CONCLUSIONS: For clinical practice guidelines to potentially enhance SDM, guideline developers should avoid blanket recommendations in the case of preference sensitive choices, and SDM should not be limited to recommendations on non-treatment decisions. Furthermore, preference sensitive recommendations are preferably linked with patient decision aids.
Dreesens D; Veul L; Westermann J; Wijnands N; Kremer L; van der Weijden T; Verhagen E
BMC Pediatrics
2019
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1849-0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/s12887-019-1849-0</a>
Decision-making at the limit of viability: The Austrian neonatal choice context
article; human; palliative therapy; controlled study; shared decision making; systematic review; nervous system malformation; newborn; statistics; Austria; Choice context; Communication strategies; Decision-making; ethicist; framing bias; head; high income country; Limit of viability; neonatologist; neonatology; Neonatology; nicu; pregnancy; prematurity; semi structured interview
Background: We aimed to explore the shared decision-making context at the limit of viability (weeks 22-25 of gestation) through analyzing neonatologist's communication strategies with parents and their possible impact on survival and neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) outcomes. Method(s): A mixed methods approach was applied where a systematic literature search and in-depth semi-structured interviews with five heads of neonatology departments and one clinical ethicist from the Austrian context were integrated into a literature review. The aim was to identify decision practice models and the choice context specific to Austria. Result(s): Professional biases, parental understanding, and the process of information giving were identified as aspects possibly influencing survival and NDI outcomes. Institutions create self-fulfilling prophecies by recommending intensive/palliative care based upon their institutional statistics, yet those vary considerably among high-income countries. Labelling an extremely preterm (EP) infant by the gestational week was shown to skew the estimates for survival while the process of information giving was shown to be subject to framing effect and other cognitive biases. Conclusion(s): Communication strategies of choice options to parents may have an impact on the way parents decide and hence also on the outcomes of EP infants. Copyright � 2019 The Author(s).
Stanak M; Hawlik K
BMC Pediatrics
2019
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1569-5" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/s12887-019-1569-5</a>
A post-mortem population survey on foetal-infantile end-of-life decisions: a research protocol
Neonates; End-of-life decisions; Mortality follow-back survey; Population-based; Stillbirths; Termination of pregnancy
BACKGROUND: The death of a child before or shortly after birth is frequently preceded by an end-of-life decision (ELD). Population-based studies of incidence and characteristics of ELDs in neonates and infants are rare, and those in the foetal-infantile period (> 22 weeks of gestation - 1 year) including both neonates and stillborns, are non-existent. However, important information is missed when decisions made before birth are overlooked. Our study protocol addresses this knowledge gap. METHODS: First, a new and encompassing framework was constructed to conceptualise ELDs in the foetal-infantile period. Next, a population mortality follow-back survey in Flanders (Belgium) was set up with physicians who certified all death certificates of stillbirths from 22 weeks of gestation onwards, and infants under the age of a year. Two largely similar questionnaires (stillbirths and neonates) were developed, pilot tested and validated, both including questions on ELDs and their preceding decision-making processes. Each death requires a postal questionnaire to be sent to the certifying physician. Anonymity of the child, parents and physician is ensured by a rigorous mailing procedure involving a lawyer as intermediary between death certificate authorities, physicians and researchers. Approval by medical societies, ethics and privacy commissions has been obtained. DISCUSSION: This research protocol is the first to study ELDs over the entire foetal-infantile period on a population level. Based on representative samples of deaths and stillbirths and applying a trustworthy anonymity procedure, the research protocol can be used in other countries, irrespective of legal frameworks around perinatal end-of-life decision-making.
Dombrecht L; Beernaert K; Roets E; Chambaere K; Cools F; Goossens L; Naulaers G; De Catte L; Cohen J; Deliens L
BMC Pediatrics
2018
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here.
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1218-4" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/s12887-018-1218-4</a>
Patterns of paediatric end-of-life care: A chart review across different care settings in Switzerland
terminal care; human; child; female; male; cohort analysis; neurology; newborn; article; neonatology; home care; major clinical study; retrospective study; child care; Switzerland; oncology; resuscitation; medical record review; child death; life sustaining treatment; treatment withdrawal; health care utilization; hospital admission; 103-90-2 (paracetamol); paracetamol; adolescent; infant; intensive care unit; cause of death; length of stay; drug use; cardiology; community care; invasive procedure; narcotic analgesic agent
Background: Paediatric end-of-life care is challenging and requires a high level of professional expertise. It is important that healthcare teams have a thorough understanding of paediatric subspecialties and related knowledge of disease-specific aspects of paediatric end-of-life care. The aim of this study was to comprehensively describe, explore and compare current practices in paediatric end-of-life care in four distinct diagnostic groups across healthcare settings including all relevant levels of healthcare providers in Switzerland. Methods: In this nationwide retrospective chart review study, data from paediatric patients who died in the years 2011 or 2012 due to a cardiac, neurological or oncological condition, or during the neonatal period were collected in 13 hospitals, two long-term institutions and 10 community-based healthcare service providers throughout Switzerland. Results: Ninety-three (62%) of the 149 reviewed patients died in intensive care units, 78 (84%) of them following withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Reliance on invasive medical interventions was prevalent, and the use of medication was high, with a median count of 12 different drugs during the last week of life. Patients experienced an average number of 6.42 symptoms. The prevalence of various types of symptoms differed significantly among the four diagnostic groups. Overall, our study patients stayed in the hospital for a median of six days during their last four weeks of life. Seventy-two patients (48%) stayed at home for at least one day and only half of those received community-based healthcare. Conclusions: The study provides a wide-ranging overview of current end-of-life care practices in a real-life setting of different healthcare providers. The inclusion of patients with all major diagnoses leading to disease- and prematurity-related childhood deaths, as well as comparisons across the diagnostic groups, provides additional insight and understanding for healthcare professionals. The provision of specialised palliative and end-of-life care services in Switzerland, including the capacity of community healthcare services, need to be expanded to meet the specific needs of seriously ill children and their families.
Zimmermann K; Cignacco E; Engberg S; Ramelet AS; von der Weid N; Eskola K; Bergstraesser E; Ansari M; Aebi C; Baer R; Popovic MB; Bernet V; Brazzola P; Bucher HU; Buder R; Cagnazzo S; Dinten B; Dorsaz A; Elmer F; Enriquez R; Fahrni-Nater P; Finkbeiner G; Frey B; Frey U; Greiner J; Hassink RI; Keller S; Kretschmar O; Kroell J; Laubscher B; Leibundgut K; Malaer R; Meyer A; Stuessi C; Nelle M; Neuhaus T; Niggli F; Perrenoud G; Pfammatter JP; Plecko B; Rupf D; Sennhauser F; Stade C; Steinlin M; Stoffel L; Thomas K; Vonarburg C; von Vigier R; Wagner B; Wieland J; Wernz B
BMC Pediatrics
2018
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here.
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1021-2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/s12887-018-1021-2</a>
Decision-making at the limit of viability: Differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses
infant mortality; medical decision making; nurse attitude; physician attitude; adult; article; assisted ventilation; controlled study; enteric feeding; female; hospital policy; human; legal aspect; male; medical practice; neonatal intensive care unit; neonatal nurse; neonatologist; patient participation; prematurity; questionnaire; religion; Switzerland; terminal care; work experience
Background: In the last 20 years, the chances for intact survival for extremely preterm infants have increased in high income countries. Decisions about withholding or withdrawing intensive care remain a major challenge in infants born at the limits of viability. Shared decision-making regarding these fragile infants between health care professionals and parents has become the preferred model today. However, there is an ongoing ethical debate on how decisions regarding life-sustaining treatment should be reached and who should have the final word when health care professionals and parents do not agree. We designed a survey among neonatologists and neonatal nurses to analyze practices, difficulties and parental involvement in end-of-life decisions for extremely preterm infants. Methods: All 552 physicians and nurses with at least 12 months work experience in level III neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Switzerland were invited to participate in an online survey with 50 questions. Differences between neonatologists and NICU nurses and between language regions were explored. Results: Ninety six of 121 (79%) physicians and 302 of 431(70%) nurses completed the online questionnaire. The following difficulties with end-of-life decision-making were reported more frequently by nurses than physicians: insufficient time for decision-making, legal constraints and lack of consistent unit policies. Nurses also mentioned a lack of solidarity in our society and shortage of services for disabled more often than physicians. In the context of limiting intensive care in selected circumstances, nurses considered withholding tube feedings and respiratory support less acceptable than physicians. Nurses were more reluctant to give parents full authority to decide on the course of action for their infant. In contrast to professional category (nurse or physician), language region, professional experience and religion had little influence if any on the answers given. Conclusions: Physicians and nurses differ in many aspects of how and by whom end-of-life decisions should be made in extremely preterm infants. The divergencies between nurses and physicians may be due to differences in ethics education, varying focus in patient care and direct exposure to the patients. Acknowledging these differences is important to avoid potential conflicts within the neonatal team but also with parents in the process of end-of-life decision-making in preterm infants born at the limits of viability.Copyright © 2018 The Author(s).
Bucher HU; Klein SD; Hendriks MJ; Baumann-Holzle R; Berger TM; Streuli JC; Fauchere JC; Philipp M; Roland N; Renate I; Mathias N; Liliane S; Brigitte S; Kai R; Riccardo P; Matthias R; Magali C; Ulrike S; Gudrun J; Ruth D; Jean-Claude F; Barbara D
BMC Pediatrics
2018
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here.
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1040-z" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/s12887-018-1040-z</a>
End-of-life decisions and practices for very preterm infants in the Wallonia-Brussels Federation of Belgium
Brussels Capital Region; prematurity; Wallonia; article; clinical practice; female; gestational age; human; infant; major clinical study; male; neonatologist; neonatology; newborn; palliative therapy; perinatal period; qualitative research; questionnaire; terminal care; uncertainty
Background: Very preterm birth (24 to < 32 week's gestation) is a major public health issue due to its prevalence, the clinical and ethical questions it raises and the associated costs. It raises two major clinical and ethical dilemma: (i) during the perinatal period, whether or not to actively manage a baby born very prematurely and (ii) during the postnatal period, whether or not to continue a curative treatment plan initiated at birth. The Wallonia-Brussels Federation in Belgium counts 11 neonatal intensive care units. Methods: An inventory of key practices was compiled on the basis of an online questionnaire that was sent to the 65 neonatologists working in these units. The questionnaire investigated care-related decisions and practices during the antenatal, perinatal and postnatal periods, as well as personal opinions on the possibility of standardising and/or legislating for end-of-life decisions and practices. The participation rate was 89% (n = 58). Results: The results show a high level of homogeneity pointing to overall agreement on the main principles governing curative practice and the gestational age that can be actively managed given the current state of knowledge. There was, however, greater diversity regarding principles governing the transition to end-of-life care, as well as opinions about the need for a common protocol or law to govern such practices. Conclusion: Our results reflect the uncertainty inherent in the complex and diverse situations that are encountered in this extreme area of clinical practice, and call for qualitative research and expert debates to further document and make recommendations for best practices regarding several "gray zones" of end-of-life care in neonatology, so that high quality palliative care may be granted to all neonates concerned with end-of-life decisions.Copyright © 2018 The Author(s).
Aujoulat I; Henrard S; Charon A; Johansson AB; Langhendries JP; Mostaert A; Vermeylen D; Verellen G; Maton P; Van Overmeire B; Kalenga M; Broux I; Henrion E; Dussart A; Muller MF; Cavatorta E; Marechal Y; Vanden ES; Lecart C; Haumont D; Van Herreweghe I; Vlieghe V; Debauche C; Flausch M; Sepulchre B
BMC Pediatrics
2018
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1168-x" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/s12887-018-1168-x</a>
When to stop? Decision-making when children's cancer treatment is no longer curative: a mixed-method systematic review
decision making; oncology; review
BACKGROUND: Children with cancer, parents, and clinicians, face difficult decisions when cure is no longer possible. Little is known about decision-making processes, how agreement is reached, or perspectives of different actors. Professionals voice concerns about managing parental expectations and beliefs, which can be contrary to their own and may change over time. We conducted the first systematic review to determine what constitutes best medico-legal practice for children under 19 years as context to exploring the perspectives of actors who make judgements and decisions when cancer treatment is no longer curative. METHODS: Theory-informed mixed-method thematic systematic review with theory development. RESULTS: Eight legal/ethical guidelines and 18 studies were included. Whilst there were no unresolved dilemmas, actors had different perspectives and motives. In line with guidelines, the best interests of the individual child informed decisions, although how different actors conceptualized 'best interests' when treatment was no longer curative varied. Respect for autonomy was understood as following child/parent preferences, which varied from case to case. Doctors generally shared information so that parents alone could make an informed decision. When parents received reliable information, and personalized interest in their child, they were more likely to achieve shared trust and clearer transition to palliation. Although under-represented in research studies, young people's perspectives showed some differences to those of parents and professionals. For example, young people preferred to be informed even when prognosis was poor, and they had an altruistic desire to help others by participating in research. CONCLUSION: There needs to be fresh impetus to more effectively and universally implement the ethics of professionalism into daily clinical practice in order to reinforce humanitarian attitudes. Ethical guidelines and regulations attempt to bring professionals together by articulating shared values. While important, ethics training must be supported by institutions/organizations to assist doctors to maintain good professional standards. Findings will hopefully stimulate further normative and descriptive lines of research in this complex under-researched field. Future research needs to be undertaken through a more deliberative cultural lens that includes children's and multi-disciplinary team members' perspectives to more fully characterize and understand the dynamics of the decision-making process in this specific end-of life context.
2014
Valdez-Martinez E; Noyes J; Bedolla M
Bmc Pediatrics
2014
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-124" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1186/1471-2431-14-124</a>
Pediatric complex chronic conditions classification system version 2: updated for ICD-10 and complex medical technology dependence and transplantation
2014
Feudtner C; Feinstein J; Zhong W; Hall M; Dai D
Bmc Pediatrics
2014
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
Chronic pain treatment in children and adolescents: less is good, more is sometimes better
Interdisciplinary; Intensive inpatient treatment; Outpatient treatment; Paediatric chronic pain
In children with chronic pain, interdisciplinary outpatient and intensive inpatient treatment has been shown to improve pain intensity and disability. However, there are few systematic comparisons of outcomes of the two treatments. The present naturalistic study aimed to compare the clinical presentation and achieved changes at return in three outcome domains (pain intensity, disability, school absence) between a) outpatients vs. inpatients and b) patients who declined intensive inpatient treatment and completed outpatient treatment instead (decliners) vs. those who completed inpatient treatment (completers). PMID: 25308551
2014-10
Hechler T; Wager J; Zernikow B
Bmc Pediatrics
2014
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-262" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1186/1471-2431-14-262</a>
What do bereaved parents want from professionals after the sudden death of their child: a systematic review of the literature
jsessionid=BFE3713CAABF8B3054BD2CFB4B108161?contentType=1033§ion=6591
Garstang J; Griffiths F; Sidebotham P
Bmc Pediatrics
2014
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-269" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1186/1471-2431-14-269</a>
Designing and implementing a longitudinal study of children with neurological, genetic or metabolic conditions: charting the territory
Child; Humans; Canada; Longitudinal Studies; Mental Disorders; Biomedical Research; PEDI Study; Metabolic Diseases; Genetic Diseases; Inborn; Biomedical Research/methods; Canada; Child; Genetic Diseases Inborn/therapy; Humans; Longitudinal Studies/methods; Mental Disorders/therapy; Metabolic Diseases/therapy
BACKGROUND: Children with progressive metabolic, neurological, or chromosomal conditions and their families anticipate an unknown lifespan, endure unstable and often painful symptoms, and cope with erratic emotional and spiritual crises as the condition progresses along an uncertain trajectory towards death. Much is known about the genetics and pathophysiology of these diseases, but very little has been documented about the trajectory of symptoms for children with these conditions or the associated experience of their families. A longitudinal study design will help to close this gap in knowledge. METHODS/DESIGN: Charting the Territory is a longitudinal descriptive, correlational study currently underway with children 0-19 years who are diagnosed with progressive neurological, metabolic, or chromosomal conditions and their families. The purpose of the study is to determine and document the clinical progression of the condition and the associated bio-psychosocial-spiritual experiences of the parents and siblings age 7-18 years. Approximately 300 families, both newly diagnosed children and those with established conditions, are being recruited in six Canadian cities. Children and their families are being followed for a minimum of 18 months, depending on when they enroll in the study. Family data collection will continue after the child's death if the child dies during the study period. Data collection includes monthly parental assessment of the child's symptoms; an annual functional assessment of the child; and completion of established instruments every 6 months by parents to assess family functioning, marital satisfaction, health status, anxiety, depression, stress, burden, grief, spirituality, and growth, and by siblings to assess coping and health. Impact of participation on parents is assessed after 1 year and at the end of the study. Chart reviews are conducted at enrollment and at the conclusion of the study or at the time of the child's death. DISCUSSION: Knowledge developed from this study will provide some of the first-ever detailed descriptions of the clinical symptom trajectory of these non-curable progressive conditions and the bio-psychosocial-spiritual aspects for families, from diagnosis through bereavement. Information about developing and implementing this study may be useful to other researchers who are interested in designing a longitudinal study.
Siden H; Steele R; Brant R; Cadell S; Davies B; Straatman L; Widger K; Andrews GS
BMC Pediatrics
2010
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-67" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1186/1471-2431-10-67</a>
Incidence rates of progressive childhood encephalopathy in Oslo, Norway: a population based study
BACKGROUND: Progressive encephalopathy (PE) in children is a heterogeneous group of diseases mainly composed of metabolic diseases, but it consists also of neurodegenerative disorders where neither metabolic nor other causes are found. We wanted to estimate the incidence rate and aetiology of PE, as well as the age of onset of the disease. METHODS: We included PE cases born between 1985 and 2003, living in Oslo, and registered the number presenting annually between 1985 and 2004. Person-years at risk between 0 and 15 years were based on the number of live births during the observation period which was divided into four 5-year intervals. We calculated incidence rates according to age at onset which was classified as neonatal (0-4 weeks), infantile (1-12 months), late infantile (1-5 years), and juvenile (6-12 years). RESULTS: We found 84 PE cases representing 28 diagnoses among 1,305,997 person years, giving an incidence rate of 6.43 per 100,000 person years. The age-specific incidence rates per 100,000 were: 79.89 (5 years). 66% (55/84) of the cases were metabolic, 32% (27/54) were neurodegenerative, and 2% (2/84) had HIV encephalopathy. 71% (60/84) of the cases presented at < 1 year, 24% (20/84) were late infantile presentations, and 5% (4/84) were juvenile presentations. Neonatal onset was more common in the metabolic (46%) (25/55) compared to the neurodegenerative group (7%) (2/27). 20% (17/84) of all cases were classified as unspecified neurodegenerative disease. CONCLUSION: The overall incidence rate of PE was 6.43 per 100,000 person years. There was a strong reduction in incidence rates with increasing age. Two-thirds of the cases were metabolic, of which almost half presented in the neonatal period.
2007
Stromme P; Kanavin OJ; Abdelnoor M; Woldseth B; Rootwelt T; Diderichsen J; Bjurulf B; Sommer F; Magnus P
Bmc Pediatrics
2007
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-7-25" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1186/1471-2431-7-25</a>
Conceptualizing childhood health problems using survey data: a comparison of key indicators
Miller 2009 BMC HSR Refs
2007
Kohen DE; Brehaut JC; Garner RE; Miller AR; Lach LM; Klassen AF
Bmc Pediatrics
2007
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-7-40" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1186/1471-2431-7-40</a>
Rationales, design and recruitment for the Elfe longitudinal study
Study Design
BACKGROUND: Many factors act simultaneously in childhood to influence health status, life chances and well being, including pre-birth influences, the environmental pollutants of early life, health status but also the social influences of family and school. A cohort study is needed to disentangle these influences and explore attribution. METHODS: Elfe will be a nationally representative cohort of 20 000 children followed from birth to adulthood using a multidisciplinary approach. The cohort will be based on the INSEE Permanent Demographic Panel (EDP) established using census data and civil records. The sample size has been defined in order to match the representativeness criteria and to obtain some prevalence estimation, but also to address the research area of low exposure/rare effects. The cohort will be based on repeated surveys by face to face or phone interview (at birth and each year) as well as medical interview (at 2 years) and examination (at 6 years). Furthermore, biological samples will be taken at birth to evaluate the foetal exposition to toxic substances, environmental sensors will be placed in the child's homes. Pilot studies have been initiated in 2007 (500 children) with an overall acceptance rate of 55% and are currently under progress, the 2-year survey being carried out in October this year. DISCUSSION: The longitudinal study will provide a unique source of data to analyse the development of children in their environment, to study the various factors interacting throughout the life course up to adulthood and to determine the impact of childhood experience on the individual's physical, psychological, social and professional development.
2009
Vandentorren S; Bois C; Pirus C; Sarter H; Salines G; Leridon H; team Elfe
Bmc Pediatrics
2009
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-9-58" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1186/1471-2431-9-58</a>
Children in reviews: methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses
PedPal Lit; Clodronate
BACKGROUND: The delivery of optimal medical care to children is dependent on the availability of child relevant research. Our objectives were to: i) systematically review and describe how children are handled in reviews of drug interventions published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR); and ii) determine when effect sizes for the same drug interventions differ between children and adults. METHODS: We systematically identified all of the reviews relevant to child health in the CDSR 2002, Issue 4. Reviews were included if they investigated the efficacy or effectiveness of a drug intervention for a condition that occurs in both children and adults. Information was extracted on review characteristics including study methods, results, and conclusions. RESULTS: From 1496 systematic reviews, 408 (27%) were identified as relevant to both adult and child health; 52% (213) of these included data from children. No significant differences were found in effect sizes between adults and children for a ny of the drug interventions or conditions investigated. However, all of the comparisons lacked the power to detect a clinically significant difference and wide confidence intervals suggest important differences cannot be excluded. A large amount of data was unavailable due to inadequate reporting at the trial and systematic review level. CONCLUSION: Overall, the findings of this study indicate there is a paucity of child-relevant and specific evidence generated from evidence syntheses of drug interventions. The results indicate a need for a higher standard of reporting for participant populations in studies of drug interventions.;
2005
Cramer K; Wiebe N; Moyer V; Hartling L; Williams K; Swingler G; Klassen TP
Bmc Pediatrics
2005
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-5-38" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1186/1471-2431-5-38</a>
Identification of pain indicators for infants at risk for neurological impairment: a Delphi consensus study
Delphi Technique; NET Grey Lit; Delphi Method
Background: A number of infant pain measures have been developed over the past 15 years incorporating behavioural and physiologic indicators; however, no reliable or valid measure exists for infants who are at risk for neurological impairments (NI). The objective of this study was to establish consensus about which behavioural, physiologic and contextual indicators best characterize pain in infants at high, moderate and low levels of risk for NI. Methods: A 39- item, self-administered electronic survey that included infant physiologic, behavioural and contextual pain indicators was used in a two round Delphi consensus exercise. Fourteen pediatric pain experts were polled individually and anonymously on the importance and usefulness of the pain indicators for the 3 differing levels of risk for NI. Results: The strength of agreement between expert raters was moderate in Round 1 and fair in Round 2. In general, pain indicators with the highest concordance for all three groups were brow bulge, facial grimace, eye squeeze, and inconsolability. Increased heart rate from baseline in the moderate and severe groups demonstrated high concordance. In the severe risk group, fluctuations in heart rate and reduced oxygen saturation were also highly rated. Conclusions: These data constitute the first step in contributing to the development and validation of a pain measure for infants at risk for NI. In future research, we will integrate these findings with the opinions of (a) health care providers about the importance and usefulness of infant pain indicators and (b) the pain responses of infants at mild, moderate and high risk for NI.
2006
Stevens B; McGrath P; Yamada J; Gibbins S; Beyene J; Breau L; Camfield C; Finley A; Franck L; Howlett A; Johnston C; McKeever P; O'Brien K; Ohlsson A
Bmc Pediatrics
2006
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-6-1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1186/1471-2431-6-1</a>
Caregiving process and caregiver burden: conceptual models to guide research and practice.
Child; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support; Adaptation; Psychological; Caregivers/psychology; Models; Parents/psychology; Psychological; Stress; disabled children
BACKGROUND: Parental care for a child with a developmental disability is an enormous responsibility, one that can far exceed that of typical parental care. While most parents adapt well to the situation of caring for a child with a disability, some do not. To understand parents' adaptations to their children's disabilities, the complex nature of stress processes must be accounted for and the constructs and factors that play a role in the caregiving must be considered. DISCUSSION: Evidence suggests that there is considerable variation in how caregivers adapt to their caregiving demands. Many studies have sought to qualify the association between caregiving and health outcomes of the caregivers. Contextual factors such as SES, child factors such as child behaviour problems and severity of disability, intra-psychic factors such as mastery and self-esteem, coping strategies and social supports have all been associated with psychological and/or physical outcome or parents or primary caregivers. In reviewing these issues, the literature appears to be limited by the use of traditional analytic approaches which examine the relationship between a factor and an outcome. It is clear, however, that changes to single factors, as represented in these studies, occur very rarely even in the experimental context. The literature has also been limited by lack of reliance on specific theoretical frameworks. SUMMARY: This conceptual paper documents the state of current knowledge and explores the current theoretical frameworks that have been used to describe the caregiving process from two diverse fields, pediatrics and geriatrics. Integration of these models into one comprehensive model suitable for this population of children with disabilities and their caregivers is proposed. This model may guide future research in this area.
2004-01
Raina P; O'Donnell ME; Schwellnus H; Rosenbaum P; King G; Brehaut J; Russell D; Swinton M; King S; Wong M; Walter SD; Wood E
Bmc Pediatrics
2004
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-4-1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1186/1471-2431-4-1</a>