Was there a plan? End-of-life care for children with life-limiting conditions: a review of multi-service healthcare records
Child; Female; Humans; Male; Advance Directives; Physician-Patient Relations; Pediatrics; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Communication; Resuscitation Orders; Time Factors; quality of life; end of life; adolescent; Preschool; decision making; infant; retrospective studies; DNAR; Parents; documentation; Parents/px [Psychology]; Terminal Care; Patient Care Planning/og [Organization & Administration]; Terminal Care/og [Organization & Administration]; review; Medical Records; Neoplasms; advance planning; child and family wishes; Neoplasms/mo [Mortality]; Patient Care Planning/st [Standards]; Terminal Care/px [Psychology]
BACKGROUND: Planning for care at the end of life (EoL) is an essential component of support and care for families of children with life-limiting conditions. The purpose of this review was to compare documented EoL planning with published children's palliative care standards, across a range of children's healthcare services and to assess the impact on practice of written guidelines to support EoL care planning. METHOD: A manual retrospective review of healthcare records using a purpose-built form. Inclusion criteria were the records of children with a diagnosed life-limiting or life-threatening condition, who had died before the age of 18 years, between October 2008 and March 2010, within a defined geographical area served by one or more of the participating services. The sample was 114 sets of notes relating to a cohort of 48 children: 24 girls and 24 boys, the majority of whose deaths were cancer related. RESULTS: Examples of good practice were found in the records of individual services. Services had each developed their own systems and documents to support EoL care planning rather than using a unified documentation system. Where documented practice fell short, this was related to a lack of evidence that choice in location of death had been offered, delays in sharing of information between services, and information being buried in the narrative of the notes, making it difficult to find. CONCLUSIONS: Current documented EoL planning varies between services. Those who are infrequently involved in the provision of EoL care may benefit from support by those for whom this is part of their daily working life. These professionals can help prepare staff to engage families in these difficult but important conversations - and encourage them to document them in a way that can be easily and readily accessed and shared.
2014-03
Beringer AJ; Heckford EJ
Child: Care, Health And Development
2014
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12020" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1111/cch.12020</a>
Advance Care Planning: Challenges and Approaches for Pediatricians
advance care planning
Abstract Background: There is increasing recognition of the value of advance care planning for children with life-limiting conditions. It is important that we acknowledge and reflect on the challenges that this work presents in order to optimize practice. Objective: Our aim was to review advance care planning for children with life-threatening or life-limiting conditions (LTLLCs) in our local area. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case note review. Study subjects were from two National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in Bristol in the United Kingdom. Cases were identified from Child Death Overview Panel data. Forty-two sets of case notes were reviewed in relation to 20 children. Measurements included quantitative and qualitative review of advance care planning in relation to standards set by The Association for Children's Palliative Care (ACT). Results: In 25% of cases there was no documented discussion with families about the approach to end of life (EOL). In 25% of cases there was no evidence of an advance care plan, and the content and accessibility of those that did exist was variable. Forty-five percent of families were not offered a choice with regard to location of care (LOC) in the last months of life and 50% were not offered a choice about location of death (LOD). Conclusions: We hope that acknowledgement of some of the challenges, alongside recognition of the clear benefits, of planning will help pediatricians to deliver this important area of care.
2014-06
Heckford EJ; Beringer AJ
Journal Of Palliative Medicine
2014
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2013.0374" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1089/jpm.2013.0374</a>