Polypharmacy among Pediatric Cancer Patients Dying In the Hospital
Child; Female; Humans; Male; Resuscitation Orders; Demography; Health Services Research; Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data; Neoplasm Staging; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use; Neoplasms/drug therapy/mortality/pathology; Palliative Care/methods/statistics & numerical data; Polypharmacy; Terminal Care/methods/statistics & numerical data; Critical Pathways/statistics & numerical data; Israel/epidemiology; Steroids/therapeutic use
BACKGROUND: Decisions on medication treatment in children dying from cancer are often complex and may result in polypharmacy and increased medication burden. There is no information on medication burden in pediatric cancer patients at the end of life (EOL). OBJECTIVES: To characterize medication burden during the last hospitalization in children dying from cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study based on medical records of 90 children who died from cancer in hospital between 01 January 2010 and 30 December 2018. Demographic and clinical information were collected for the last hospitalization. We compared medication burden (number of medication orders) at hospitalization and at time of death and examined whether changes in medication burden were associated with clinical and demographic parameters. RESULTS: Median medication burden was higher in leukemia/lymphoma patients (6 orders) compared to solid (4 orders) or CNS tumor patients (4 orders, P = 0.006). Overall, the median number of prescriptions per patient did not change until death (P = 0.42), while there was a significant reduction for some medication subgroups (chemotherapy [P = 0.035], steroids [P = 0.010]).Patients dying in the ICU (n=15) had a higher medication burden at death (6 orders) than patients dying on wards (3 orders, P = 0.001). There was a trend for a reduction in medication burden in patients with "Do not resuscitate" (DNR) orders (P = 0.055). CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy is ubiquitous among pediatric oncology patients at EOL. Disease type and DNR status may affect medication burden and deprescribing during the last hospitalization.
Tamir S; Kurnik D; Weyl BAM; Postovsky S
The Israel Medical Association Journal
2021
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"></a>
Bisphosphonates for the relief of pain secondary to bone metastases
Humans; Analgesics; Pain/drug therapy; Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use; Bone Neoplasms/complications/drug therapy/secondary; Clodronate; Clodronic Acid/therapeutic use; Diphosphonates/therapeutic use; Etidronic Acid/therapeutic use; Randomized Controlled Trials
BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates form part of standard therapy for hypercalcemia and the prevention of skeletal events in some cancers. However, the role of bisphosphonates in pain relief for bony metastases remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of bisphosphonates for the relief of pain from bone metastases. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE (1966-1999), EMBASE (1980-1999), CancerLit (1966-1999), the Cochrane library (Issue 1, 2000) and the Oxford Pain Database were searched using the strategy devised by the Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group with additional terms 'diphosphonate', 'bisphosphonate', 'multiple myeloma' and 'bone neoplasms'. (Last search: January 2000). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials of bisphosphonates compared with open, blinded, or different doses/types of bisphosphonates in cancer patients were included where pain and/or analgesic consumption were outcome measures. Studies where pain was reported only by observers were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Article eligibility, quality assessment and data extraction were undertaken by both reviewers. The proportions of patients with pain relief at 4, 8 and 12 weeks were assessed. The proportion of patients with analgesic reduction, the mean pain score, mean analgesic consumption, adverse drug reactions, and quality of life data were compared as secondary outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty randomized controlled studies (21 blinded, four open and five active control) with a total of 3682 subjects were included. For each outcome, there were few studies with available data. For the proportion of patients with pain relief (eight studies) pooled data showed benefits for the treatment group, with an NNT at 4 weeks of 11[95% CI 6-36] and at 12 weeks of 7 [95% CI 5-12]. In terms of adverse drug reactions, the NNH was 16 [95% CI 12-27] for discontinuation of therapy. Nausea and vomiting were reported in 24 studies with a non-significant trend for greater risk in the treatment group. One study showed a small improvement in quality of life for the treatment group at 4 weeks. The small number of studies in each subgroup with relevant data limited our ability to explore the most effective bisphosphonates and their relative effectiveness for different primary neoplasms. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence to support the effectiveness of bisphosphonates in providing some pain relief for bone metastases. There is insufficient evidence to recommend bisphosphonates for immediate effect; as first line therapy; to define the most effective bisphosphonates or their relative effectiveness for different primary neoplasms. Bisphosphonates should be considered where analgesics and/or radiotherapy are inadequate for the management of painful bone metastases.
2002
Wong R; Wiffen PJ
Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews
2002
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd002068" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1002/14651858.cd002068</a>
The biochemical basis of metabolism in cancer cachexia
Humans; Survival Rate; Disease Progression; Neoplasms/complications; Energy Metabolism; Nutritional Failure; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use; Lipid Metabolism; Carbohydrate Metabolism; Proteins/metabolism; Anorexia/etiology; Appetite Stimulants/therapeutic use; Cachexia/etiology/metabolism/mortality/physiopathology/therapy; Cytokines/antagonists & inhibitors/physiology; Hydrazines/therapeutic use; Nutritional Support/methods; Weight Loss
Cancer cachexia is a syndrome of progressive body wasting characterized by loss of adipose tissue and skeletal muscle mass. It is the most common side effect of malignancy occurring in approximately one-half of untreated cancer patients. The pathophysiology of cancer cachexia is not fully understood; however, studies have shown that cytokines are important in the alteration of carbohydrate, lipid, and protein metabolism. This leads to a shorter survival time and a decreased response to therapy. Cachexia is often found before any signs or symptoms of the cancer. An uncertainty with cachexia is whether nutritional support is feeding the patient or the tumor. Often, cachexia is not responsive to simple nutritional interventions. Furthermore, appetite stimulants, cytokine inhibitors, and Cori cycle inhibitors have been used to treat cancer cachexia.
2004
Tijerina AJ
Dimensions Of Critical Care Nursing
2004
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1097/00003465-200411000-00001" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1097/00003465-200411000-00001</a>
Complementary and alternative therapy use in pediatric oncology patients with failure of frontline chemotherapy
Child; Female; Humans; infant; Male; Survival Rate; Young Adult; Adult; Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome; Religion; Complementary Therapies; Treatment Failure; adolescent; Preschool; infant; Newborn; Neoplasms/therapy; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use; Salvage Therapy
BACKGROUND: The use of CAM by the relapsed pediatric oncology population has largely gone unstudied. The main objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of and change in CAM use in oncology patients for whom frontline therapy had failed. Secondary objectives included describing patient/family objectives for using CAM, satisfaction with CAM, financial and time expenditures on CAM, and patient desire for physician involvement in CAM use. PROCEDURE: Fifty-four patients 0-25 years of age, for whom frontline therapy had failed, were enrolled. The subjects completed an anonymous one-time self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of respondents reported using CAM, 52% of which reported initiating or increasing CAM use after failure of frontline therapy. The most commonly used CAM categories were prayer/spiritual healing (83%) and oral/dietary supplements (31%). Prayer/spiritual healing was most commonly used to cure or slow the progression of cancer (59%). Oral/dietary supplements were used to improve overall health and well-being (65%). Estimates of money and time spent ranged from $0 to >$1,275 (median $225) and 1 to > 700 hr (median 10 hr). Sixty percent of CAM users reported their oncologist was unaware of their use. Most participants who used non-spiritual/prayer CAM continued use while hospitalized or while receiving chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding usage patterns may better help pediatric oncologists and palliative-care specialists address the needs of this population, and protect against potentially dangerous drug interactions or side effects from combined CAM and chemotherapy use.
Paisley MA; Kang T; Insogna IG; Rheingold SR
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
2011
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Journal Article
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.22939" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">10.1002/pbc.22939</a>