The association of age, literacy, and race on completing patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric oncology
cancer; literacy; patient-reported outcomes; pediatric
Age is often used to determine when children can begin completing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments or transition to adult instruments. This study’s purpose was to determine relationships between literacy, age, and race and their influence on a child’s ability to understand and complete a PRO instrument.
Withycombe J S; McFatrich M; Pinheiro L; Hinds P S; Keller F G; Baker J N; Mack J W; Sung L; Waldron M K; Reeve B B
Quality of Life Research
2019
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02109-9" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1007/s11136-019-02109-9</a>
Mapping child and adolescent self-reported symptom data to clinician-reported adverse event grading to improve pediatric oncology care and research
adverse events; patient-reported outcomes; pediatric oncology; toxicity grading
BACKGROUND: Clinicians are the standard source for adverse event (AE) reporting in oncology trials, despite the subjective nature of symptomatic AEs. The authors designed a pediatric patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for symptomatic AEs to support the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (the Pediatric PRO-CTCAE). The current study developed a standardized algorithm that maps all possible Pediatric PRO-CTCAE response patterns to recommended CTCAE grades to improve the accuracy of AE reporting in pediatric oncology trials. METHODS: Two rounds of surveys were administered to experienced cancer clinicians across 9 pediatric hospitals. In round 1, pediatric oncologists assigned CTCAE grades to all 101 possible Pediatric PRO-CTCAE response patterns. The authors evaluated clinician agreement of CTCAE grades across response patterns and categorized each response pattern as having high or low agreement. In round 2, a survey was sent to a larger clinician group to examine clinician agreement among a select set of Pediatric PRO-CTCAE response patterns, and the authors examined how clinical context influenced grade assignment. RESULTS: A total of 10 pediatric oncologists participated in round 1. Of the 101 possible patterns, 89 (88%) had high agreement. The Light weighted kappa was averaged across the 10 oncologists (Light kappa = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.66-0.81). A total of 139 clinicians participated in round 2. High clinician agreement remained for the majority of generic response patterns and the clinical context did not typically change grades but rather improved agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides a framework for integrating child self-reported symptom data directly into mandated AE reporting in oncology trials. Translating Pediatric PRO-CTCAE responses into clinically meaningful metrics will guide future cancer care and toxicity grading.
McFatrich M; Brondon J; Lucas N R; Hinds P S; Maurer S H; Mack J W; Freyer D R; Jacobs S S; Baker J N; Mowbray C; Wang M; Castellino S M; Barz Leahy A; Reeve B B
Cancer
2019
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32525" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1002/cncr.32525</a>
Impact of Race and Ethnicity on End-of-Life Experiences for Children With Cancer
end of life; ethnicity; oncology; palliative care; pediatric; race
BACKGROUND:: Racial and ethnic disparities in the provision of end-of-life care are well described in the adult oncology literature. However, the impact of racial and ethnic disparities at end of life in the context of pediatric oncology remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE:: To investigate associations between end-of-life experiences and race/ethnicity for pediatric patients with cancer. METHODS:: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 321 children with cancer enrolled on a palliative care service at an urban pediatric cancer who died between 2011 and 2015. RESULTS:: Compared to white patients, black patients were more likely to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; odds ratio [OR]: 4.109, confidence interval [CI]: 1.432-11.790, P = .009) and underwent 3.136 (CI: 1.433-6.869, P = .004) CPR events for every 1 white patient CPR event. The remainder of variables related to treatment and end-of-life care were not significantly correlated with race. Hispanic patients were less likely to receive cancer-directed therapy within 28 days prior to death (OR: 0.493, CI: 0.247-0.982, P = .044) as compared to non-Hispanic patients, yet they were more likely to report a goal of cure over comfort as compared to non-Hispanic patients (OR: 3.094, CI: 1.043-9.174, P = .042). The remainder of variables were not found to be significantly correlated with ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS:: Race and ethnicity influenced select end-of-life variables for pediatric palliative oncology patients treated at a large urban pediatric cancer center. Further multicenter investigation is needed to ascertain the impact of racial/ethnic disparities on end-of-life experiences of children with cancer.
Kaye E C; Gushue C A; DeMarsh S; Jerkins J; Li C; Lu Z; Snaman J M; Blazin L; Johnson L M; Levine D R; Morrison R R; Baker J N
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
2019
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/1049909119836939" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1177/1049909119836939</a>
Predictors of Location of Death for Children with Cancer Enrolled on a Palliative Care Service
article.; Death; End of life; Female; Humans; Location of death; Male; Neoplasms/*mortality; palliative care; Palliative Care/*methods; palliative oncology; Pediatric oncology
BACKGROUND: In the U.S., more children die from cancer than from any other disease, and more than one third die in the hospital setting. These data have been replicated even in subpopulations of children with cancer enrolled on a palliative care service. Children with cancer who die in high-acuity inpatient settings often experience suffering at the end of life, with increased psychosocial morbidities seen in their bereaved parents. Strategies to preemptively identify children with cancer who are more likely to die in high-acuity inpatient settings have not been explored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standardized tool was used to gather demographic, disease, treatment, and end-of-life variables for 321 pediatric palliative oncology (PPO) patients treated at an academic pediatric cancer center who died between 2011 and 2015. Multinomial logistic regression was used to predict patient subgroups at increased risk for pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) death. RESULTS: Higher odds of dying in the PICU were found in patients with Hispanic ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 4.02; p = .002), hematologic malignancy (OR, 7.42; p < .0001), history of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (OR, 4.52; p < .0001), total number of PICU hospitalizations (OR, 1.98; p < .0001), receipt of cancer-directed therapy during the last month of life (OR, 2.96; p = .002), and palliative care involvement occurring less than 30 days before death (OR, 4.7; p < .0001). Conversely, lower odds of dying in the PICU were found in patients with hospice involvement (OR, 0.02; p < .0001) and documentation of advance directives at the time of death (OR, 0.37; p = .033). CONCLUSION: Certain variables may predict PICU death for PPO patients, including delayed palliative care involvement. Preemptive identification of patients at risk for PICU death affords opportunities to study the effects of earlier palliative care integration and increased discussions around preferred location of death on end-of-life outcomes for children with cancer and their families. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Children with cancer who die in high-acuity inpatient settings often experience a high burden of intensive therapy at the end of life. Strategies to identify patients at higher risk of dying in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) have not been explored previously. This study finds that certain variables may predict PICU death for pediatric palliative oncology patients, including delayed palliative care involvement. Preemptive identification of patients at risk for PICU death affords opportunities to study the effects of earlier palliative care integration and increased discussions around preferred location of death on end-of-life outcomes for children with cancer and their families.
Kaye E C; DeMarsh S; Gushue C A; Jerkins J; Sykes A; Lu Z; Snaman J M; Blazin L J; Johnson L M; Levine D R; Morrison R R; Baker J N
Oncologist
2018
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0650" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0650</a>
Models of Pediatric Palliative Oncology Outpatient Care-Benefits, Challenges, and Opportunities
models; oncology; outpatient care; Pediatric palliative care
PURPOSE: Although the bulk of current pediatric palliative care (PPC) services are concentrated in inpatient settings, the vast majority of clinical care, symptom assessment and management, decision-making, and advance care planning occurs in the outpatient and home settings. As integrated PPC/pediatric oncology becomes the standard of care, novel pediatric palliative oncology (PPO) outpatient models are emerging. The optimal PPO model is unknown and likely varies on the basis of institutional culture, resources, space, and personnel. METHODS: We review five institutions' unique outpatient PPO clinical models with their respective benefits and challenges. This review offers pragmatic guidance regarding PPO clinic development, implementation, and resource allocation. RESULTS: Specific examples include a floating clinic model, embedded disease-specific PPC experts, embedded consultative or trigger-based supportive care clinics, and telehealth clinics. CONCLUSION: Organizations that have overcome personnel, funding, and logistical challenges can serve as role models for centers developing PPO clinic models. In the absence of a one-size-fits-all model, pediatric oncology and PPC groups can select, tailor, and implement the model that best suits their respective personnel, needs, and capacities. Emerging PPO clinics must balance the challenges and opportunities unique to their organization, with the goal of providing high-quality PPC for children with cancer and their families.
Brock K E; Snaman J M;Kaye E C; Bower K A; Weaver M S; Baker J N; Wolfe J; Ullrich C
Journal of Oncology Practice
2019
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1200/jop.19.00100" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1200/jop.19.00100</a>
Hospice nurses request paediatric-specific educational resources and training programs to improve care for children and families in the community: Qualitative data analysis from a population-level survey
qualitative research; Paediatrics; palliative care; education; hospice and palliative care nursing; health care surveys; hospice care; nursing
BACKGROUND: Children with serious illness who receive hospice care often interface with nurses who lack training, experience and comfort in the provision of paediatric palliative and hospice care. Hospice nurse preferences for paediatric-specific training are not well known. AIM: To describe the types of paediatric-specific training received and educational content preferred by hospice nurses. DESIGN: Population-level dissemination of a cross-sectional survey with qualitative analysis of open-ended survey items. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Nurses from 71 community-based hospice organizations across 3 states completed the survey. RESULTS: An open-ended response was provided by 278/551 (50.5%) survey respondents. A total of 55 respondents provided 58 descriptions of prior paediatric-specific training, including a formal 2-day course (n = 36; 65.5%), on-the-job education (n = 13, 23.6%), online training (n = 5, 9.1%), nursing school (n = 2, 3.6%) and paediatric advanced life support courses (n = 2, 3.6%). A total of 67 respondents described 74 hospice-led educational efforts, largely comprised of a 2-day course (n = 39; 54.2%) or provision of written materials (n = 11; 15.3%). A total of 189 respondents described 258 preferences for paediatric-specific training, with nearly half (n = 93; 49.2%) requesting 'any' or 'all' types of education and the remainder requesting education around medication use (n = 48; 25.4%), symptom assessment/management (n = 32; 16.9%), pain assessment/management (n = 28; 14.8), communication (n = 29; 15.3%) and psychosocial assessment/management (n = 28; 14.8). CONCLUSIONS: Hospice nurses self-report inadequate exposure to educational resources and programs, in conjunction with a strong desire for increased paediatric-specific training. Identification of targetable gaps should inform the development of educational resources, policies and other supportive interventions to improve delivery of care to children and families in the community.
Kaye EC; Applegarth J; Gattas M; Kiefer A; Reynolds J; Zalud K; Baker JN
Palliative Medicine
2019
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319866576" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1177/0269216319866576</a>
Research Priorities in Pediatric Palliative Care
Palliative Care; Parents/px [Psychology]; Humans; United States; Pediatrics; Delphi Technique; Attitude of Health Personnel; Research
OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the perspectives of a broad range of pediatric palliative care (PPC) clinicians and parents, to formulate a consensus on prioritization of the PPC research agenda. STUDY DESIGN: A 4-round modified Delphi online survey was administered to PPC experts and to parents of children who had received PPC. In round 1, research priorities were generated spontaneously. Rounds 2 and 3 then served as convergence rounds to synthesize priorities. In round 4, participants were asked to rank the research priorities that had reached at least 80% consensus. RESULTS: A total of 3093 concepts were spontaneously generated by 170 experts and 72 parents in round 1 (65.8% response rate [RR]). These concepts were thematically organized into 78 priorities and recirculated for round 2 ratings (n = 130; 53.7% RR). Round 3 achieved response stability, with 31 consensus priorities oscillating within 10% of the mode (n = 98; 75.4% RR). Round 4 resulted in consensus recognition of 20 research priorities, which were thematically grouped as decision making, care coordination, symptom management, quality improvement, and education. CONCLUSIONS: This modified Delphi survey used professional and parental consensus to identify preeminent PPC research priorities. Attentiveness to these priorities may help direct resources and efforts toward building a formative evidence base. Investigating PPC implementation approaches and outcomes can help improve the quality of care services for children and families.
Baker JN; Levine D R; Hinds PS; Weaver MS; Cunningham MJ; Johnson L; Anghelescu D; Mandrell B; Gibson DV; Jones B; Wolfe J; Feudtner C; Friebert S; Carter B; Kane J R
Journal of Pediatrics
2015
Article information provided for research and reference use only. PedPalASCNET does not hold any rights over the resource listed here. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.05.002" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.05.002</a>
The Impact of Pediatric Palliative Care Involvement in the Care of Critically Ill Patients without Complex Chronic Conditions
end-of-life care; pediatric palliative care; advanced care planning
BACKGROUND: The impact of pediatric palliative care (PPC) is well established for children with chronic complex diseases. However, PPC likely also benefits previously healthy children with acute life-threatening conditions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and impact of PPC for previously healthy patients who died in a pediatric hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of all pediatric deaths over four years. SETTING/SUBJECTS: Patients were 0 to 25 years old, died during an inpatient stay at an academic pediatric hospital >/=48 hours after admission, and had no complex chronic conditions (CCCs) before admission. MEASUREMENTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients met the eligibility criteria. Most died in intensive care settings (n = 149, 89%), and few (n = 34, 20%) received PPC consultations or services. RESULTS: Patients who received PPC services were more likely to receive a multidisciplinary care conference than did patients without PPC support (70.5% vs. 39.9%; p = 0.001), which also occurred earlier for patients who received PPC services (seven days vs. two days before death; p = 0.04). Most patients had documented end-of-life planning in their medical records; however, this occurred earlier for patients who received PPC consultation (9.5 days before death) than for those who did not (two days before death; p < 0.0001). Patients receiving PPC support (67.7%) were also more likely to have a do-not-resuscitate/intubate order before death than those who did not (39.9%; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients without known CCCs who subsequently die as inpatients benefit from PPC in terms of goals of care discussions and documentation of end-of-life care preferences.
Spraker-Perlman HL; Tam RP; Bardsley T; Wilkes J; Farley L; Moore D; Sheetz J; Baker JN
Journal of Palliative Medicine
2018
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0469" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1089/jpm.2018.0469</a>